scholarly journals A Prospective Comparative Study: Stapler Hemorrhoidopexy vs Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty in the Treatment of Hemorrhoids

2020 ◽  
pp. 10-23
Author(s):  
Anshuman Kaushal ◽  
Aakanksha Aggarwal ◽  
Amanpriya Khanna ◽  
Rajesh Agarwal ◽  
Dhruv N. Kundra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Severe Postoperative Pain ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Grade Ii ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2

Aims: Stapler hemorrhoidopexy (SH) has evolved over time as a procedure of choice over conventional surgery due to less postoperative pain. Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) is a novel procedure aimed at shrinking the terminal branches of hemorrhoidal arteries with fewer complications. The present study is aimed to compare these procedures (SH and LH). Study Design: Prospective comparative study. Place and Duration of Study: Patients operated for hemorrhoids at the Department of General, MI & Bariatric Surgery, Artemis Hospitals, Gurgaon from April 2018 to March 2019. Methodology: 50 patients with grade II-III hemorrhoids were allocated to two groups: Stapler hemorrhoidopexy (SH) and Laser hemorrhoidoplasty (LH) with 25 patients in each group. Results were compared and patients were followed up for minimum period of 3 months. Results: The mean operative time was 24.6 min (LH) and 28.6 min (SH) (P =.122). The average blood loss was 8.32 ml (LH) and 11.64 ml (SH) (P <.05). The mean hospital stay 21.44 hours (LH) and 32.64 hours (SH) (P <.05). Mean postoperative pain score (VAS) at 12 hours was 2.64 (LH) and 4.76 (SH) (P <.05), at 24 hours was 1.88 (LH) and 3.6 (SH) (P <.05), at 1 week was 0.36 (LH) and 0.88 (SH) (P =.054) and at 3 months 0.04 (LH) and 0.12 (SH) (P =.53). One patient in LH (4%) had postoperative bleeding on 4th postoperative day. In SH group, 2 (8%) had severe postoperative pain with VAS > 8, requiring longer hospital stay, 2 (8%) had bleeding on the same day, 1 (4%) had bleeding on follow up and 1 (4%) had recurrence. Conclusion: In terms of early postoperative pain and complications, LH offers better results as compared to SH. It was associated with a shorter hospital stay and early return to work. No significant complications were noted in LH compared to SH. LH is an extremely viable alternative to the popular SH for grade II-III hemorrhoids.

scholarly journals Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Jordan

2001 ◽  
Vol 7 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 838-840
Author(s):  
A. Al Raymoony
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy ◽  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Return To Work ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Safe Procedure ◽  
Short Hospital Stay ◽  
Early Return ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time

This study was conducted on 100 patients with symptomatic gallbladder stones, aged 22-81 years with a mean of 51.5 years, who underwent cholecystectomy in Zarqa city, Jordan between July 1998 and July 1999. The success rate was 87% and the procedure was completed using the conventional method in 13 patients. The mean operative time was 60 minutes, complication rate was 5% and there were no deaths. The mean hospital stay was 1 day and mean time to return to work was 10 days. This study showed that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe procedure with reasonable operative time, less postoperative pain, a short hospital stay, early return to work, and a low morbidity and mortality rate.

scholarly journals Stapled haemorrhoidectomy versus openhaemorrhoidectomy: a prospective comparative study

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
R S Bhandari ◽  
P J Lakhey ◽  
Y P Singh ◽  
P R Mishra ◽  
K P Singh
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Operating Time ◽  
Symptom Duration ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Short Term Outcome ◽  
Early Return ◽  
Sh Group ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study

Open haemorrhoidectomy (OH) treatment has been reserved for prolapsing haemorrhoidal disease (third and fourth grade) and comprehends excision of haemorrhoidal tissue and is associated with significant postoperative pain. As an alternative approach, many randomized controlled trials have shown consistent advantage with haemorrhoidopexy (SH) in terms of postoperative pain, analgesic requirement, length of surgical procedure, short recovery time and early return to normal activities. This study has been conducted to compare the short-term outcome of SH with OH. A prospective comparative study, which included grade 3 and 4 haemorrhoids and comparing short Term outcomes between SH and OH was conducted in the Surgical Gastroenterology units of University Teaching Hospital. A total 44 patients, 22 in each group were compared. Age (SH 42±10.80 Vs. OH 45±13.30) and sex (SH, M:F-9:13 Vs. OH, M:F-14:8) distribution was comparable. Also, the groups were comparable in terms of symptom duration in years (SH, 3.20±2.26 Vs. OH, 2.31±2.47) and distribution of haemorrhoid grades. The SH group showed significant advantage in terms of postoperative pain (Average pain score SH, 2.73±1.20 Vs. OH, 5.20±1.91) and analgesic use (SH 2.32±0.94 Vs. OH 9.32±2.62). Similarly the operating time (time in minutes SH, 42±7.34 Vs. OH, 57.50±8.27), hospitals stay (days of stay SH, 2.90±0.68 Vs. OH, 3.77±0.86) and return to preoperative activity (days to return SH, 7.9±4.90 Vs. OH, 13.6±5.60) were also significantly shorter in the SH group than the OH group. The short-term complications were similar in both groups (P value >0.05). In conclusion, SH has better short-term outcome compared with OH and SH is a viable addition to the therapy options available for haemorrhoids.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jcmc.v4i4.11956

scholarly journals STAPLER HAEMORRHOIDECTOMY

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (01) ◽  
pp. 113-118
Author(s):  
SAJID SHIEKH ◽  
FAKHAR HAMEED ◽  
MUHAMMAD KHALID NASEEM MIRZA ◽  
Muhammad Afzal
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Urinary Retention ◽  
Postoperative Bleeding ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Visual Analogue Score ◽  
Daily Basis ◽  
Pelvic Sepsis ◽  
The Mean

Objectives: To demonstrate advantages of staplerhaemorrhoidectomy and its applicability to all patients who require surgical treatment of haemorrhoids. Design: CaseDescriptive Study. Place & Duration of study: Allied/DHQ Hospitals, Faisalabad. (February 2004 – July 2005).Patients & methods: A total of 20 patients having grade III or IV haemorrhoids were included in the study. After adetailed GIT history, patients were subjected to standard stapler haemorrhoidectomy under regional anaesthesia.Patients were asked to record the postoperative pain intensity according to visual analogue score ranging from (0-10)on daily basis and the drugs required for pain control noticed. Patients were followed at weekly intervals for one month.Main outcome measures were postoperative pain, bleeding, sepsis, urinary retention, continence, relief of preoperativesymptoms, operation time, hospital stay & recovery time. Results: Pain was the most common postoperativecomplication affecting 18 patients (90 %age).There was significant reduction in postoperative pain except for onepatient in which pain was severe (VAS=8) due to technical error. Two patients developed urinary retention on the dayof surgery. Postoperative bleeding was not observed in any of the patients. Pelvic sepsis & incontinence was not foundin any patient. Preoperative symptoms were resolved in majority of the cases (80%age) with marked improvement inthe rest(20 %age). The mean operative time was 17 minutes & mean hospital stay 1.3 days. Most patients were backto their work after 11 post operative day. Conclusions: th Stapler Haemorrhoidectomy is a simple, quick & safeprocedure that gives benefit in terms of reducing the postoperative complications namely pain & its sequelae with earlyreturn to activity. The vast majority of patients currently undergoing conventional surgical haemorrhoidectomy wouldbe suitable for stapler approach, however the long term benefits need to be evaluated.

A Comparative Study of Endoscopic Coblation Adenoidectomy and Regular Curettage Adenoidectomy in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Kerala

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (41) ◽  
pp. 3559-3566
Author(s):  
Abdul Salam R. T. ◽  
Shahul Hameed A. ◽  
Meera Rajan
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Operation Time ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Adenoid Tissue ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Tube Function ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Mean

BACKGROUND An ideal surgery to remove hypertrophied adenoid mass should be safe, with less bleeding and operation time along with post-operative improvement in the eustachian tubal ventilation and normal respiration. It should also have low morbidity and mortality. Among the various methods described for its removal, the two commonly used methods are conventional cold curettage method and coblation technique. The purpose of this study was to collate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic coblation adenoidectomy with the conventional curettage adenoidectomy. METHODS A prospective comparative study with fifty patients was studied who underwent adenoidectomy. Twenty five patients underwent endoscopy assisted coblation adenoidectomy and twenty five patients underwent regular adenoidectomy by curettage. RESULTS Patients who underwent coblation adenoidectomy showed better results during follow up in terms of completeness of removal. 80 % of children undergoing regular adenoidectomy by curettage method showed remnant adenoid tissue in the nasopharynx at the end of the procedure. But it was 6 % among the children undergoing endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. The mean duration of operation was higher for endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy which was significant statistically. The mean blood loss was 30.36 ml in regular curettage adenoidectomy; 10.6 ml with endoscopic coblation adenoidectomy. The grading of pain was significantly lower in endoscopic assisted coblation adenoidectomy. There was no significant difference between two groups in terms of eustachian tube function after surgery. CONCLUSIONS Coblation adenoidectomy has significant advantages over conventional adenoidectomy in terms of completeness of removal, reduced blood loss, and lower post-operative pain grade. KEYWORDS Coblation, Adenoidectomy, Curettage, Haemorrhage and Complications

scholarly journals Reduction of the Risk of Relapse of Symptoms When Using Esophagoprotector in Patients Requiring Temporary Cancellation of Antisecretory Therapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 26-30
Author(s):  
Yu.A. Kucheryavy ◽  
◽  
P.R. Movtaeva ◽  
D.N. Andreev ◽  
R.I. Shaburov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Underlying Disease ◽  
On Demand ◽  
Long Time ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Significant Regression ◽  
Risk Of Relapse ◽  
Group 1

Objective: to evaluate the effectiveness of an esophagoprotector in reducing the risk of recurrent symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in patients who requiring temporary cancellation of therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Material and methods. For the prospective comparative study there were selectively chose patients who had been taking PPIs for a long time (at least one month) for the underlying disease and who required temporary discontinuation of antisecretory therapy due to objective medical reasons. The study included patients with endoscopically and/or pH-metrically verified GERD, as well as histologically verified Barrett's esophagus. In the process of randomization of patients, two equal groups were formed, depending on the therapy received at the time of PPI withdrawal: group 1 received antacids on demand, group 2 received antacids on demand, as well as the esophagoprotector Alfasoxx at a dose of 10 ml four times a day (after each meal and at night). The follow-up period was two weeks. The patients recorded episodes of heartburn in their personal diaries. Results. The study included 60 patients (28 men and 32 women). The average age of the examined patients was 43.1 ± 5.3 years. By the end of the two-week follow-up period, the frequency of recurrent symptoms in group 1 was 36.7%, while in group 2 it was 13.3%. The use of the esophagoprotector Alfasoxx contributed to the significant regression of the risk of heartburn recurrence (odds ratio 0.2657; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07328-0.9637; p = 0.0438) in comparison with the group of patients who received only antacids in the on-demand mode. When analyzing the population of patients who had relapsed symptoms, it was demonstrated that the average number of heartburn episodes in group 1 was 6.18 (95% CI 4,1930-8,1706), and in group 2 – 4.50 (95% CI 0,7121-8,2879). Conclusion. This prospective comparative study demonstrated that the use of the esophagoprotector Alfasoxx helps to reduce the risk of relapse of GERD symptoms in patients requiring temporary cancellation of PPI therapy.

Effect of Colostomy on Treatment Outcome in Fournier Gangrene: A Prospective Comparative Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110247
Author(s):  
Barakat Abdelreheem Mahmood ◽  
Emad Hussein ElSayed ◽  
Sherif Abdalla Ali
Keyword(s):  
Wound Healing ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Wound Dehiscence ◽  
Inhospital Mortality ◽  
Perianal Region ◽  
Fournier Gangrene ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
The Difference

Background and Aim: Value of colostomy in management of Fournier gangrene (FG) is a debatable issue. Almost all relevant studies are retrospective and included heterogeneous patients’ groups. The present prospective study aimed to evaluate the role of colostomy in management of FG affecting the perianal region in 2 well-matched FG groups. Patients and Methods: The present prospective comparative study included 30 patients with FG associated with extensive involvement of the perianal region. They comprised 15 patients subjected to colostomy and other 15 patients who refused to perform the procedure. Colostomy was performed after the first debridement. Outcome parameters in the present study included time to wound healing, length of hospital stay, and inhospital mortality. Results: Comparison between the studied groups regarding the preoperative characteristics revealed no statistically significant differences. Postoperatively, patients in the colostomy group had significantly fewer number of debridements (1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.7 ± 1.2, P < .001), shorter hospital stay (9.5 ± 3.3 vs 29.9 ± 6.2 days, P < .001), and significantly shorter time to wound healing (16.5 ± 3.9 vs 42.9 ± 6.9 days, P < .001). Also, patients in the colostomy group had significantly lower rate of wound dehiscence, wound infection, and flap ischemia. However, the difference wasn’t statistically significant. Conclusions: Aggressive treatment of FG aided by colostomy after first debridement would result in better clinical outcome.

A COMPARATIVE STUDY TO EVALUATE THE OUTCOME OF PONSETI'S TECHNIQUE AND ACCELERATED PONSETI'S TECHNIQUE FOR CORRECTION OF CLUBFOOT

2021 ◽  
pp. 59-61
Author(s):  
Ashok Vidhyarthi ◽  
H.S. Varma ◽  
Rajeev Singh ◽  
Rajendra Thakur ◽  
Darwin Kumar Thakur
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Ponseti Method ◽  
Congenital Deformity ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Protocol Group ◽  
Pirani Score ◽  
Prospective Comparative Study ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Accelerated Ponseti ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: Clubfoot is a common congenital deformity with incidence of1-6.8/1000 live births. Ponseti method is currently the gold standard for treatment of clubfoot which conventionally involves weekly plaster changes. A prospective comparative study was carried out at our hospital where we compared one group with weekly plaster change to other group with twice weekly plaster change, using the classical Ponseti protocol of manipulation. A total 50 feet (36 children ), divided into two Methods: groups, were randomly allocated to either Group 1 – 25 feet(accelerated Ponseti) or Group 2 – 25 feet (standard Ponseti). Group 2 underwent serial manipulations and casting once a week and Group 1 received manipulations and castings twice a week. Pirani score was documented at the time of presentation, after each cast, and at the time of removalof nal cast to assess the success of treatment ( Pirani score ≤1). A tota Results: l 43 feet (29 patients) underwent the entire course of treatment, while 7 patients discontinued the treatment during the course of the study. 14 patients, i.e, 21 feet were treated with Accelerated Ponseti Protocol (APP),i.e Group -1, and 15 patients, i.e, 22 feet were treated with Standard Ponseti Protocol (SPP), i.e Group-2. Mean duration of treatment from the rst cast to tenotomy in the accelerated ponseti protocol group was 20.57 ± 4.5 days (ranging from 12 to 29 days), and in standard ponseti protocol group was 39.66 ± 6.9 days (ranging from 29 to 51 days). Conclusion: Both the methods proved to be equally efcacious for the management of clubfoot in our study. However, the accelerated method had an overall shorter treatment duration making it convenient for the parents. As the patient is under direct observation of surgeons, complications, in any, are detected early and easily. Overall, the accelerated technique is more practical, benecial, and equally efcacious as standard ponseti technique, providing a more rapid correction of the deformity.

scholarly journals Topical Nitroglycerine Versus Lateral Sphincterectomy for Fissure in Ano: A Hospital Based Comparative Study

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-43
Author(s):  
Bimarsh Adhikari ◽  
Sunil Kumar Yadav ◽  
S. N. Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
College Teaching ◽  
Pain Reduction ◽  
Lateral Sphincterotomy ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Benign Condition ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Anal fissure is a common benign condition presenting as severe pain, constipations and bleeding per rectum. It is defined as longitudinal tear or defect in anal canal skin. Surgical treatment of this conditions requires hospital admission and complications, like bleeding, infection and to its severe extent continence disturbances. That warrants a new treatment modality as pharmacological sphincterotomy i. e topical GTN (glycerine trinitrate) whose effects are reversible, cost effective and simple. Objective: The objective is to compare the effectiveness of topical GTN over lateral sphincterotomy in terms of pain management and healing of fissure. Method: This was a comparative study carried out in the department of Surgery at Nepalgunj Medical College, Teaching Hospital. Two groups were created and 25 patients in each group were put randomly. First group (Group 1) used topical GTN whereas second group(Group 2) underwent lateral sphincterotomy for treatment of fissure. The two groups were reassessed at 4 and 8 weeks for pain and fissure healing. Result: Total number of patients was 50. Each group consisted of 25 patients. The male to female ratio in group 1 was 1:1.5 and in group 2 it was 1: 1.8. In group 1 patients after 4 weeks of application of GTN pain reduced from the mean of 80±15 at the time of presentation to 50±9.27. When these patients were seen after 8 weeks, the pain reduction on VAS was nil in 21 patients out of 25. In group 2 the mean score fell from 75±15 to 20±10 after 4 weeks and at 8weeks 23 out of 25 patients didn't have any pain. It was observed that the pain reduction and healing were faster in group 2 patients when evaluated after 4 weeks (p=0.0029). but at the end of 8 weeks both group patients were similar in terms of pain reduction and healing of fissure (p=.28). Conclusion: According to study local GTN application is as effective as lateral sphincterotomy with cost effectiveness, simple with tolerable side effect and no continence disturbances.

scholarly journals Comparative study of laparoscopic hernia repair versus open hernia repair

2018 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 30-34
Author(s):  
Rohit Prasad Yadav ◽  
Dipendra Thakur ◽  
Bashu Dev Baskota ◽  
Amit Kumar Shah ◽  
Kaushal Samsher Thapa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Hernia Repair ◽  
Fatty Tissue ◽  
Duration Of Surgery ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Lower Pain Score ◽  
Open Hernia Repair ◽  
Group 1

 Background: Hernia is the abnormal exit of an organ or fatty tissue, such as the bowel, through the weak wall of the cavity in which it normally resides. Repair of inguinal hernia is common surgical  procedures. This study aims to compare between laparoscopic and open hernia repair. Method: Study is non randomized comparative study. Study includes 76 patients who had undergone surgery for hernioplasty. Among them 38 undergone laparoscopic hernioplasty and 38 undergone open hernioplasty from June 2016 to August 2018. Results: Mean hospital stay was 2.95 days in group 1 and 4.03 in group 2 .VAS was found to be 2.45 in group 1 and 5.71 in group 2 which is significantly low in group 1 patients with p<0.001. Duration of surgery is more in group 1 with mean duration of 94.08 minutes comparing to group 2 with mean duration of 43.55 minutes (with p<0.001). Conclusion: Laparoscopic hernia repair offers advantages over open repair in terms of less hospital stay and lower pain score for patient not contraindicated for general anesthesia and complicated hernia.

scholarly journals Outcomes of Retrograde Intra-Renal Surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 220-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samir Shrestha ◽  
Pukar Maskey
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Renal Stone ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Renal Calculi ◽  
Renal Surgery ◽  
Surgical Morbidity ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Stone Clearance ◽  
The Mean

Introduction: Miniaturization of endoscopic instruments has gained wide popularity in the treatment of renal calculi. Retrograde intra-renal surgery and holmium laser in combination has already proven its superiority when compared to other modalities in the treatment of renal calculi. This study was conducted to assess the outcome of retrograde intra-renal surgery in renal stone disease.Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the outcome of retrograde intra-renal surgery in renal stone less than 2 cm size in the adults above 18 years of age from September 2018 to August 2019 at Patan Hospital, Nepal. The outcome was assessed descriptively on postoperative pain and fever, stone localization, stone size, stone clearance, urosepsis, operative time, hospital stay, mortality, need of the second procedure.Results: A total of 62 patients underwent retrograde intrarenal surgery, out of which 48 cases were included. The mean age of the study population was 32.4± 14 years (19-68 years). Similarly, the mean operative time was 68± 12 (48-124 minutes) and mean hospital-stay was 3.2± 1.1 days. Postoperative pain and fever were observed in 14 (29.16%) & 4(8.33%) patients respectively. Hematuria occurred in 6(12.50%) and urosepsis in 2(4.16%) of the patients. Complete stone clearance was achieved in 34(70.83%) and residual stones were present in 8(16.66%) and clinically insignificant radiological fragments were present in 6(12.50%) patients.Conclusions: Retrograde intrarenal surgery is a technically safe and effective procedure for the treatment of renal calculi, with minimal post-surgical morbidity.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document