maximal antichain
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

9
(FIVE YEARS 0)

H-INDEX

2
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Filomat ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1919-1923 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milos Kurilic ◽  
Petar Markovic

If ?R,E? is the Rado graph andR(R) the set of its copies inside R, then ?R(R), ?? is a chain-complete and non-atomic partial order of the size 2x0 . A family A ? R(R) is a maximal antichain in this partial order iff (1) A ? B does not contain a copy of R, for each different A, B ?A and (2) For each S ? R(R) there is A ? A such that A ? S contains a copy of R. We show that the partial order ?R(R), ?? contains maximal antichains of size 2x0, X0 and n, for each positive integer n (thus, of all possible cardinalities, under CH). The results are compared with the corresponding known results concerning the partial order ?[?]?, ??.


2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 528-550
Author(s):  
VICTOR FALGAS-RAVRY

Given a graph G, let Q(G) denote the collection of all independent (edge-free) sets of vertices in G. We consider the problem of determining the size of a largest antichain in Q(G). When G is the edgeless graph, this problem is resolved by Sperner's theorem. In this paper, we focus on the case where G is the path of length n − 1, proving that the size of a maximal antichain is of the same order as the size of a largest layer of Q(G).


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim Pijls ◽  
Rob Potharst

This paper proposes a new proof of Dilworth's theorem. The proof is based upon the minflow/maxcut property in flow networks. In relation to this proof, a new method to find both a Dilworth decomposition and a maximal antichain is presented.


Order ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bill Sands
Keyword(s):  

10.37236/1914 ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwight Duffus ◽  
Bill Sands

For a subset $S$ of a finite ordered set $P$, let $$S\!\uparrow\;=\{x\in P:x\ge s \hbox{ for some }s\in S\}\quad\hbox{and} \quad S\!\downarrow\;=\{x\in P:x\le s \hbox{ for some }s\in S\}.$$ For a maximal antichain $A$ of $P$, let $$s(A)=\max_{A=U\cup D}{|U\!\uparrow|+|D\!\downarrow|\over|P|}\ ,$$ the maximum taken over all partitions $U\cup D$ of $A$, and $$s_k(P)=\min_{A\in {\cal A}(P),|A|=k}s(A)$$ where we assume $P$ contains at least one maximal antichain of $k$ elements. Finally, for a class ${\cal C}$ of finite ordered sets, we define $$s_k({\cal C})=\inf_{P\in {\cal C}}s_k(P).$$ Thus $s_k({\cal C})$ is the greatest proportion $r$ satisfying: every $k$-element maximal antichain of a member $P$ of ${\cal C}$ can be "split" into sets $U$ and $D$ so that $U\!\uparrow\cup\; D\!\downarrow$ contains at least $r|P|$ elements. In this paper we determine $s_k({\cal G}_k)$ for all $k\ge 1$, where ${\cal G}_k=\{{\bf k}\times{\bf n}:n\ge k\}$ is the family of all $k$ by $n$ "grids".


2001 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 337-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dwight Duffus ◽  
Bill Sands

AbstractA subset F of an ordered set X is a fibre of X if F intersects every maximal antichain of X. We find a lower bound on the function ƒ (D), the minimum fibre size in the distributive lattice D, in terms of the size of D. In particular, we prove that there is a constant c such that In the process we show that minimum fibre size is a monotone property for a certain class of distributive lattices. This fact depends upon being able to split every maximal antichain of this class of distributive lattices into two parts so that the lattice is the union of the upset of one part and the downset of the other.


Order ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-173 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Morvan ◽  
Lhouari Nourine
Keyword(s):  

1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (2) ◽  
pp. 534-547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiří Witzany

AbstractIf S, T are stationary subsets of a regular uncountable cardinal κ, we say that S reflects fully in T, S < T, if for almost all α ∈ T (except a nonstationary set) S ∩ α stationary in α. This relation is known to be a well-founded partial ordering. We say that a given poset P is realized by the reflection ordering if there is a maximal antichain 〈Xp: p ∈ P〉 of stationary subsets of Reg(κ) so thatWe prove that if , and P is an arbitrary well-founded poset of cardinality ≤ κ+ then there is a generic extension where P is realized by the reflection ordering on κ.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document