Effects of a National Quality Improvement Collaborative on ABCDEF Bundle Implementation

Background The ABCDEF bundle (Assess, prevent, and manage pain and Delirium; Both spontaneous awakening and breathing trials; Choice of analgesia/sedation; Early mobility; and Family engagement) improves intensive care unit outcomes, but adoption into practice is poor. Objective To assess the effect of quality improvement collaborative participation on ABCDEF bundle performance. Methods This interrupted time series analysis included 20 months of bundle performance data from 15 226 adults admitted to 68 US intensive care units. Segmented regression models were used to quantify complete and individual bundle element performance changes over time and compare performance patterns before (6 months) and after (14 months) collaborative initiation. Results Complete bundle performance rates were very low at baseline (<4%) but increased to 12% by the end. Complete bundle performance increased by 2 percentage points (SE, 0.9; P = .06) immediately after collaborative initiation. Each subsequent month was associated with an increase of 0.6 percentage points (SE, 0.2; P = .04). Performance rates increased significantly immediately after initiation for pain assessment (7.6% [SE, 2.0%], P = .002), sedation assessment (9.1% [SE, 3.7%], P = .02), and family engagement (7.8% [SE, 3%], P = .02) and then increased monthly at the same speed as the trend in the baseline period. Performance rates were lowest for spontaneous awakening/breathing trials and early mobility. Conclusions Quality improvement collaborative participation resulted in clinically meaningful, but small and variable, improvements in bundle performance. Opportunities remain to improve adoption of sedation, mechanical ventilation, and early mobility practices.

Abstract 14159: Characteristics and Outcomes in COVID-19 Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients

Introduction: Survival of adult patients with COVID-19 who had an in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) are poor. Characteristics and outcomes for pediatric IHCA patients with COVID-19 are unknown. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that pediatric COVID-19 patients would have worse survival outcomes when compared to non-COVID patients. Methods: A multicenter, multinational cohort of pediatric IHCA in the pediRES-Q collaborative were reviewed (March 1, 2020 - April 1, 2021). We characterized patients with COVID-19 compared to patients without COVID-19 and investigated whether COVID-19 was associated with survival outcomes using multivariate logistic regression with mixed effects. Results: We identified 362 pediatric IHCAs of which 14 were COVID-19 positive. For non-COVID-19 vs COVID-19 patients respectively, median [Q1; Q3] age was 1.0 [0.3; 7.1] vs. 7.1 [1.5; 14.0] years and 42% vs. 43% were female. Immediate cause of arrest was hypotension: 8% vs. 43%, respiratory decompensation: 19% vs. 21%, and hypoxia 22% vs. 36% for non-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19 patients. For non-COVID-19 vs COVID-19 patients, total CPR duration was 10 [4; 33] min vs 19 [5; 33] min (for non-return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) cases only: 35 [20; 55] min vs 34 [24; 34] min). For non-COVID-19 vs COVID-19 patients, ROSC was 79% vs. 57%, aOR: 0.48 (95% CI: 0.24-0.98), survival to hospital discharge was 45% vs. 29%, aOR: 0.63 (95% CI: 0.25-1.57) and survival with favorable neurological outcome was 39% vs. 21%, aOR: 0.51 (95% CI: 0.16-1.65). Conclusions: In a pediatric resuscitation quality improvement collaborative, pediatric IHCA patients with COVID-19 were older when compared to non-COVID-19 patients. Median CPR duration was >30 minutes for COVID-19 non-survivors, COVID-19 patients had lower chance of ROSC when compared to non-COVID-19 patients but considerably better survival outcomes than those reported for adults.

Length of Stay per Total Body Surface Area Burn Relative to Mechanism: A Pediatric Injury Quality Improvement Collaborative (PIQIC) Study

Studies on length of stay (LOS) per total body surface area (TBSA) burn in pediatric patients are often limited to single institutions and are grouped in ranges of TBSA burn which lacks specific detail to counsel patients and families. A LOS to TBSA burn ratio of 1 has been widely accepted but not validated with multi-institution data. The objective of this study is to describe the current relationship of LOS per TBSA burn and LOS per TBSA burn relative to burn mechanism with the use of multi-institutional data. Data from the Pediatric Injury Quality Improvement Collaborative (PIQIC) were obtained for patients across five pediatric burn centers from July 2018-September 2020. LOS per TBSA burn ratios were calculated. Descriptive statistics and generalized linear regression which modeled characteristics associated with LOS per TBSA ratio are described. Among the 1267 pediatric burn patients, the most common mechanism was scald (64%), followed by contact (17%) and flame (13%). The average LOS/TBSA burn ratio across all cases was 1.2 (SD 2.1). In adjusted models, scald burns and chemical burns had similar LOS/TBSA burn ratios of 0.8 and 0.9, respectively, while all other burns had a significantly higher LOS/TBSA burn ratio (p<0.0001). LOS/TBSA burn ratios were similar across races, although Hispanics had a slightly higher ratio at 1.4 days. These data establish a multi-institution LOS per TBSA ratio across PIQIC centers and demonstrate significant variation in the LOS per TBSA burn relative to the burn mechanism sustained.