Cost-Effectiveness of Transitional Care Services After Hospitalization With Heart Failure

2020 ◽  
Vol 172 (4) ◽  
pp. 248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel R. Blum ◽  
Henning Øien ◽  
Harris L. Carmichael ◽  
Paul Heidenreich ◽  
Douglas K. Owens ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lakshmi Gopalakrishnan ◽  
Loay Kabbani ◽  
Sarah Brown ◽  
Rachel Goodman ◽  
Ana Montoya ◽  
...  

Background: Prior studies have demonstrated that approximately 5.7 million Americans suffer from heart failure (HF). The direct costs of HF have been estimated at $39.3 billion, and the annual cost of unplanned readmissions is approximately $17.4 billion. Many interventions have been implemented in order to decrease healthcare costs and burden of this disease. Case management (CM) is an intervention that has been utilized in inpatient and outpatient settings. The purpose of this study was to analyze the cost-effectiveness of using CM in addition to usual care in a tertiary hospital that has a large HF population to decrease the 30-day readmission rate. Objectives: We hypothesize that the addition of CM to provide transitional care services to HF patients will decrease 30-day readmission rate, consequently decreasing healthcare utilization costs and improving patient’s quality of life (QoL). Methods: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis using a decision analytic model that incorporated Markov processes to evaluate the use of CM for HF patients. We compared two different management strategies following index HF hospitalization: ‘usual care’ versus ‘usual care plus CM’. Our analysis was conducted from a societal perspective with estimated key cost parameters based on established Diagnosis-related Groups (DRGs) and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP). Lastly, patients’ quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were measured by days spent out of the hospital. Results: In our analysis, ’usual care plus CM’ resulted in cost savings of $696.58 per patient when compared to ‘usual care’ alone for an ACO based health system with large HF patient volume. In addition, ‘usual care plus CM’ was associated with shorter inpatient stay (decrease in 0.35 inpatient days), and a slight increase in QALYs by 0.003. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that ACO-based health system’s investment in CM in addition to usual care decrease the cost per discharge of complex HF patients.


JAMA ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 321 (8) ◽  
pp. 753 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriette G. C. Van Spall ◽  
Shun Fu Lee ◽  
Feng Xie ◽  
Urun Erbas Oz ◽  
Richard Perez ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 1427-1443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harriette G.C. Van Spall ◽  
Tahseen Rahman ◽  
Oliver Mytton ◽  
Chinthanie Ramasundarahettige ◽  
Quazi Ibrahim ◽  
...  

1997 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 256-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leif Erhardt ◽  
Stephen Ball ◽  
Fredrik Andersson ◽  
Peter Bergentoft ◽  
Carlos Martinez

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. e037999
Author(s):  
Martina Rimmele ◽  
Jenny Wirth ◽  
Sabine Britting ◽  
Thomas Gehr ◽  
Margit Hermann ◽  
...  

IntroductionIn Germany, an efficient and feasible transition from hospital to home for older patients, ensuring continuous care across healthcare settings, has not yet been applied and evaluated. Based on the transitional care model (TCM), this study aims to reduce preventable readmissions of patients ≥75 years of age with a transitional care intervention performed by geriatric-experienced care professionals. The study investigates whether the intervention ensures continuous care during transition and stabilises the care situation of patients at home.Methods and analysesRandomised controlled clinical trial, recruiting between 25 April 2018 and 31 December 2019 in one German hospital in the city of Regensburg. The intervention group is supported by care professionals in the transition process from hospital to home for up to 12 months. Based on TCM, the intervention includes an individual care plan according to a patient’s symptoms, risks, needs and values. The plan is advanced in the domestic situation via personal visits and telephone contacts. All necessary care actions regarding, for example, mobility, residence adjustments, or nutrition, are initiated to be executed by ambulant care services, and are monitored, evaluated and adapted if necessary. In supervising the care plan, the care professionals do not administer active care services themselves but coordinate them. Patients and their caregivers are actively engaged in the care planning and execution. In contrast, the control group receives only usual discharge planning in the hospital and usual ambulatory care.The primary outcome is the all-cause readmission rate assessed using health insurance data within a follow-up of up to 12 months after hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes include care quality, mobility, nutritional and wound situation, and health-related quality of life. They are assessed at baseline, after 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and at the end of study visit. Additionally, the economic efficiency of the intervention will be evaluated.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval for the trial was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg. Results will be published in peer-reviewed, open-access scientific journals and disseminated at national and international research conferences and through public presentations in the geriatric and healthcare community.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03513159.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document