wear prediction
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

378
(FIVE YEARS 122)

H-INDEX

30
(FIVE YEARS 4)

2022 ◽  
Vol 214 ◽  
pp. 122-137
Author(s):  
Shuren Chen ◽  
Hantao Ding ◽  
Zhong Tang ◽  
Shuaihua Hao ◽  
Yunfei Zhao

2022 ◽  
Vol 109 ◽  
pp. 103460
Author(s):  
Henri Dolfen ◽  
Jeroen De Ridder ◽  
Landon Brockmeyer ◽  
Elia Merzari ◽  
Graham Kennedy ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Satish Kumar ◽  
Tushar Kolekar ◽  
Ketan Kotecha ◽  
Shruti Patil ◽  
Arunkumar Bongale

Purpose Excessive tool wear is responsible for damage or breakage of the tool, workpiece, or machining center. Thus, it is crucial to examine tool conditions during the machining process to improve its useful functional life and the surface quality of the final product. AI-based tool wear prediction techniques have proven to be effective in estimating the Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of the cutting tool. However, the model prediction needs improvement in terms of accuracy.Design/methodology/approachThis paper represents a methodology of fusing a feature selection technique along with state-of-the-art deep learning models. The authors have used NASA milling data sets along with vibration signals for tool wear prediction and performance analysis in 15 different fault scenarios. Multiple steps are used for the feature selection and ranking. Different Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) approaches are used to improve the overall prediction accuracy of the model for tool wear prediction. LSTM models' performance is evaluated using R-square, Mean Absolute Error (MAE), Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) parameters.FindingsThe R-square accuracy of the hybrid model is consistently high and has low MAE, MAPE and RMSE values. The average R-square score values for LSTM, Bidirection, Encoder–Decoder and Hybrid LSTM are 80.43, 84.74, 94.20 and 97.85%, respectively, and corresponding average MAPE values are 23.46, 22.200, 9.5739 and 6.2124%. The hybrid model shows high accuracy as compared to the remaining LSTM models.Originality/value The low variance, Spearman Correlation Coefficient and Random Forest Regression methods are used to select the most significant feature vectors for training the miscellaneous LSTM model versions and highlight the best approach. The selected features pass to different LSTM models like Bidirectional, Encoder–Decoder and Hybrid LSTM for tool wear prediction. The Hybrid LSTM approach shows a significant improvement in tool wear prediction.


2022 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 17-27
Author(s):  
Yilin Li ◽  
Jinjiang Wang ◽  
Zuguang Huang ◽  
Robert X. Gao

2022 ◽  
Vol 162 ◽  
pp. 108070
Author(s):  
Meiqi Wang ◽  
Sixian Jia ◽  
Enli Chen ◽  
Shaopu Yang ◽  
Pengfei Liu ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
pp. 100092
Author(s):  
Hans J. Ottosson ◽  
Christopher A. Mattson ◽  
Oliver K. Johnson ◽  
Immy Irot

2022 ◽  
Vol 62 ◽  
pp. 441-449
Author(s):  
Dongdong Wang ◽  
Qingyang Liu ◽  
Dazhong Wu ◽  
Liqiang Wang

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document