plastic wave
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

138
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Vol 63 (5) ◽  
pp. 731-737
Author(s):  
S. A. Barannikova ◽  
Yu. V. Li

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (49) ◽  
pp. 243-256
Author(s):  
Yuriy Bayandin ◽  
Natalia Saveleva ◽  
Oleg Naimark

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019.32 (0) ◽  
pp. 208
Author(s):  
Kenichi TANIGAKI ◽  
Keitaro HORIKAWA ◽  
Hidetoshi KOBAYASHI

Author(s):  
H Ockendon ◽  
J R Ockendon ◽  
P D Howell ◽  
S J Thomson

Materials ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 1215
Author(s):  
Yehui Cui ◽  
Xiangguo Zeng ◽  
Huayan Chen ◽  
Jun Chen ◽  
Fang Wang

Based on irreversible thermodynamic theory, a new constitutive model incorporating two internal variables was proposed to investigate the phase transformation and plasticity behavior in nickel-titanium (NiTi) shape memory alloys (SMAs), by taking into account four deformation stages, namely austenite elastic phase, phase transition, martensitic elastic phase, and plastic phase. The model using the material point method (MPM) was implemented by the FORTRAN code to investigate the stress wave and its propagation in a NiTi rod. The results showed that its wave propagation exhibited martensitic and austenitic elastic wave, phase transition wave, and plastic wave. However, a double-wave structure including the martensitic and austenitic elastic wave and plastic wave occurred when the martensitic elastic wave reached the phase transformation wave. Thus, the reflection wave at a fixed boundary exhibited a different behavior compared with the elastic one, which was attributed to the phase transition during the process of reflection. It was found that the stress increment was proportional to the velocity of phase transition wave after the stress wave reflection. In addition, the influences of loading direction and strain rate on the wave propagation were examined as well. It was found that the phase transition wave velocity increased as the strain rate increased. The elastic wave velocity of martensite under compressive conditions was larger than that under tensile loading. In contrast, the plastic wave velocity under compression was less than that subjected to the tensile load.


Shock Waves ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 451-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hallajisany ◽  
J. Zamani ◽  
M. Seyed Salehi ◽  
J. Albelda Vitoria

2015 ◽  
Vol 94 ◽  
pp. 04047
Author(s):  
Kenichi Tanigaki ◽  
Toru Idouji ◽  
Keitaro Horikawa ◽  
Hidetoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Kinya Ogawa

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015.28 (0) ◽  
pp. _180-1_-_180-2_
Author(s):  
Kenichi TANIGAKI ◽  
Keitaro HORIKAWA ◽  
Hidetoshi KOBAYASHI ◽  
Kinya OGAWA

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014.27 (0) ◽  
pp. 779-780
Author(s):  
Kenichi Tanigaki ◽  
Toru Idoji ◽  
Keitaro Horikawa ◽  
Hidetoshi Kobayashi ◽  
Kinya Ogawa

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document