A Historical and Current Analysis for the DPM Acquiring an MD or DO Degree and an Unrestricted Medical License

2012 ◽  
Vol 102 (2) ◽  
pp. 172-176
Author(s):  
Leonard A. Levy
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Medical Profession ◽  
Historical Context ◽  
Current Analysis ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Past ◽  
Medical License

The podiatric medical profession has evolved substantially in the past 80 years. This evolution includes major changes in scope, in the requirements necessary to enter a podiatric medical school, and in the curriculum that must be completed to earn the degree of Doctor of Podiatric Medicine. Entrance requirements to the schools are now identical to the prerequisites for admission to MD and DO institutions, and licensure requires the completion of graduate medical education. Much of the curriculum also is the same as it is in MD and DO schools. In the past decade, discussion focusing on the ability of the DPM to acquire the MD or DO degree has intensified. An analysis is provided using a historical context regarding this potential initiative. (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 102(2): 172–176, 2012)

scholarly journals Patterns of Change in ACGME-Accredited Residency Programs and Positions: Implication for the Adequacy of GME Positions and Supply of Physicians in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen D. Holt ◽  
Rebecca S. Miller ◽  
Ingrid Philibert ◽  
Thomas J. Nasca
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Population Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Past ◽  
Accredited Institutions ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Recent studies suggest that the supply of primary care physicians and generalist physicians in other specialties may be inadequate to meet the needs of the US population. Data on the numbers and types of physicians-in-training, such as those collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), can be used to help understand variables affecting this supply. Objective We assessed trends in the number and type of medical school graduates entering accredited residencies, and the impact those trends could have on the future physician workforce. Methods Since 2004, the ACGME has published annually its data on accredited institutions, programs, and residents to help the graduate medical education community understand major trends in residency education, and to help guide graduate medical education policy. We present key results and trends for the period between academic years 2003–2004 and 2012–2013. Results The data show that increases in trainees in accredited programs are not uniform across specialties, or the types of medical school from which trainees graduated. In the past 10 years, the growth in residents entering training that culminates in initial board certification (“pipeline” specialties) was 13.0%, the number of trainees entering subspecialty education increased 39.9%. In the past 5 years, there has been a 25.8% increase in the number of osteopathic physicians entering allopathic programs. Conclusions These trends portend challenges in absorbing the increasing numbers of allopathic and osteopathic graduates, and US international graduates in accredited programs. The increasing trend in subspecialization appears at odds with the current understanding of the need for generalist physicians.

scholarly journals An Examination of Advocacy Education in Residency Training

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-499
Author(s):  
Candice C. Black ◽  
Amy Motta
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Home Program ◽  
External Resources ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Past ◽  
Core Requirements ◽  
Selection Of

Context.— Pathology-related advocacy is best when performed directly by pathologists. Practicing advocacy is included in the Milestones 2.0 and should be introduced during residency training. Objective.— To understand advocacy education in residency training we surveyed pathologists to ask what training they had in residency, what resources were available, and what experiences were most impressionable. Design.— Two types of inquiry were performed. First, a survey to program graduates asking about leadership and advocacy activities during training and about leadership and advocacy activities since graduation. Secondly, focused email and telephone inquiries were made to 12 pathologists—4 in practice for more than 20 years, 4 within the first 10 years of practice, and to 4 PGY4 (postgraduate year 4) residents—asking what training and experiences were available to them, and how they became motivated to become active in practice. Results.— Our results showed that resources available outside of the home program have changed through the years and more national resident groups are available that were not available in the past. These groups may educate trainees in leadership and advocacy. Internally, opportunities to shadow faculty at interdepartmental leadership meetings, as well as selection of the chief resident, are enduring tools for honing these skills. Conclusions.— Teaching advocacy in training is important and part of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core requirements as well as a level 5 Milestone. Education may require a balance of internal and external resources since different programs may offer different opportunities. Shadowing during real advocacy events was the most impressionable experience.

scholarly journals Educating Tomorrow's Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons in Canada: An Evolving Process

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Mulder
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Royal College ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Past ◽  
Primary Specialty

Societal (1), technological, organizational (2), and educational developments during the past ten years havebrought about increasing pressures for change in the graduate medical education of cardiac and thoracicsurgeons (3). These changes effectively lengthened their training to eight years and created a double standardfor the education of a thoracic surgeon. A task force mandated by the Royal College of Physicians andSurgeons of Canada nucleus committees in both cardiac and thoracic surgery, with the support of theCanadian Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons, addressed these issues and made the followingrecommendations: cardiac surgery and thoracic surgery should each become a primary specialty with its ownnucleus committee. Each specialty would require six years of training, with the possibility of obtainingcertification in both specialties after an additional eighteen months of training. Each specialty could also beentered after the completion of full training in general surgery. In addition, the task force urged thedevelopment of a curriculum to guide educational objectives in each specialty. These changes promise tocreate a flexible, shorter, and more focused program for cardiac and thoracic surgeons in both university andcommunity settings.

scholarly journals Placement of US Medical School Graduates Into Graduate Medical Education, 2005 Through 2015

JAMA ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 314 (22) ◽  
pp. 2409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry M. Sondheimer ◽  
Imam M. Xierali ◽  
Geoffrey H. Young ◽  
Marc A. Nivet
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical

scholarly journals A Longitudinal Study of Commonly Used Admissions Measures and Disenrollment from Medical School and Graduate Medical Education Probation or Termination from Training

2018 ◽  
Vol 183 (11-12) ◽  
pp. e680-e684 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Dong ◽  
William R Gilliland ◽  
David Cruess ◽  
Jeffrey Hutchinson ◽  
Lisa Morres ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document