scholarly journals Non-pharmacological Prophylaxis of Venous Thromboembolism in Acutely Ill Medical Patients

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-14
Author(s):  
Luca Masotti
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Pharmacological Prophylaxis

scholarly journals Risk assessment and prevention of venous thromboembolism among hospitalized patients: Results of the regional multicenter study

2021 ◽  
pp. 26-40
Author(s):  
A. B. Sugraliyev ◽  
Sh. S. Aktayeva ◽  
Sh. B. Zhangelova ◽  
S. A. Shiller ◽  
Zh. M. Kussymzhanova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Bed Rest ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Public Health Issue ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Pharmacological Prophylaxis ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis

Introduction. Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major public health issue that is frequently underestimated. The primary objective of this multicenter study was to identify patients at risk for VTE, and to define the rate of patients receiving appropriate prophylaxis in the regions of Kazakhstan.Materials and methods. Standardized case report forms were filled by trained medical doctors on one predefined day in selected hospitals. Data were analyzed by independent biostatistician. Risk of VTE was categorized according to Caprini score which was recommended by 2004 American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines.Results. 432 patients from 4 regions of Kazakhstan; 169 (39.10%) medical patients and 263 (60.9%) surgical patients were eligible for the study. Patients were at low (10%), moderate (19.2%), high (33.6%) and very high risk (37.3%) for VTE. The main risk factors (RF) of VTE among hospitalized patients were heart failure (HF), obesity, prolonged bed rest, and the presence of acute non-infective inflammation. From total number of hospitalized patients with RF with indications to VTE prophylaxis, 58.1% of patients received pharmacological prophylaxis and only 24.6% of them received VTE prophylaxis according ACCP. On the other hand, 23.5% patients with the risk of VTE but who were not eligible for it received pharmacological prophylaxis.Conclusion. These results indicate the existence of inconsistency between eligibility for VTE prophylaxis on one hand and its application in practice (p < 0.001). Risk factors for VTE and eligibility for VTE prophylaxis are common, but VTE prophylaxis and guidelines application are low.

Post Discharge Clinically Overt Venous Thromboembolism in Orthopaedic Surgery Patients with Negative Venography -an Overview Analysis

1996 ◽  
Vol 76 (06) ◽  
pp. 0887-0892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena Ricotta ◽  
Alfonso lorio ◽  
Pasquale Parise ◽  
Giuseppe G Nenci ◽  
Giancarlo Agnelli
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Orthopaedic Surgery ◽  
Diagnostic Methods ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Post Discharge ◽  
Pharmacological Prophylaxis ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Overview Analysis ◽  
Major Orthopaedic Surgery

SummaryA high incidence of post-discharge venous thromboembolism in orthopaedic surgery patients has been recently reported drawing further attention to the unresolved issue of the optimal duration of the pharmacological prophylaxis. We performed an overview analysis in order to evaluate the incidence of late occurring clinically overt venous thromboembolism in major orthopaedic surgery patients discharged from the hospital with a negative venography and without further pharmacological prophylaxis. We selected the studies published from January 1974 to December 1995 on the prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism after major orthopaedic surgery fulfilling the following criteria: 1) adoption of pharmacological prophylaxis, 2) performing of a bilateral venography before discharge, 3) interruption of pharmacological prophylaxis at discharge in patients with negative venography, and 4) post-discharge follow-up of the patients for at least four weeks. Out of 31 identified studies, 13 fulfilled the overview criteria. The total number of evaluated patients was 4120. An adequate venography was obtained in 3469 patients (84.1%). In the 2361 patients with negative venography (68.1%), 30 episodes of symptomatic venous thromboembolism after hospital discharge were reported with a resulting cumulative incidence of 1.27% (95% C.I. 0.82-1.72) and a weighted mean incidence of 1.52% (95% C.I. 1.05-1.95). Six cases of pulmonary embolism were reported. Our overview showed a low incidence of clinically overt venous thromboembolism at follow-up in major orthopaedic surgery patients discharged with negative venography. Extending pharmacological prophylaxis in these patients does not appear to be justified. Venous thrombi leading to hospital re-admission are likely to be present but asymptomatic at the time of discharge. Future research should be directed toward improving the accuracy of non invasive diagnostic methods in order to replace venography in the screening of asymptomatic post-operative deep vein thrombosis.

Inter-observer reliability of a risk assessment model for venous thromboembolism in acutely-ill medical hospitalized patients: Results from a prospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
pp. 026835552110212
Author(s):  
Cassia RL Ferreira ◽  
Marcos de Bastos ◽  
Mirella L Diniz ◽  
Renan A Mancini ◽  
Yan S Raposo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Risk Classification ◽  
Assessment Model ◽  
Kappa Statistics ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Observer Reliability

Objectives To analyze the inter-observer reliability of risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE) in a population of adult acutely-ill medical patients. Methods In this prospective cohort study, we collected risk factors and risk classification for VTE using RAM IMPROVE7. Kappa statistics was used to evaluate inter-observer reliability between lead clinicians and trained researchers. We evaluated occurrence of VTE in patients with mismatched classification. Results We included 2,380 patients, median age 70 years (interquartile range [IQR], 58-79), 56.2% female. Adjusted Kappa for VTE risk factors ranged from substantial (0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61-0.67) for “immobilization”, to almost perfect (0.98; 95% CI 0.97-0.99) for “thrombophilia”; risk classification was 0.64 (95% CI 0.60-0.67). Divergent risk classification occurred in 434 patients (18.2%) of whom seven (1.6%) developed VTE. Conclusion Despite substantial to almost perfect reliability between observers for risk factors and risk classification, lead clinicians tended to underestimate the risk for VTE.

Disease burden and unmet needs for prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients in Europe show underutilisation of preventive therapies

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 600-608 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharon Welner ◽  
Maria Kubin ◽  
Kerstin Folkerts ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
Hanane Khoury
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Considerable Proportion ◽  
Medical Illness ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Vte Prophylaxis ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Medical Inpatients ◽  
Clear Identification

SummaryIt was the aim of this review to assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and current practice patterns for VTE prophylaxis among medical patients with acute illness in Europe. A literature search was conducted on the epidemiology and prophylaxis practices of VTE prevention among adult patients treated in-hospital for major medical conditions. A total of 21 studies with European information published between 1999 and April 2010 were retrieved. Among patients hospitalised for an acute medical illness, the incidence of VTE varied between 3.65% (symptomatic only over 10.9 days) and 14.9% (asymptomatic and symptomatic over 14 days). While clinical guidelines recommend pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for patients admitted to hospital with an acute medical illness who are bedridden, clear identification of specific risk groups who would benefit from VTE prophylaxis is lacking. In the majority of studies retrieved, prophylaxis was under-used among medical inpatients; 21% to 62% of all patients admitted to the hospital for acute medical illnesses did not receive VTE prophylaxis. Furthermore, among patients who did receive prophylaxis, a considerable proportion received medication that was not in accord with guidelines due to short duration, suboptimal dose, or inappropriate type of prophylaxis. In most cases, the duration of VTE prophylaxis did not exceed hospital stay, the mean duration of which varied between 5 and 11 days. In conclusion, despite demonstrated efficacy and established guidelines supporting VTE prophylaxis, utilisation rates and treatment duration remain suboptimal, leaving medical patients at continued risk for VTE. Improved guideline adherence and effective care delivery among the medically ill are stressed.

scholarly journals Prevention of venous thromboembolism in hospitalized patients with chronic kidney disease

2013 ◽  
pp. 269-276
Author(s):  
Marcora Mandreoli ◽  
Antonio Santoro
Keyword(s):  
Renal Failure ◽  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Renal Disease ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Current Evidence ◽  
High Morbidity ◽  
Medical Patients ◽  
Medically Ill ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Therapeutic Doses

Despite the high morbidity and mortality associated with venous thromboembolism in hospitalized medical patients with a number of risk factors, and large evidence that prophylaxis is effective, prophylaxis rates remain elusive in medically ill patients. Furthermore, in patients with renal failure, prophylaxis often is omitted or sub-optimal, due to fear of provoking hemorrhage. Patients with end-stage renal disease often have platelet deficits. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) therapy may also be difficult to manage in these cases because LMWH clearance is largely dependent on the kidneys. Administration of LMWH to patients with some degree of renal failure may lead to bioaccumulation of anti-Xa activity with an increased risk of bleeding. In recent years, LMWH has largely replaced unfractionated heparin (UFH) for the treatment and prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease. LMWHs have been shown to be superior to UFH in the prevention of venous thromboembolism. They are also easier to administer and do not require laboratory monitoring. However, several case reports and a metaanalysis indicate that the use of LMWHs at therapeutic doses in patients with advanced renal failure can be associated with major bleeding with serious adverse effects. In this paper, we review recent evidence supporting the safety of LMWHs at prophylactic doses in patients with mild or moderate renal disease. Current evidence suggests that bioaccumulation of enoxaparin (the most widely used LMWH) can occur when the drug is used at standard therapeutic doses in patients with severely impaired renal function. This risk can be reduced by empiric dose reduction or monitoring of anti-Xa heparin levels.

Venous thromboembolism in acutely ill hospitalized medical patients

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel Barba ◽  
Antonio Zapatero ◽  
Juan E. Losa ◽  
Javier Marco ◽  
Susana Plaza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Medical Patients

Primary prevention of venous thromboembolism

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (2_suppl) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
R S Figueiredo ◽  
G Stansby ◽  
V Bhattacharya
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Arterial Disease ◽  
Low Molecular Weight ◽  
Compression Stockings ◽  
Low Molecular Weight Heparins ◽  
Pharmacological Prophylaxis ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Peripheral Arterial ◽  
Orally Active ◽  
Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is the most common cause of preventable in-hospital mortality and all hospitalized patients should be VTE risk assessed. The VTE risk should be weighed up against risk of bleeding on an individualized basis to guide choice of prophylaxis. The most common method of mechanical thromboprophylaxis is graduated compression stockings, although others, such as intermittent pneumatic devices, are available. Stockings have the greatest benefit when used in combination with pharmacological prophylaxis. However, stockings are contraindicated in some patients, including those with stroke or peripheral arterial disease. Various options for pharmacological thromboprophylaxis are available. The most commonly used agents are the low-molecular-weight heparins, but newer orally active agents may play an increasing role in the future.

Assessment of venous thromboembolism risk and the benefits of thromboprophylaxis in medical patients

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander T. Cohen ◽  
Raza Alikhan ◽  
Juan I. Arcelus ◽  
Jean-François Bergmann ◽  
Sylvia Haas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Venous Thromboembolism ◽  
Medical Patients
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document