Experimental and Kinetic Study of Catalytic Cracking of Heavy Fuel Oil over E-Cat/MCM-41 Catalyst

2016 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 615-620
Author(s):  
A. A. Ebrahimi ◽  
S. Tarighi ◽  
A. B. Ani
2014 ◽  
Vol 112 (2) ◽  
pp. 477-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farouq Twaiq ◽  
M. S. Nasser ◽  
Sagheer A. Onaizi

Author(s):  
J.K. Lampert ◽  
G.S. Koermer ◽  
J.M. Macaoy ◽  
J.M. Chabala ◽  
R. Levi-Setti

We have used high spatial resolution imaging secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) to differentiate mineralogical phases and to investigate chemical segregations in fluidized catalytic cracking (FCC) catalyst particles. The oil industry relies on heterogeneous catalysis using these catalysts to convert heavy hydrocarbon fractions into high quality gasoline and fuel oil components. Catalyst performance is strongly influenced by catalyst microstructure and composition, with different chemical reactions occurring at specific types of sites within the particle. The zeolitic portions of the particle, where the majority of the oil conversion occurs, can be clearly distinguished from the surrounding silica-alumina matrix in analytical SIMS images.The University of Chicago scanning ion microprobe (SIM) employed in this study has been described previously. For these analyses, the instrument was operated with a 40 keV, 10 pA Ga+ primary ion probe focused to a 30 nm FWHM spot. Elemental SIMS maps were obtained from 10×10 μm2 areas in times not exceeding 524s.


Clean Air ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farouq Twaiq ◽  
Abdul Rahman Mohamed ◽  
Subhash Bhatia

Author(s):  
Laís A. Nascimento ◽  
Marilda N. Carvalho ◽  
Mohand Benachour ◽  
Valdemir A. Santos ◽  
Leonie A. Sarubbo ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 ◽  
pp. 203-215 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dionisis Stefanitsis ◽  
Ilias Malgarinos ◽  
George Strotos ◽  
Nikolaos Nikolopoulos ◽  
Emmanouil Kakaras ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 2241-2250 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.A. Byrnes ◽  
E.A. Foumeny ◽  
T. Mahmud ◽  
A.S.A.K. Sharifah ◽  
T. Abbas ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
F. Mikaela Nordborg ◽  
Diane L. Brinkman ◽  
Gerard F. Ricardo ◽  
Susana Agustí ◽  
Andrew P. Negri

Author(s):  
Akili D. Khawaji ◽  
Jong-Mihn Wie

The most popular method of controlling sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions in a steam turbine power plant is a flue gas desulfurization (FGD) process that uses lime/limestone scrubbing. Another relatively newer FGD technology is to use seawater as a scrubbing medium to absorb SO2 by utilizing the alkalinity present in seawater. This seawater scrubbing FGD process is viable and attractive when a sufficient quantity of seawater is available as a spent cooling water within reasonable proximity to the FGD scrubber. In this process the SO2 gas in the flue gas is absorbed by seawater in an absorber and subsequently oxidized to sulfate by additional seawater. The benefits of the seawater FGD process over the lime/limestone process and other processes are; 1) The process does not require reagents for scrubbing as only seawater and air are needed, thereby reducing the plant operating cost significantly, and 2) No solid waste and sludge are generated, eliminating waste disposal, resulting in substantial cost savings and increasing plant operating reliability. This paper reviews the thermodynamic aspects of the SO2 and seawater system, basic process principles and chemistry, major unit operations consisting of absorption, oxidation and neutralization, plant operation and performance, cost estimates for a typical seawater FGD plant, and pertinent environmental issues and impacts. In addition, the paper presents the major design features of a seawater FGD scrubber for the 130 MW oil fired steam turbine power plant that is under construction in Madinat Yanbu Al-Sinaiyah, Saudi Arabia. The scrubber with the power plant designed for burning heavy fuel oil containing 4% sulfur by weight, is designed to reduce the SO2 level in flue gas to 425 ng/J from 1,957 ng/J.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document