scholarly journals Testing the Fairness of a Coin by Akaike's Information Criterion

Author(s):  
Kunio Takezawa

In this paper, AIC (Akaike's Information Criterion) is used to judge whether a coin is biased or not using the sequence of heads and tails produced by tossing the coin several times. It is well known that AIC·(−0:5) is an efficient estimator of the expected log-likelihood when the true distribution is contained in a specified parametric model. In the coin tossing problem, however, AIC·(−0:5) works as an efficient estimator even if the true distribution is not contained in a specied parametric model. Moreover, the judgement of fairness of coin using AIC is equivalent to a statistical test using the Bernoulli distribution with a signicance level ranging from 11% to 18%. This indicates that the judgement of the fairness of coin based on AIC leads to a higher probability of type I errors than that given by a statistical test with a signicance level of 5%. These findings show that we judge the fairness of a coin based on AIC when we do not have any prior knowledge about its fairness and we want to judge it from the standpoint of prediction. In contrast, a statistical test with a significance level of 5% is adopted when we have prior knowledge that the coin is probably unbiased. Moreover, a statistical test with a 5% significance level allows us to conclude that the coin is biased if we obtain sufficient evidence that permits us to disbelieve the prior knowledge.

2003 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Kadota ◽  
Shin-Ichiro Nishimura ◽  
Hidemasa Bono ◽  
Shugo Nakamura ◽  
Yoshihide Hayashizaki ◽  
...  

We applied a method based on Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) to detect genes whose expression profile is considerably different in some tissue(s) than in others. Such observations are detected as outliers, and the method we used was originally developed to detect outliers. The main advantage of the method is that objective decisions are possible because the procedure is independent of a significance level. We applied the method to 48 expression ratios corresponding to various tissues in each of 14,610 clones obtained from the RIKEN Expression Array Database (READ; http://read.gsc.riken.go.jp ). As a result, for several tissues (e.g., muscle, heart, and tongue tissues that contain similar cell types) we objectively obtained specific clones without any “thresholding.” Our study demonstrates the feasibility of the method for detecting tissue-specific gene expression patterns.


1990 ◽  
Vol 29 (03) ◽  
pp. 200-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Koziol

AbstractA basic problem of cluster analysis is the determination or selection of the number of clusters evinced in any set of data. We address this issue with multinomial data using Akaike’s information criterion and demonstrate its utility in identifying an appropriate number of clusters of tumor types with similar profiles of cell surface antigens.


2003 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rick L. Andrews ◽  
Imran S. Currim

Despite the widespread application of finite mixture models in marketing research, the decision of how many segments to retain in the models is an important unresolved issue. Almost all applications of the models in marketing rely on segment retention criteria such as Akaike's information criterion, Bayesian information criterion, consistent Akaike's information criterion, and information complexity to determine the number of latent segments to retain. Because these applications employ real-world data in which the true number of segments is unknown, it is not clear whether these criteria are effective. Retaining the true number of segments is crucial because many product design and marketing decisions depend on it. The purpose of this extensive simulation study is to determine how well commonly used segment retention criteria perform in the context of simulated multinomial choice data, as obtained from supermarket scanner panels, in which the true number of segments is known. The authors find that an Akaike's information criterion with a penalty factor of three rather than the traditional value of two has the highest segment retention success rate across nearly all experimental conditions. Currently, this criterion is rarely, if ever, applied in the marketing literature. Experimental factors of particular interest in marketing contexts, such as the number of choices per household, the number of choice alternatives, the error variance of the choices, and the minimum segment size, have not been considered in the statistics literature. The authors show that they, among other factors, affect the performance of segment retention criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document