An Assessment of Hallux Limitus in University Basketball Players Compared with Noncompetitive Individuals

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (5) ◽  
pp. 468-472 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Trégouët
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Artificial Turf ◽  
Basketball Players ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Limitus ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Turf Toe ◽  
The Difference

BackgroundInjuries of the first metatarsophalangeal joint have lately been receiving attention from researchers owing to the important functions of this joint. However, most of the studies of turf toe injuries have focused on sports played on artificial turf.MethodsThis study compared the range of motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint in collegiate basketball players (n = 123) and noncompetitive individuals (n = 123).ResultsA statistically significant difference (P < .001) in range of motion was found between the two groups. The difference between the two sample means was 21.35°.ConclusionsWith hallux rigidus being a potential sequela of repeated turf toe injuries, it seems likely that subacute turf toe injuries occur in basketball players, leading to degenerative changes that result in hallux limitus.

scholarly journals Treatment of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus and Impact of Arthrodesis versus Arthroplasty on Patient Reported Outcomes

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 2473011417S0001
Author(s):  
Monique Chambers ◽  
MaCalus Hogan ◽  
Dukens LaBaze
Keyword(s):  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Outcome Scores ◽  
Vas Scores ◽  
End Stage

Category: Bunion, Midfoot/Forefoot Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is a degenerative disease of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Severe, end-stage hallux rigidus can become debilitating with surgical intervention becoming necessary once conservative measures and shoe modifications have failed. Joint salvage procedures include metatarsal phalangeal (MTP) arthrodesis and MTP arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to assess for differences in patient reported outcomes in two cohorts who underwent fusion or joint reconstruction. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data of 385 patients from an academic medical institution. Patients who underwent surgical intervention from July 2015 to November 2016 were identified based on CPT codes for MTP arthrodesis (28750) and arthroplasty (28293). We extracted outcome scores including SF12-M, SF12-P, FAAM, and VAS scores. Exclusion criteria included poly-trauma, revision procedures, and lack of pre and post-operative outcome scores. Mann- Whitney t-test was performed using GraphPad Prism version 7.0b for Mac to compare procedure groups, with significance define by a p-value of 0.05. Results: A total of eighteen patients met the inclusion criteria, with 6 who underwent arthroplasty and 12 arthrodesis. The average age was 63.7 amongst the cohort, with a total of 16 female and 2 males. Patients who underwent arthrodesis had better outcomes across all parameters. When comparing preoperative and postoperative scores, arthrodesis patients showed greater improvement of SF12-M (arthrodesis 9 vs arthroplasty -2, p=0.05), and SF12-P (9 vs -16, respectively p=0.05) scores. Arthroplasty patients were more likely to have a decrease in their SF-12 scores. VAS scores and FAAM scores showed no statistical difference between the two cohorts. Postoperative VAS scores were worse in 33% of arthroplasty patients despite surgical intervention, compared to 10% of arthrodesis patients. Conclusion: Our results suggests that both procedures provide a statistically significant difference in pain with several patients having a Global Rate of Change that is “very much better”. However, fusion of the metatarsophalangeal joint results in improved pain and functional outcomes for patients with severe hallux rigidus. These findings are consistent with current reports in the literature, which are mostly case series reports. Larger studies are needed to provide appropriate power and better support the findings of this study.

scholarly journals Consumer Prices for Surgical Management of End-Stage Hallux Rigidus

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 2473011419S0007
Author(s):  
Niall A. Smyth ◽  
Vaishnavi Krishnan ◽  
Johnathon R. McCormick ◽  
Jonathan R. Kaplan ◽  
Amiethab A. Aiyer
Keyword(s):  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Potential Cost ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Consumer Prices ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean ◽  
End Stage

Category: Midfoot/Forefoot, Healthcare economics Introduction/Purpose: Hallux rigidus is the most prevalent arthritic condition of the foot. Treatment of end-stage disease traditionally consists of a first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthrodesis, however the use of a synthetic cartilage implant is becoming more common. With the high prevalence of disease and implementation of new treatment modalities, healthcare consumers should be aware of the costs associated with management. The purpose of this study was to determine access to the cost and variability in price of first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Methods: Forty academic centers were contacted using a standardized patient script. The patient was a 59-year-old female who had failed conservative treatment of hallux rigidus. Each institution was contacted up to three times in an attempt to obtain a full bundled operative quote for a first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Results: Twenty centers (50%) provided a quote for first MTPJ arthrodesis and 15 centers (38%) provided a quote for synthetic cartilage implantation. Only 14 centers (35%) were able to provide a quote for both procedures. The mean bundled price for MTPJ arthrodesis was $21,767 (range, $8,417 – $39,265). The mean bundled price for synthetic cartilage implantation was $21,546 (range, $4,903 – $74,145). There was no statistically significant difference between the bundled price for first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic cartilage implantation. Conclusion: There was limited availability of consumer prices for first MTPJ arthrodesis and synthetic implantation, therefore impeding healthcare consumers’ decision making. There was a wide range of quotes for both procedures, indicating potential cost savings.

Distally Based Capsule-Periosteum Interpositional Arthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus

2003 ◽  
Vol 93 (5) ◽  
pp. 349-366 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas S. Roukis ◽  
Adam S. Landsman ◽  
James B. Ringstrom ◽  
Peter Kirschner ◽  
Markus Wuenschel
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Subjective Evaluation ◽  
Joint Space Width ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Joint Space ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty ◽  
Distally Based ◽  
Space Width

Twelve patients (15 feet) with severe hallux rigidus underwent distally based capsule-periosteum interpositional arthroplasty of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (mean ± SD follow-up, 16.8 ± 7.0 months). Subjective evaluation was based on a modified version of the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society’s 100-point Hallux Metatarsophalangeal-Interphalangeal Joint Scale. Objective evaluation consisted of preoperative and postoperative physical examinations (first metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion and axial grind testing) and radiographic evaluations (joint space width). The short-term results of this novel procedure showed subjective patient improvement and satisfaction, increased first metatarsophalangeal joint dorsal range of motion, maintained hallux plantar range of motion and power, and improved joint space width on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs. None of the patients developed a hallux hammer toe or extensus deformity or lesser metatarsalgia, and none required further surgical intervention. After describing the indications of the procedure and the surgical technique, the authors compare the results with those of the various other procedures available for the surgical treatment of hallux rigidus. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 93(5): 349-366, 2003)

Biomechanical Risk Factors in the Development of Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome in Distance Runners

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 436-444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jo L. Tweed ◽  
Jackie A. Campbell ◽  
Steven J. Avil
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Medial Tibial Stress Syndrome ◽  
Distance Runners ◽  
Talocrural Joint ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Stress Syndrome ◽  
Foot Posture ◽  
The Difference ◽  
The Relationship

Background: We investigated the relationship between functional and static foot posture and medial tibial stress syndrome in distance runners. Methods: Twenty-eight runners with a clinical diagnosis of medial tibial stress syndrome and 12 asymptomatic runners were assessed with the Foot Posture Index to measure static overpronation. Range of motion was measured at the talocrural joint, with the knee extended and flexed as was range of motion at the first metatarsophalangeal joint and the angular difference between the neutral and relaxed calcaneal stance positions. Each participant was then videotaped while running on a treadmill shod and unshod. This videotape was analyzed using freeze frame to identify abnormal or mistimed pronation at each phase of gait. The results were analyzed using logistic regression to give the probability that a runner is likely to experience medial tibial stress syndrome, predicted from the static measurements and dynamic observations. Results: Variables identified as being significant predictors of medial tibial stress syndrome were the difference between the neutral and relaxed calcaneal stance positions, range of motion of the talocrural joint with the knee extended, early heel lift and abductory twist during gait, and apropulsive gait. Conclusion: Runners with suspected symptoms of medial tibial stress syndrome should be assessed dynamically and statically for abnormal or mistimed pronation. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 98(6): 436–444, 2008)

scholarly journals Percutaneous cheilectomy combined with Watermann and Moberg osteotomies for the treatment of hallux rigidus

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 135-139
Author(s):  
Júlio Ferreira de Arruda ◽  
André Donato Baptista
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Plantar Flexion ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Functional Improvement ◽  
Percutaneous Technique ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and functional outcomes of patients subjected to surgical treatment of hallux rigidus by the percutaneous cheilectomy combined with Watermann and Moberg osteotomies. Methods: Between May 2017 and August 2018, the clinical outcomes of 7 patients with a diagnosis of hallux rigidus (HR) treated using the percutaneous technique were assessed using the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and hallux metatarsophalangeal joint range of motion measurements during the pre- and postoperative periods. Clinical and functional outcomes were followed up for a minimum of 6 months (mean of 8 months). Results: The range of motion of the metatarsophalangeal joint during the pre- and postoperative periods showed the following results: dorsiflexion increased on average from 28.00º (± 15.63) to 44.43º (± 17.33) (p = 0.006), demonstrating an effective gain in dorsal articular movement. Plantar flexion ranged on average from 27.43º (± 2.22) to 24.43º (± 5.28) (p = 0.228), with no significant difference between the evaluated periods. The AOFAS score increased on average from 52.71 (± 9.63) to 88.00 (± 8.10) (p < 0.01), representing important functional improvement. The VAS score decreased on average from 7.00 (± 1.52) to 2.14 (± 2.19) (p = 0.002), indicating a significant improvement in patient pain. No patient presented postoperative complications. Conclusion: The results of the present study demonstrated that cheilectomy combined with percutaneous Watermann and Moberg osteotomies is an effective surgical treatment for hallux rigidus, with satisfactory clinical and functional outcomes. Level of Evidence IV; Therapeutic Studies; Case Series.

scholarly journals Concept, etiology, and pathomechanics of hallux rigidus

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-197
Author(s):  
Manuel Monteagudo de la Rosa ◽  
Ramón Viladot-Pericé
Keyword(s):  
Positive Impact ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Compensatory Mechanisms ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Hallux Limitus ◽  
Sliding Mechanism ◽  
Movement Mechanism

There is a continuous anatomical, functional and pathomechanical roadmap from functional hallux limitus to hallux rigidus. Although many etiologies for hallux rigidus have been studied it is very probable that it has a primary origin with less-than-ideal movement when we are born. Upon a restricted range of motion, symptoms may arise depending on the amount of work and how compensatory mechanisms work around the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Changes occurring at the joint that allow the transition from a sliding movement mechanism (physiological) to a rolling mechanism (pathological) may trigger anatomical and functional changes resulting in pain and dysfunction. Any surgical technique that is able to restore the sliding mechanism to the first metatarsophalangeal joint will have a positive impact on pain and function in a patient with a symptomatic functional hallux limitus/rigidus. Level of Evidence V; Therapeutic Study; Expert opinion.

Dynamic Splinting for Postoperative Hallux Limitus

2011 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 285-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mathew M. John ◽  
Stanley Kalish ◽  
Stephen V. Perns ◽  
F. Buck Willis
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Exercise Program ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Home Exercise ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Patients Âgés ◽  
Hallux Limitus ◽  
Dynamic Splinting ◽  
Significant Difference

Background: Hallux limitus (HL) is a pathology of degenerative arthritis in the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTJ) of the great toe. Chief complaints of HL include inflammation, edema, pain, and reduced flexibility. The onset of HL commonly occurs after one of the two most common surgical procedures for foot pathologies, a bunionectomy or a cheilectomy. The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of dynamic splinting in treating patients with postoperative hallux limitus, in a randomized, controlled trial. Methods: Fifty patients (ages 29 to 69) were enrolled after diagnosis of HL following surgery. The duration of this study was eight weeks, and all patients received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, orthotics, and instructions for a home exercise program. Experimental patients were also treated with dynamic splinting for first MTJ extension (60 minutes, three times per day). The dependent variable was change in active range of motion (AROM). A repeated measures analysis of variance was used with independent variables of patient categories, surgical procedure (cheilectomy vs. bunionectomy) and duration since surgery. Results: There was a significant difference in change of AROM for experimental vs. control patients (P &lt; 0.001, T = 4.224, N = 48); there was also a significant difference for patient treated within 2 months of surgery (P = 0.0221). Conclusions: Dynamic splinting was effective in reducing contracture of postoperative hallux limitus in this study; experimental patients gained a mean 250% improvement in AROM. This modality should be considered for standard of care in treating postoperative hallux limitus. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 101(4): 285–288, 2011)

Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Joint Arthroplasty for Hallux Rigidus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert D. Stibolt ◽  
Harshadkumar A. Patel ◽  
Eva J. Lehtonen ◽  
Henry A. DeBell ◽  
Andrew S. Moon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Total Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Joint Arthroplasty ◽  
Forest Plot ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Mean

Background: When surgery is indicated for hallux rigidus, toe arthroplasty is an alternative procedure to arthrodesis for patients who wish to preserve toe range of motion. Our study investigated midterm outcomes of first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) arthroplasty in an effort to discern whether or not partial or total joint replacement confers benefit in these patients. Methods: A systematic review of MTPJ arthroplasty was performed for the years 2000 to 2017. A Forest plot was created comparing preoperative and postoperative American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and range of motion (ROM) results for both hemitoe and total-toe arthroplasty. Statistical analysis was performed. Results: Mean postoperative AOFAS scores in patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty improved by 50.7 points (95% CI = 48.5, 52.8), whereas the mean AOFAS score improvement in total joint arthroplasty patients was 40.6 points (95% CI = 38.5, 42.8). VAS outcomes were comparable. Mean postoperative MTPJ ROM improved by 43.0° (95% CI = 39.3°, 46.6°) in hemitoe patients, which exceeded the mean ROM improvement of 32.5° (95% CI = 29.9°, 35.1°) found in total joint arthroplasty cases. A meta-analysis revealed no significant difference. Conclusion: Hemisurface implants in MTPJ arthroplasty may improve postoperative AOFAS and ROM results to a greater extent than total-toe devices. Level of Evidence: Level IV: Systematic review

Management of Hallux Limitus with Distraction of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2005 ◽  
Vol 95 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-129 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard M. Talarico ◽  
George R. Vito ◽  
Larry Goldstein ◽  
Adam D. Perler
Keyword(s):  
External Fixator ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Long Term Results ◽  
Joint Function ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Limitus

This article describes a joint-preserving and joint-restoring procedure for the management of hallux limitus and hallux rigidus. The procedure uses a minirail external fixator to obtain distraction with or without arthrotomy of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. This procedure aims to restore joint function through elimination of the pathologic forces involved in hallux limitus and hallux rigidus. Both intrinsic and extrinsic muscular imbalances are reduced. Follow-up of 133 patients treated in this manner since 1997 demonstrates excellent long-term results. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 95(2): 121–129, 2005)

Outcomes After Interpositional Arthroplasty of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (5) ◽  
pp. 514-518 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Aynardi ◽  
Lara Atwater ◽  
Eric J. Dein ◽  
Talal Zahoor ◽  
Lew C. Schon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Series ◽  
Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Hallux Rigidus ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
First Metatarsophalangeal Joint ◽  
Interpositional Arthroplasty ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Functional Scores

Background: For patients with hallux rigidus seeking a motion-sparing procedure, interposition arthroplasty is an alternative to fusion. The purpose of this study was to report patient outcomes after interpositional arthroplasty for hallux rigidus. Methods: All patients undergoing interpositional arthroplasty at our institution from 2001 to 2014 were identified and a retrospective chart review was performed. Follow-up was conducted through a telephone survey to obtain survivorship, satisfaction, and functional scores. Survivorship of the interpositional arthroplasty procedure was defined as no subsequent surgery on the hallux after the index procedure. Patients were excluded for incomplete records. Complications were recorded. From 2001 to 2014, 183 patients were identified. Of these, 14 were excluded for incomplete data, leaving 169 patients. Of these, 133 had an average follow-up of 62.2 months (range, 24.3 months to 151.2 months). Results: The overall failure rate was 3.8% (5/133). Patient-reported outcome was rated as excellent in 65.4% (87/133) or good in 24.1% (32/133) of patients and fair or poor in 10.5% (14/133) of patients. Of 133 patients, 101 (76%) were able to return to fashionable or regular footwear. The infection rate was 1.5% (2/133). Patient-reported cock-up deformity of the first metatarsophalangeal joint (MTPJ) occurred in 4.5% (6/133) of patients. In addition, 17.3% (23/133) of patients reported metatarsalgia of the second or third MTPJ at the time of final follow-up, and there was no significant difference between interposition types ( P = .441). Conclusion: Interpositional arthroplasty for hallux rigidus was found to have excellent or good results in most patients at a mean follow-up of 62.2 months. Level of Evidence: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document