scholarly journals Effectiveness of Mini Implants in Three-Dimensional Control during Retraction - A Clinical Study

Author(s):  
Ramchandra Prabhakar
2008 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 167-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seung-Min Lim ◽  
Ryoon-Ki Hong

Abstract Recently, many studies have been reported on distal molar movement using temporary anchorage devices. However, the side effects of distal movement, such as distal tipping, rotation, or extrusion, are still unsolved. This article describes the use of the lever-arm and mini-implant system for controlled distal movement of maxillary molars and two clinical cases in which patients were treated with this system. Mini implants are needed to control the point of force application in the posterior area with no anchorage loss. When the length of the lever arm and the position of the mini implant are adjusted, the desired line of action of the distal force is determined with respect to the center of resistance of maxillary molars. The lever-arm and mini-implant system is useful not only for absolute anchorage, but also for three-dimensional control during distal movement of the upper molars.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 5461
Author(s):  
Elmedin Mešić ◽  
Enis Muratović ◽  
Lejla Redžepagić-Vražalica ◽  
Nedim Pervan ◽  
Adis J. Muminović ◽  
...  

The main objective of this research is to establish a connection between orthodontic mini-implant design, pull-out force and primary stability by comparing two commercial mini-implants or temporary anchorage devices, Tomas®-pin and Perfect Anchor. Mini-implant geometric analysis and quantification of bone characteristics are performed, whereupon experimental in vitro pull-out test is conducted. With the use of the CATIA (Computer Aided Three-dimensional Interactive Application) CAD (Computer Aided Design)/CAM (Computer Aided Manufacturing)/CAE (Computer Aided Engineering) system, 3D (Three-dimensional) geometric models of mini-implants and bone segments are created. Afterwards, those same models are imported into Abaqus software, where finite element models are generated with a special focus on material properties, boundary conditions and interactions. FEM (Finite Element Method) analysis is used to simulate the pull-out test. Then, the results of the structural analysis are compared with the experimental results. The FEM analysis results contain information about maximum stresses on implant–bone system caused due to the pull-out force. It is determined that the core diameter of a screw thread and conicity are the main factors of the mini-implant design that have a direct impact on primary stability. Additionally, stresses generated on the Tomas®-pin model are lower than stresses on Perfect Anchor, even though Tomas®-pin endures greater pull-out forces, the implant system with implemented Tomas®-pin still represents a more stressed system due to the uniform distribution of stresses with bigger values.


2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 214-218
Author(s):  
Hakan Yilmaz ◽  
◽  
Fethiye Cakmak Ozlu ◽  
Carmen Karadeniz ◽  
Ersan Ilsay Karadeniz ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anders Meibom ◽  
Hiyayoshi Yurimoto ◽  
Jean‐Pierre Cuif ◽  
Isabelle Domart‐Coulon ◽  
Fanny Houlbreque ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 446-453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa Landin ◽  
Aniket Jadhav ◽  
Sumit Yadav ◽  
Aditya Tadinada

ABSTRACT Objective:  To compare the outcome of mini implant placement by four different methods: blind placement, a single periapical radiograph (PA), a single panoramic radiograph, and a small-volume cone-beam computed tomography (SV-CBCT). Our hypothesis was that SV-CBCT, with its high resolution, low radiation dose, and three-dimensional depiction of area of interest would yield superior diagnostic information in assessing the potential anchorage site compared to currently used methods that often result in undesired root perforations. Materials and Methods:  Potential mini implant sites of 20 dentate or partially dentate human skulls were imaged using three different imaging modalities: PA, panoramic radiograph, and SV-CBCT. Mini implants were placed in 10 maxillary and 10 mandibular randomized sites blindly and using each of the three imaging modalities. Large-volume CBCT scans done postoperatively were used to detect root perforation. Two oral radiologists analyzed the images for perforation of root structures at each site. Results:  There was significantly (P < .05) less root perforation with SV-CBCT when compared with other imaging modalities. Fifty-five percent of mini implants placed blindly, 60% of mini implants placed using PA, and 50% of mini implants placed using a panoramic radiograph perforated a root structure, whereas only 5% of mini implants placed using SV-CBCT perforated a root structure. Conclusions:  Preoperative evaluation of potential mini implant insertion sites using SV-CBCT aids in predictable placement and results in the least amount of root perforation.


Author(s):  
Fabio Annarumma ◽  
Martina D’Emidio ◽  
Giuseppe Rodi ◽  
Gianni Battista ◽  
Giulia Papi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document