Firearm-Related Injury and Death in the United States: A Call to Action From 8 Health Professional Organizations and the American Bar Association

2015 ◽  
Vol 162 (7) ◽  
pp. 513 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven E. Weinberger ◽  
David B. Hoyt ◽  
Hal C. Lawrence ◽  
Saul Levin ◽  
Douglas E. Henley ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 171 (8) ◽  
pp. 573 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert M. McLean ◽  
Patrice Harris ◽  
John Cullen ◽  
Ronald V. Maier ◽  
Kyle E. Yasuda ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 1315-1322 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan R. Ellis ◽  
Thomas R. Konrad ◽  
Kathleen C. Thomas ◽  
Joseph P. Morrissey

2008 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 189-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Schmutte ◽  
Maria O'Connell ◽  
Melissa Weiland ◽  
Samuel Lawless ◽  
Larry Davidson

Preventing suicide has been identified as a national priority by recent commissions in the United States. Despite increased awareness of suicide as a public health problem, suicide in older adults remains a neglected topic in prevention strategies and research. This is especially true regarding elderly White men, who in terms of suicide rates have represented the most at-risk age group for the past half century. In light of the unprecedented aging of the United States as the baby boom generation enters late adulthood, suicide prevention initiatives that focus on aging males are needed to prevent a national crisis in geriatric mental health. This article provides a brief review of the perennially under-recognized reality of suicide in older men and prevention strategies that, if implemented, might help stem this rising tide of suicide in this vulnerable population.


PLoS Medicine ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e1001639 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tim K. Mackey ◽  
Bryan A. Liang ◽  
John P. Pierce ◽  
Laurent Huber ◽  
Chris Bostic

2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 688-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tener Goodwin Veenema ◽  
Roberta Proffitt Lavin ◽  
Anne Griffin ◽  
Alicia R. Gable ◽  
Mary Pat Couig ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 111 (1) ◽  
pp. 136-144
Author(s):  
Sylvester O. Orimaye ◽  
Nathan Hale ◽  
Edward Leinaar ◽  
Michael G. Smith ◽  
Amal Khoury

Objectives. To examine the differences in adolescent birth rates by deprivation and Health Professional Shortage Areas (HPSAs) in rural and urban counties of the United States in 2017 and 2018. Methods. We analyzed available data on birth rates for females aged 15 to 19 years in the United States using the restricted-use natality files from the National Center for Health Statistics, American Community Survey 5-year population estimates, and the Area Health Resources Files. Results. Rural counties had an additional 7.8 births per 1000 females aged 15 to 19 years (b = 7.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 7.13, 8.55) compared with urban counties. Counties with the highest deprivation had an additional 23.1 births per 1000 females aged 15 to 19 years (b = 23.12; 95% CI = 22.30, 23.93), compared with less deprived counties. Rural counties with whole shortage designation had an additional 8.3 births per 1000 females aged 15 to 19 years (b = 8.27; 95% CI = 6.86, 9.67) compared with their urban counterparts. Conclusions. Rural communities across deprivation and HPSA categories showed disproportionately high adolescent birth rates. Future research should examine the extent to which contraceptive access differs among deprived and HPSA-designated rural communities and the impact of policies that may create barriers for rural communities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document