scholarly journals Technology Trend on the Increase of Biogas Production and Sludge Reduction in Wastewater Treatment Plants: Sludge Pre-treatment Techniques

2014 ◽  
Vol 52 (4) ◽  
pp. 413-424 ◽  
Author(s):  
Il Hyoung Cho ◽  
In Beom Ko ◽  
Ji Tae Kim
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Sludge Reduction ◽  
Treatment Techniques ◽  
Pre Treatment ◽  
Technology Trend

scholarly journals Sludge Reduction Technologies in Wastewater Treatment Plants

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paola Foladori ◽  
Gianni Andreottola ◽  
Giuliano Ziglio
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Sludge Reduction

scholarly journals MBR-Assisted VFAs Production from Excess Sewage Sludge and Food Waste Slurry for Sustainable Wastewater Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (8) ◽  
pp. 2921 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohsen Parchami ◽  
Steven Wainaina ◽  
Amir Mahboubi ◽  
David I’Ons ◽  
Mohammad J. Taherzadeh
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Sewage Sludge ◽  
Food Waste ◽  
Volatile Fatty Acids ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Economic Assessment ◽  
Ph Control ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Solids Concentration

The significant amount of excess sewage sludge (ESS) generated on a daily basis by wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) is mainly subjected to biogas production, as for other organic waste streams such as food waste slurry (FWS). However, these organic wastes can be further valorized by production of volatile fatty acids (VFAs) that have various applications such as the application as an external carbon source for the denitrification stage at a WWTP. In this study, an immersed membrane bioreactor set-up was proposed for the stable production and in situ recovery of clarified VFAs from ESS and FWS. The VFAs yields from ESS and FWS reached 0.38 and 0.34 gVFA/gVSadded, respectively, during a three-month operation period without pH control. The average flux during the stable VFAs production phase with the ESS was 5.53 L/m2/h while 16.18 L/m2/h was attained with FWS. Moreover, minimal flux deterioration was observed even during operation at maximum suspended solids concentration of 32 g/L, implying that the membrane bioreactors could potentially guarantee the required volumetric productivities. In addition, the techno-economic assessment of retrofitting the membrane-assisted VFAs production process in an actual WWTP estimated savings of up to 140 €/h for replacing 300 kg/h of methanol with VFAs.

Carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants

2013 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 887-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. I. Gustavsson ◽  
S. Tumlin
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Carbon Footprint ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Heat Pumps ◽  
Coefficient Of Performance ◽  
Municipal Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Carbon Footprints ◽  
Fossil Carbon

This study estimates the carbon footprints of 16 municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), all situated in Scandinavian countries, by using a simple model. The carbon footprint calculations were based on operational data, literature emission factors (efs) and measurements of greenhouse gas emissions at some of the studied WWTPs. No carbon neutral WWTPs were found. The carbon footprints ranged between 7 and 108 kg CO2e P.E.−1 year−1. Generally, the major positive contributors to the carbon footprint were direct emissions of nitrous oxide from wastewater treatment. Whether heat pumps for effluents have high coefficient of performance or not is extremely important for the carbon footprint. The choice of efs largely influenced the carbon footprint. Increased biogas production, efficient biogas usage, and decreased addition of external fossil carbon source for denitrification are important activities to decrease the carbon footprint of a WWTP.

Pre treatment of Duckweed Biomass, Obtained from Wastewater Treatment Ponds, for Biogas Production

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 2363-2369 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustavo Tonon ◽  
Bruna Scandolara Magnus ◽  
Rodrigo A. Mohedano ◽  
Wanderli R. M. Leite ◽  
Rejane H. R. da Costa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Pre Treatment

scholarly journals Advanced Wastewater Treatment to Eliminate Organic Micropollutants in Wastewater Treatment Plants in Combination with Energy-Efficient Electrolysis at WWTP Mainz

Energies ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (14) ◽  
pp. 3599 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oliver Gretzschel ◽  
Michael Schäfer ◽  
Heidrun Steinmetz ◽  
Erich Pick ◽  
Kim Kanitz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Water Management ◽  
Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Municipal Wastewater ◽  
Wastewater Treatment Plants ◽  
Biogas Production ◽  
Automatic Frequency ◽  
Municipal Wastewater Treatment ◽  
Organic Micropollutants ◽  
Micropollutant Removal

To achieve the Paris climate protection goals there is an urgent need for action in the energy sector. Innovative concepts in the fields of short-term flexibility, long-term energy storage and energy conversion are required to defossilize all sectors by 2040. Water management is already involved in this field with biogas production and power generation and partly with using flexibility options. However, further steps are possible. Additionally, from a water management perspective, the elimination of organic micropollutants (OMP) is increasingly important. In this feasibility study a concept is presented, reacting to energy surplus and deficits from the energy grid and thus providing the needed long-term storage in combination with the elimination of OMP in municipal wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs). The concept is based on the operation of an electrolyzer, driven by local power production on the plant (photovoltaic (PV), combined heat and power plant (CHP)-units) as well as renewable energy from the grid (to offer system service: automatic frequency restoration reserve (aFRR)), to produce hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen is fed into the local gas grid and oxygen used for micropollutant removal via upgrading it to ozone. The feasibility of such a concept was examined for the WWTP in Mainz (Germany). It has been shown that despite partially unfavorable boundary conditions concerning renewable surplus energy in the grid, implementing electrolysis operated with regenerative energy in combination with micropollutant removal using ozonation and activated carbon filter is a reasonable and sustainable option for both, the climate and water protection.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document