scholarly journals Groundwater Recharge Evaluation on Yangok-ri Area of Hongseong Using a Distributed Hydrologic Model (VELAS)

2021 ◽  
Vol 54 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-176
Author(s):  
Kyoochul Ha ◽  
Changhui Park ◽  
Sunghyun Kim ◽  
Esther Shin ◽  
Eunhee Lee
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Recharge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model

scholarly journals Unraveling the time-dependent relevance of input model uncertainties for a lumped hydrologic model of a pre-alpine karst system

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Bittner ◽  
Beatrice Richieri ◽  
Gabriele Chiogna
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Recharge ◽  
Temporal Variations ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Lumped Parameter ◽  
Hydrodynamic Processes ◽  
Input Model ◽  
Karst Model ◽  
Input Uncertainties

AbstractUncertainties in hydrologic model outputs can arise for many reasons such as structural, parametric and input uncertainty. Identification of the sources of uncertainties and the quantification of their impacts on model results are important to appropriately reproduce hydrodynamic processes in karst aquifers and to support decision-making. The present study investigates the time-dependent relevance of model input uncertainties, defined as the conceptual uncertainties affecting the representation and parameterization of processes relevant for groundwater recharge, i.e. interception, evapotranspiration and snow dynamic, on the lumped karst model LuKARS. A total of nine different models are applied, three to compute interception (DVWK, Gash and Liu), three to compute evapotranspiration (Thornthwaite, Hamon and Oudin) and three to compute snow processes (Martinec, Girons Lopez and Magnusson). All the input model combinations are tested for the case study of the Kerschbaum spring in Austria. The model parameters are kept constant for all combinations. While parametric uncertainties computed for the same model in previous studies do not show pronounced temporal variations, the results of the present work show that input uncertainties are seasonally varying. Moreover, the input uncertainties of evapotranspiration and snowmelt are higher than the interception uncertainties. The results show that the importance of a specific process for groundwater recharge can be estimated from the respective input uncertainties. These findings have practical implications as they can guide researchers to obtain relevant field data to improve the representation of different processes in lumped parameter models and to support model calibration.

scholarly journals Evaluation of a Distributed Streamflow Forecast Model at Multiple Watershed Scales

Water ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 1279
Author(s):  
Tyler Madsen ◽  
Kristie Franz ◽  
Terri Hogue
Keyword(s):  
Local Population ◽  
Model Performance ◽  
Forecast Model ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Laboratory Research ◽  
Discharge Data ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model ◽  
Verification Period ◽  
Silver Spring

Demand for reliable estimates of streamflow has increased as society becomes more susceptible to climatic extremes such as droughts and flooding, especially at small scales where local population centers and infrastructure can be affected by rapidly occurring events. In the current study, the Hydrology Laboratory-Research Distributed Hydrologic Model (HL-RDHM) (NOAA/NWS, Silver Spring, MD, USA) was used to explore the accuracy of a distributed hydrologic model to simulate discharge at watershed scales ranging from 20 to 2500 km2. The model was calibrated and validated using observed discharge data at the basin outlets, and discharge at uncalibrated subbasin locations was evaluated. Two precipitation products with nominal spatial resolutions of 12.5 km and 4 km were tested to characterize the role of input resolution on the discharge simulations. In general, model performance decreased as basin size decreased. When sub-basin area was less than 250 km2 or 20–40% of the total watershed area, model performance dropped below the defined acceptable levels. Simulations forced with the lower resolution precipitation product had better model evaluation statistics; for example, the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.67 for the verification period for basin outlets, compared to scores that ranged from 0.33 to 0.52 for the higher spatial resolution forcing.

Continuous streamflow simulation with the HRCDHM distributed hydrologic model

2004 ◽  
Vol 298 (1-4) ◽  
pp. 61-79 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theresa M. Carpenter ◽  
Konstantine P. Georgakakos
Keyword(s):  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model ◽  
Streamflow Simulation

scholarly journals Improved representation of groundwater at a regional scale – coupling of mesocale Hydrologic Model (mHM) with OpeneGeoSys (OGS)

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miao Jing ◽  
Falk Heße ◽  
Wenqing Wang ◽  
Thomas Fischer ◽  
Marc Walther ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Time Series ◽  
Groundwater Flow ◽  
Groundwater Recharge ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Groundwater Modeling ◽  
Coupled Model ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Source Modeling ◽  
Prediction Ability ◽  
Groundwater Head

Abstract. Most of the current large scale hydrological models do not contain a physically-based groundwater flow component. The main difficulties in large-scale groundwater modeling include the efficient representation of unsaturated zone flow, the characterization of dynamic groundwater-surface water interaction and the numerical stability while preserving complex physical processes and high resolution. To address these problems, we propose a highly-scalable coupled hydrologic and groundwater model (mHM#OGS) based on the integration of two open-source modeling codes: the mesoscale hydrologic Model (mHM) and the finite element simulator OpenGeoSys (OGS). mHM#OGS is coupled using a boundary condition-based coupling scheme that dynamically links the surface and subsurface parts. Nested time stepping allows smaller time steps for typically faster surface runoff routing in mHM and larger time steps for slower subsurface flow in OGS. mHM#OGS features the coupling interface which can transfer the groundwater recharge and river baseflow rate between mHM and OpenGeoSys. Verification of the coupled model was conducted using the time-series of observed streamflow and groundwater levels. Moreover, we force the transient model using groundwater recharge in two scenarios: (1) spatially variable recharge based on the mHM simulations, and (2) spatially homogeneous groundwater recharge. The modeling result in first scenario has a slightly higher correlation with groundwater head time-series, which further validates the plausibility of spatial groundwater recharge distribution calculated by mHM in the mesocale. The statistical analysis of model predictions shows a promising prediction ability of the model. The offline coupling method implemented here can reproduce reasonable groundwater head time series while keep a desired level of detail in the subsurface model structure with little surplus in computational cost. Our exemplary calculations show that the coupled model mHM#OGS can be a valuable tool to assess the effects of variability in land surface heterogeneity, meteorological, topographical forces and geological zonation on the groundwater flow dynamics.

A multi-compartment hydrologic model to estimate groundwater recharge in an alluvial-karst system

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ata Joodavi ◽  
Mohammad Zare ◽  
Ezzat Raeisi ◽  
Mohammad Bagher Ahmadi
Keyword(s):  
Groundwater Recharge ◽  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Karst System

Parallelisation of a distributed hydrologic model

2005 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhengtao Cui ◽  
Baxter E. Vieux ◽  
Henry Neeman ◽  
Fekadu Moreda
Keyword(s):  
Hydrologic Model ◽  
Distributed Hydrologic Model
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document