fluvial architecture
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

89
(FIVE YEARS 16)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

Author(s):  
Augusto Nicolás Varela ◽  
Luis Miguel Yeste ◽  
César Viseras ◽  
Fernando García-García ◽  
Damián Moyano Paz

2021 ◽  
pp. 105924
Author(s):  
Monica Oliveira Manna ◽  
Claiton Marlon dos Santos Scherer ◽  
Manoela Bettarel Bállico ◽  
Adriano Domingos dos Reis ◽  
Lucas Vargas Moraes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Wooldridge ◽  
Robert Duller ◽  
Rhodri Jerrett ◽  
Kyle Straub

<p>Basin-scale fluvial architecture is, to a large extent, determined by the ability of river systems to migrate and avulse across their own floodplain. River avulsion takes place when a river aggrades by one channel depth to achieve super-elevation above the surrounding floodplain. However, peat enhancement of floodplain aggradation is likely to affect this fluvial behaviour and has received little attention. The interaction between river channels and peat-dominated floodplains is likely to have the effect of inhibiting or prolonging the conditions required for river avulsion, and so will impact on basin scale architecture during prolonged peat accumulation on floodplains. To elucidate and quantify the nature of this channel-floodplain interaction we investigate the coal-bearing clastic interval of the Carboniferous Pikeville Formation, Central Appalachian Basin, USA. Using a combination of well data and outcrop data, two coal horizons and intervening sand bodies, were mapped across an area of 5700 km<sup>2</sup> to ascertain overall basin-scale architecture. Comparison of the accumulation rate of the coal units (corrected for decompaction) with the synchronously deposited sand bodies suggests that extensive and rapid peat accumulation can increase avulsion timescales by 3 orders of magnitude and dramatically alter basin-scale fluvial architecture.</p>


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hans von Suchodoletz ◽  
Christoph Zielhofer ◽  
Mathias Ulrich ◽  
Azra Khosravichenar ◽  
Jan Miera ◽  
...  

<p>Fluvial sediments are valuable archives of late Quaternary landscape evolution, paleoenvironmental changes and human-environmental interactions. However, given their complex and non-linear character their correct interpretation requires a good understanding of the fluvial architecture. The fluvial architecture describes the spatial arrangement and genetic interconnectedness of different types of fluvial sediments in a floodplain such as channel and overbank deposits. To properly map the different fluvial forms, their variations in composition and geometry must be understood in three dimensions. However, whereas investigations of the fluvial architecture are relatively easy in cohesive floodplain types with incised channel beds and large natural exposures, these are challenging in floodplains with buried stratigraphies where artificial exposures or corings are required.</p><p>We studied three cross sections through the floodplain of the middle and upper course of the Weiße Elster River in Central Germany by means of geophysical Electrical Resistivity Measurements (ERT) and closely spaced drillings. These 2D investigations were complemented by spatial geophysical 3D measurements of Electromagnetic Induction (EMI) in the surrounding areas of the cross sections. The latter technique allows fast mapping of larger areas, and was only rarely applied to fluvial systems so far. Our novel and cost-effective combination of core drillings with multidimensional geophysical measurements allowed to systematically reconstruct the fluvial architecture of larger areas of the Weiße Elster floodplain with high resolution, and thereby demonstrates its high value for fluvial geomorphology. Furthermore, in combination with ongoing numerical datings of the fluvial sediments these investigations form the base for precise conclusions about possible climatic and human drivers of the Holocene fluvial dynamics of the Weiße Elster River.</p>


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emese M. Bordy ◽  
Francisco Paiva

The main Karoo Basin of southern Africa contains the continental record of the end-Triassic, end-Permian, and end-Capitanian mass extinction events. Of these, the environmental drivers of the end-Capitanian are least known. Integrating quantitative stratigraphic architecture analysis from abundant outcrop profiles, paleocurrent measurements, and petrography, this study investigates the stratigraphic interval that records the end-Capitanian extinction event in the southwestern and southern main Karoo Basin and demonstrates that this biotic change coincided with a subtle variation in the stratigraphic architectural style ∼260 Ma ago. Our multi-proxy sedimentological work not only defines the depositional setting of the succession as a megafan system that drained the foothills of the Cape Fold Belt, but also attempts to differentiate the tectonic and climatic controls on the fluvial architecture of this paleontologically important Permian succession. Our results reveal limited changes in sediment sources, paleocurrents, sandstone body geometries, and possibly a constant hot, semi-arid paleoclimate during the deposition of the studied interval; however, the stratigraphic trends show upward increase in 1) laterally accreted, sandy architectural elements and 2) architectural elements that build a portion of the floodplain deposits. We consider this to reflect a long-term retrogradational stacking pattern of facies composition that can be linked to changes on the medial parts of southward draining megafans, where channel sinuosity increased, and depositional energy decreased at the end-Capitanian. The shift in the fluvial architecture was likely triggered by basin-wide allogenic controls rather than local autogenic processes because this trend is observed in the coeval stratigraphic intervals from geographically disparate areas in the southwestern and southern main Karoo Basin. Consequently, we propose that this regional backstepping most likely resulted from tectonic events in the adjacent Cape Fold Belt.


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. T1037-T1055
Author(s):  
Jerson J. Tellez Rodriguez ◽  
Matthew J. Pranter ◽  
Rex Cole

The Lower Cretaceous Burro Canyon Formation in the southwestern Piceance Basin, Colorado, is composed of deposits that represent a braided fluvial system with high net to gross that transitions stratigraphically upward into a low net-to-gross, low-sinuosity, meandering fluvial system. The fluvial deposits are composed of multiple upward-fining, conglomeratic-to-sandstone successions forming bars and bar sets that exhibit inclined heterolithic strata that we have interpreted to have formed by oblique and downstream accretion. We used well-exposed outcrops, detailed measured sections, and unmanned aerial system-based imagery to describe the fluvial architecture of the Late Cretaceous formation using a hierarchical approach. We described the Burro Canyon Formation as comprising sandstone-rich amalgamated channel complexes (ACC) overlain by non- to semiamalgamated channel complexes. The lower interval of the formation is composed of ACC that contain channel-fill elements with cross-stratification and numerous truncated contacts. These stacked channel-fill elements exhibit an apparent width range of 137–1300 ft (40–420 m) and a thickness range of 5–60 ft (1.5–18 m). The upper interval of the Burro Canyon Formation comprises mudstone-prone intervals of the nonamalgamated channel complex with isolated channel-fill elements interbedded with floodplain mudstones that represent a period of relatively high base level. Associate channel fill elements range in apparent width from 200 to 1000 ft (60 to 300 m) and thickness from 20 to 30 ft (6 to 18 m). The characteristics and spatial distribution of architectural elements of the Burro Canyon Formation correspond to one depositional sequence. The erosional basal surface of the formation, as well as lateral changes in thickness and net to gross, suggest that the Burro Canyon Formation within this study area was deposited as an incised valley fill. Fluvial deposits of the Burro Canyon Formation serve as outcrop analogs for subsurface interpretations in similar reservoirs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document