scholarly journals Educational opportunities on a ward round; utilising near-peer teaching

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22
Author(s):  
Sarah Frearson ◽  
Sue Gale
2004 ◽  
Vol 118 (12) ◽  
pp. 963-971 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.-L. Montague ◽  
M.S.W. Lee ◽  
S.S.M. Hussain

This survey investigates the attitudes of medical and nursing staff towards the daily otolaryngology ward rounds in a teaching hospital.Initial, open-ended questionnaires generated themes from which a structured questionnaire was constructed. Respondents indicated on a Likert scale the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with statements concerning their attitudes towards the ward round.Thirty-five members of staff were surveyed. The overall response rate was 74.3 per cent (n = 26). The majority of staff agreed that the ward round was a constructive use of their time and served to promote team spirit. It allowed for adequate communication between medical and nursing staff but there was uncertainty about the provision of adequate patient communication. The nursing staff agreed that the ward round provided a valuable learning experience. There was uncertainty about this among the medical staff. There was agreement in both groups that patients find the ward round to be reassuring. A significant majority of staff expressed concerns over maintenance of patient confidentiality.These findings could be used to inform changes in the departmental ward round structure. Specific attention should be directed to discussing sensitive issues in a more private setting and maximizing educational opportunities for junior medical staff.


2009 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 52-57
Author(s):  
John A. Tetnowski

Abstract Cluttering is discussed openly in the fluency literature, but few educational opportunities for learning more about cluttering exist in higher education. The purpose of this manuscript is to explain how a seminar in cluttering was developed for a group of communication disorders doctoral students. The major theoretical issues, educational questions, and conclusions are discussed.


1983 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
Dade Moeller

Author(s):  
J Jahns ◽  
F Recker ◽  
V Thiessen ◽  
K Rüenauver ◽  
B Bailer
Keyword(s):  

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (33) ◽  
pp. 693-714
Author(s):  
. Muntaha Sabbar Jebur

          Peer teaching is a strategy that allows the students to teach the new content to each other, and they must be accurately guided by instructors.     The researcher proposes that the use of students peer teaching  may promote students' achievement  and ensure the engagement of all the students in the learning process. Therefore, the researcher employs it as a teaching method aiming at investigating its  effect on Iraqi EFL students' achievement in the course of Library and Research Work .      The study hypothesizes that there is no significant difference between the students' achievement who are taught library and research work by students peer teaching  and that of the students taught by the traditional way. The experimental design of the study is Parallel Groups, Random Assignment, posttest. Each group consists of 35 students, chosen randomly from the Third Year Students at the Department of English in the College of Basic Education. Both groups were matched in terms of their age and parents' education. The experiment was fulfilled in the first course for 15 weeks during the academic year 2016-2017.       The same materials were presented to both groups. This included   units from Writing Research Paper by Lester D. . Post-test was constructed and exposed  The t-test for  independent samples was used to analyze the results and it is found out that there is a statistical difference between the two groups in their achievement because the calculated t- value 2.635 is bigger than the tabulated t- value which is 2.000, and also shown the superiority of the experimental group. The results indicate that the experimental group, who was taught Library and Research Work by peer teaching   was better than the control group, who was taught according to the traditional way. So, the null hypothesis is rejected. Finally, some recommendations and suggestions are presented in the light of the study findings. to a jury of experts to verify its validity and it was administered to both groups.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document