scholarly journals An Examination of Advocacy Education in Residency Training

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (4) ◽  
pp. 497-499
Author(s):  
Candice C. Black ◽  
Amy Motta
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Home Program ◽  
External Resources ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Past ◽  
Core Requirements ◽  
Selection Of

Context.— Pathology-related advocacy is best when performed directly by pathologists. Practicing advocacy is included in the Milestones 2.0 and should be introduced during residency training. Objective.— To understand advocacy education in residency training we surveyed pathologists to ask what training they had in residency, what resources were available, and what experiences were most impressionable. Design.— Two types of inquiry were performed. First, a survey to program graduates asking about leadership and advocacy activities during training and about leadership and advocacy activities since graduation. Secondly, focused email and telephone inquiries were made to 12 pathologists—4 in practice for more than 20 years, 4 within the first 10 years of practice, and to 4 PGY4 (postgraduate year 4) residents—asking what training and experiences were available to them, and how they became motivated to become active in practice. Results.— Our results showed that resources available outside of the home program have changed through the years and more national resident groups are available that were not available in the past. These groups may educate trainees in leadership and advocacy. Internally, opportunities to shadow faculty at interdepartmental leadership meetings, as well as selection of the chief resident, are enduring tools for honing these skills. Conclusions.— Teaching advocacy in training is important and part of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education core requirements as well as a level 5 Milestone. Education may require a balance of internal and external resources since different programs may offer different opportunities. Shadowing during real advocacy events was the most impressionable experience.

scholarly journals Entrustable Professional Activities for Pathology

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 237428951771428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cindy B. McCloskey ◽  
Ronald E. Domen ◽  
Richard M. Conran ◽  
Robert D. Hoffman ◽  
Miriam D. Post ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Clinical Pathology ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activities ◽  
Professional Activity ◽  
Entrustable Professional Activity ◽  
Accreditation Council ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Professional Activities

Competency-based medical education has evolved over the past decades to include the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Accreditation System of resident evaluation based on the Milestones project. Entrustable professional activities represent another means to determine learner proficiency and evaluate educational outcomes in the workplace and training environment. The objective of this project was to develop entrustable professional activities for pathology graduate medical education encompassing primary anatomic and clinical pathology residency training. The Graduate Medical Education Committee of the College of American Pathologists met over the course of 2 years to identify and define entrustable professional activities for pathology graduate medical education. Nineteen entrustable professional activities were developed, including 7 for anatomic pathology, 4 for clinical pathology, and 8 that apply to both disciplines with 5 of these concerning laboratory management. The content defined for each entrustable professional activity includes the entrustable professional activity title, a description of the knowledge and skills required for competent performance, mapping to relevant Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Milestone subcompetencies, and general assessment methods. Many critical activities that define the practice of pathology fit well within the entrustable professional activity model. The entrustable professional activities outlined by the Graduate Medical Education Committee are meant to provide an initial framework for the development of entrustable professional activity–related assessment and curricular tools for pathology residency training.

scholarly journals Patterns of Change in ACGME-Accredited Residency Programs and Positions: Implication for the Adequacy of GME Positions and Supply of Physicians in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 399-403 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathleen D. Holt ◽  
Rebecca S. Miller ◽  
Ingrid Philibert ◽  
Thomas J. Nasca
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Medical School ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Population Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Past ◽  
Accredited Institutions ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Recent studies suggest that the supply of primary care physicians and generalist physicians in other specialties may be inadequate to meet the needs of the US population. Data on the numbers and types of physicians-in-training, such as those collected by the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), can be used to help understand variables affecting this supply. Objective We assessed trends in the number and type of medical school graduates entering accredited residencies, and the impact those trends could have on the future physician workforce. Methods Since 2004, the ACGME has published annually its data on accredited institutions, programs, and residents to help the graduate medical education community understand major trends in residency education, and to help guide graduate medical education policy. We present key results and trends for the period between academic years 2003–2004 and 2012–2013. Results The data show that increases in trainees in accredited programs are not uniform across specialties, or the types of medical school from which trainees graduated. In the past 10 years, the growth in residents entering training that culminates in initial board certification (“pipeline” specialties) was 13.0%, the number of trainees entering subspecialty education increased 39.9%. In the past 5 years, there has been a 25.8% increase in the number of osteopathic physicians entering allopathic programs. Conclusions These trends portend challenges in absorbing the increasing numbers of allopathic and osteopathic graduates, and US international graduates in accredited programs. The increasing trend in subspecialization appears at odds with the current understanding of the need for generalist physicians.

A challenging and rewarding time: The early days of graduate medical education in dermatology

2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-178
Author(s):  
Margaret Maria Cocks
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
20Th Century ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
Scientific Journals ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Personal Reflections

Specialized residency training was still in its infancy in mid-20th century America. While specialty boards in various fields such as ophthalmology and otolaryngology had been established in the 1920s and 1930s, the details of training programs were still being fine-tuned and formal curricula were lacking. In dermatology, three prominent physicians including Harry L. Arnold Jr., J. Lamar Callaway and Walter B. Shelley trained during these experimental days of medical education. Each of them captured personal reflections of their own training experiences in brief memoirs published in scientific journals. A closer examination of these texts provides unique insights into how dermatology subspecialty training in particular and medical education more broadly evolved during this period.

scholarly journals Educating Tomorrow's Cardiac and Thoracic Surgeons in Canada: An Evolving Process

1996 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David S. Mulder
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Royal College ◽  
General Surgery ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
The Past ◽  
Primary Specialty

Societal (1), technological, organizational (2), and educational developments during the past ten years havebrought about increasing pressures for change in the graduate medical education of cardiac and thoracicsurgeons (3). These changes effectively lengthened their training to eight years and created a double standardfor the education of a thoracic surgeon. A task force mandated by the Royal College of Physicians andSurgeons of Canada nucleus committees in both cardiac and thoracic surgery, with the support of theCanadian Society of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons, addressed these issues and made the followingrecommendations: cardiac surgery and thoracic surgery should each become a primary specialty with its ownnucleus committee. Each specialty would require six years of training, with the possibility of obtainingcertification in both specialties after an additional eighteen months of training. Each specialty could also beentered after the completion of full training in general surgery. In addition, the task force urged thedevelopment of a curriculum to guide educational objectives in each specialty. These changes promise tocreate a flexible, shorter, and more focused program for cardiac and thoracic surgeons in both university andcommunity settings.

scholarly journals Leadership Training Programs in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharat Kumar ◽  
Melissa Swee ◽  
Manish Suneja
Keyword(s):  
Medical Education ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Leadership Training ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Leadership Skills ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Case Series ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Graduate Medical

Abstract Background : With the increasing recognition that leadership skills can be acquired, there is a heightened focus on incorporating leadership training as a part of graduate medical education. However, there is considerable lack of agreement regarding how to facilitate acquisition of these skills to resident, chief resident, and fellow physicians. Methods : Articles were identified through a search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ERIC, PsycNet, Cochrane Systemic Reviews, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from 1948 to 2019. Additional sources were identified through contacting authors and scanning references. We included articles that described and evaluated leadership training programs in the United States and Canada. Methodological quality was assessed via the MERSQI (Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument). Results : 15 studies, which collectively included 639 residents, chief residents, and fellows, met the eligibility criteria. The format, content, and duration of these programs varied considerably. The majority focused on conflict management, interpersonal skills, and stress management. Twelve were prospective case series and three were retrospective. Seven used pre- and post-test surveys, while seven used course evaluations. Only three had follow-up evaluations after six months to one year. MERSQI scores ranged from 6 to 9. Conclusions : Despite interest in incorporating structured leadership training into graduate medical education curricula, there is a lack of evidence evaluating its effectiveness. High-quality well-designed studies are required in order to determine if these programs have a lasting effect on the acquisition of leadership skills.

scholarly journals Quality and Safety Training in Primary Care: Making an Impact

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 510-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Byrne ◽  
Susan Hall ◽  
Sam Baz ◽  
Todd Kessler ◽  
Maher Roman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Chief Resident ◽  
Full Time ◽  
Quality And Safety ◽  
Knowledge Test ◽  
Graduate Medical ◽  
Quality And Patient Safety

Abstract Purpose Preparing residents for future practice, knowledge, and skills in quality improvement and safety (QI/S) is a requisite element of graduate medical education. Despite many challenges, residency programs must consider new curricular innovations to meet the requirements. We report the effectiveness of a primary care QI/S curriculum and the role of the chief resident in quality and patient safety in facilitating it. Method Through the Veterans Administration Graduate Medical Education Enhancement Program, we added a position for a chief resident in quality and patient safety, and 4 full-time equivalent internal medicine residents, to develop the Primary Care Interprofessional Patient-Centered Quality Care Training Curriculum. The curriculum includes a first-or second-year, 1-month block rotation that serves as a foundational experience in QI/S and interprofessional care. The responsibilities of the chief resident in quality and patient safety included organizing and teaching the QI/S curriculum and mentoring resident projects. Evaluation included prerotation and postrotation surveys of self-assessed QI/S knowledge, abilities, skills, beliefs, and commitment (KASBC); an end-of-the-year KASBC; prerotation and postrotation knowledge test; and postrotation and faculty surveys. Results Comparisons of prerotation and postrotation KASBC indicated significant self-assessed improvements in 4 of 5 KASBC domains: knowledge (P < .001), ability (P < .001), skills (P < .001), and belief (P < .03), which were sustained on the end-of-the-year survey. The knowledge test demonstrated increased QI/S knowledge (P  =  .002). Results of the postrotation survey indicate strong satisfaction with the curriculum, with 76% (25 of 33) and 70% (23 of 33) of the residents rating the quality and safety curricula as always or usually educational. Most faculty members acknowledged that the chief resident in quality and patient safety enhanced both faculty and resident QI/S interest and participation in projects. Conclusions Our primary care QI/S curriculum was associated with improved and persistent resident self-perceived knowledge, abilities, and skills and increased knowledge-based scores of QI/S. The chief resident in quality and patient safety played an important role in overseeing the curriculum, teaching, and providing leadership.

scholarly journals Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education Locations Predominantly Located in Federally Designated Underserved Areas

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Songhai C. Barclift ◽  
Elizabeth J. Brown ◽  
Sean C. Finnegan ◽  
Elena R. Cohen ◽  
Kathleen Klink
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Medical Education ◽  
Health Center ◽  
Residency Training ◽  
Graduate Medical Education ◽  
Rural Areas ◽  
Clinical Training ◽  
Community Based ◽  
Underserved Area ◽  
Graduate Medical

ABSTRACT  The Teaching Health Center Graduate Medical Education (THCGME) program is an Affordable Care Act funding initiative designed to expand primary care residency training in community-based ambulatory settings. Statute suggests, but does not require, training in underserved settings. Residents who train in underserved settings are more likely to go on to practice in similar settings, and graduates more often than not practice near where they have trained.Background  The objective of this study was to describe and quantify federally designated clinical continuity training sites of the THCGME program.Objective  Geographic locations of the training sites were collected and characterized as Health Professional Shortage Area, Medically Underserved Area, Population, or rural areas, and were compared with the distribution of Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)–funded training positions.Methods  More than half of the teaching health centers (57%) are located in states that are in the 4 quintiles with the lowest CMS-funded resident-to-population ratio. Of the 109 training sites identified, more than 70% are located in federally designated high-need areas.Results  The THCGME program is a model that funds residency training in community-based ambulatory settings. Statute suggests, but does not explicitly require, that training take place in underserved settings. Because the majority of the 109 clinical training sites of the 60 funded programs in 2014–2015 are located in federally designated underserved locations, the THCGME program deserves further study as a model to improve primary care distribution into high-need communities.Conclusions

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document