apple pests
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

61
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2022 ◽  
pp. 101556
Author(s):  
Tiewei Wang ◽  
Longgang Zhao ◽  
Baohua Li ◽  
Juan Li ◽  
Xinwei Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Adilbay Reyimbayevich Utepbergenov ◽  

Apples are widely used by the population as a fresh and processed product at any time of the year. The relevance of the experiment is the protection of orchards from apple pests and the cultivation of high-quality products. Over the years of experiments, the main types of pests that are found in gardens and cause the greatest damage, as well as their morphological characteristics, have been studied. Laspeyresia (Carpocapsa) pomonella L. is recognized as the most harmful apple tree in our region.


PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9334
Author(s):  
László Mezőfi ◽  
Gábor Markó ◽  
Csaba Nagy ◽  
Dávid Korányi ◽  
Viktor Markó

Spiders (Araneae) form abundant and diverse assemblages in agroecosystems such as fruit orchards, and thus might have an important role as natural enemies of orchard pests. Although spiders are polyphagous and opportunistic predators in general, limited information exists on their natural prey at both species and community levels. Thus, the aim of this study was to assess the natural prey (realized trophic niche) of arboreal hunting spiders, their role in trophic webs and their biological control potential with direct observation of predation events in apple orchards. Hunting spiders with prey in their chelicerae were collected in the canopy of apple trees in organic apple orchards in Hungary during the growing seasons between 2013 and 2019 and both spiders and their prey were identified and measured. Among others, the composition of the actual (captured by spiders) and the potential (available in the canopy) prey was compared, trophic niche and food web metrics were calculated, and some morphological, dimensional data of the spider-prey pairs were analyzed. Species-specific differences in prey composition or pest control ability were also discussed. By analyzing a total of 878 prey items captured by spiders, we concluded that arboreal hunting spiders forage selectively and consume a large number of apple pests; however, spiders’ beneficial effects are greatly reduced by their high levels of intraguild predation and by a propensity to switch from pests to alternative prey. In this study, arboreal hunting spiders showed negative selectivity for pests, no selectivity for natural enemies and positive selectivity for neutral species. In the trophic web, the dominant hunting spider taxa/groups (Carrhotus xanthogramma, Philodromus cespitum, Clubiona spp., Ebrechtella tricuspidata, Xysticus spp. and ‘Other salticids’) exhibit different levels of predation on different prey groups and the trophic web’s structure changes depending on the time of year. Hunting spiders show a high functional redundancy in their predation, but contrary to their polyphagous nature, the examined spider taxa showed differences in their natural diet, exhibited a certain degree of prey specialization and selected prey by size and taxonomic identity. Guilds (such as stalkers, ambushers and foliage runners) did not consistently predict either prey composition or predation selectivity of arboreal hunting spider species. From the economic standpoint, Ph. cespitum and Clubiona spp. were found to be the most effective natural enemies of apple pests, especially of aphids. Finally, the trophic niche width of C. xanthogramma and Ph. cespitum increased during ontogeny, resulting in a shift in their predation. These results demonstrate how specific generalist predators can differ from each other in aspects of their predation ecology even within a relatively narrow taxonomic group.


Author(s):  
Maciej Zaborowicz ◽  
Piotr Boniecki ◽  
Hanna Piekarska-Boniecka ◽  
Krzysztof Przybył ◽  
Łukasz Gierz ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (1) ◽  
pp. 231-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
James T.S. Walker ◽  
David Maxwell Suckling ◽  
C. Howard Wearing

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. tsw105
Author(s):  
John C. Wise ◽  
Anthony H. VanWoerkom ◽  
Larry J. Gut
Keyword(s):  

2015 ◽  
Vol 110 ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Boniecki ◽  
K. Koszela ◽  
H. Piekarska-Boniecka ◽  
J. Weres ◽  
M. Zaborowicz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document