A Clinical Study on the Treatment of Multiple Radial Fractures with Embedded Wearable Device Holder and Absorption Bone Nail Combined with Decoction

Multiple radial fractures have brought great pain to the patients, and the treatment takes a long time and the effect is slow, which seriously affects people’s production and life. Traditional conservative treatment methods are mostly used for radius fractures. However, with the development of science and technology of the times, the level of medical treatment is also constantly improving. For radius fractures, the embedded wearable device fixation frame absorption bone nail treatment method has attracted attention. In order to study whether the embedded wearable device fixation frame can treat radius fractures, this article conducted a related survey of radius fracture patients in a hospital in a certain city, reviewed related literature, conducted interviews with professionals and so forth, and collected relevant information. A case template was constructed, and a clinical research model was created using a comprehensive quantitative and qualitative analysis method. The results of the study found that using the research embedded wearable device fixation frame to treat radius fractures with absorption bone nails can achieve good results, and its healing efficiency is about 20% faster than conservative treatment. With decoction, its treatment efficiency can be improved; and the prognostic treatment of the decoction can reduce the complications of the patient’s treatment by about 13%. This shows that the embedded wearable device holder absorption bone nail combined with decoction can play an important role in the treatment of multiple radius fractures.

Treatment and outcomes of basicervical femoral neck fractures: A systematic review

Purpose: This study aims to systematically review the literature comparing surgical treatments options and respective failure rates for basicervical hip fractures. Methods: A comprehensive search of databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central for studies published in English on or before June 21, 2019 was performed. Selected search terms included “basicervical,” “basi cervical,” “AO/OTA type 31-B,” “femoral neck fracture” AND “bone nails,” “bone screws,” “fracture fixation,” “internal fixation,” “arthroplasty,” “cephalomedullary,” “sliding hip screw,” “ORIF,” and “treatment outcome.” We included studies that assessed outcomes of basicervical fracture fixation using open reduction internal fixation or arthroplasty. Two authors extracted the following data from each paper: study design, country, cohort year, definition of basicervical, intervention type, sample size, patient demographics, follow-up length, percent of fractures that required revision, and the percent of implants that failed. Results: Sixteen articles encompassing 910 patients were included. The main outcome was the percent of implants that required revision. The total revision rates were 8% (8 studies, 157 patients, range 0%–55%) for cephalomedullary nails, 7% (10 studies, 584 patients, range 0%–18%) for sliding hip screws, 23% (3 studies, 40 patients, range 16%–50%) for cannulated screws, 0% (1 study, 6 patients) for total hip arthroplasty, and 8% (2 studies, 13 patients, range 0%–11%) for hemiarthroplasty. Conclusion: Management of basicervical fractures with SHS and CMN produces similar failure and re-operation rates. Limited evidence is available on the use of cannulated screws and arthroplasty, but available studies suggest that cannulated screws have an unacceptable revision rate (23%) while arthroplasty may be acceptable. Future studies examining the comparative efficacy of various fixation methods would benefit from strict definition of fracture type as well as consistent reporting of functional outcomes, re-operation rates, and mortality.

Improvements of Stiffness and Strength of Bio-Resorbable Bone Nails by the MFC-Concept

In contrast to the classical composites, microfibrillar reinforced composites are not prepared via melt blending of the matrix and the reinforcing material. In fact, the reinforcing elements of this composite, the microfibrils, are created during processing. This advantage allows the manufacturing of a full biodegradable composite material with improved mechanical properties. Basing on a blend of two common biodegradable polymers, polylactide and polyglycolide, this new composite shows promising values under ambient conditions.