honey bee nutrition
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

10
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

5
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 505-519
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Tsuruda ◽  
Priyadarshini Chakrabarti ◽  
Ramesh R. Sagili

Antibiotics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 811
Author(s):  
Nikos Asoutis Didaras ◽  
Katerina Karatasou ◽  
Tilemachos G Dimitriou ◽  
Grigoris D. Amoutzias ◽  
Dimitris Mossialos

Bee-collected pollen (BCP) is a well-known functional food. Honey bees process the collected pollen and store it in the hive, inside the comb cells. The processed pollen is called bee- bread or ambrosia and it is the main source of proteins, lipids, vitamins, macro-and micro-elements in honey bee nutrition. During storage, beebread undergoes solid state fermentation which preserves it and increases the bioavailability of nutrients. Research on beebread has been rather limited until now. In recent years, there is an increasing interest regarding the antimicrobial properties of BCP and beebread, due to emerging antimicrobial resistance by pathogens. Both BCP and beebread exhibit antimicrobial properties against diverse pathogens, like bacteria and fungi. As is the case with other bee products, lack of antimicrobial resistance might be attributed to the synergy of more than one antimicrobial compounds within BCP and beebread. Furthermore, BCP and bee bread exert targeted activity against pathogens and affect the host microbiome in a prebiotic manner. This review aims to present up to date research findings regarding these aspects as well as to discuss current challenges and future perspectives in the field.


Insects ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 405
Author(s):  
Harper McMinn-Sauder ◽  
Rodney Richardson ◽  
Tyler Eaton ◽  
Mike Smith ◽  
Reed Johnson

A present goal of the Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) is to manage land in agricultural landscapes to increase pollinator abundance and diversity. CP42, or the pollinator seed mix, is planted and managed to support foraging pollinators with blooming flowers present at all points in the foraging season. This high-quality habitat provides an excellent opportunity to study honey bee nutrition and determine whether honey bees located near CRP sites use known resources included in planting seed mixes. This study aims to highlight the primary sources of honey bee forage in the northern Midwest as well as to assess honey bee utilization of the floral resources provided by the pollinator seed mix used for CRP plantings. We received pollen samples collected using pollen traps by beekeepers in Ohio, South Dakota, Indiana, Illinois, and Michigan. Metabarcoding methods were used to identify and quantify pollen collected at different points in the season. The results indicate that honey bees frequently used major mass flowering resources such as Glycine, Trifolium, and Symphiotrichum throughout the season. In addition, flowers included in the CRP pollinator seed mix were used modestly. These results have implications for pollinator seed mix design.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan E. Leach ◽  
Frank Drummond

Declines in wild and managed bee species richness and abundances have been observed throughout Europe and North America in recent decades. These declines have led to questions regarding pollination of wild and cultivated plants. In response to these concerns, efforts towards the conservation of pollinators have been initiated. Part of this conservation effort should be to provide the basic nutritional needs for bees. Nutrition plays one of the most important roles in bee growth, development, and reproduction. There is a large body of information regarding honey bee nutrition, whereas we lack nutritional information on native wild bees. Our knowledge of bumble bee nutritional needs has increased since the introduction of commercial rearing and sale of certain bumble bee species; however, there is still a lack of basic nutritional guidelines such as minimum dietary needs of proteins, amino acids, lipids, and sterols. The large difference in physiology and life history between honey bees and North American wild bees suggests that their nutritional requirements could be quite different.


2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison M Reeves ◽  
Scott T O’Neal ◽  
Richard D Fell ◽  
Carlyle C Brewster ◽  
Troy D Anderson

2015 ◽  
Vol 108 (6) ◽  
pp. 2518-2528 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria Degrandi-Hoffman ◽  
Yanping Chen ◽  
Emily Watkins Dejong ◽  
Mona L. Chambers ◽  
Geoffrey Hidalgo

Bee World ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. 50-53
Author(s):  
Carmine Joseph DeStefano

2006 ◽  
Vol 46 (1) ◽  
pp. 141 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. C. Somerville ◽  
H. I. Nicol

Pollen pellets collected from honey bees foraging at 62 floral species were analysed for protein and amino acid content and their value for honey bee nutrition was determined. The crude protein levels of all pollen pellets analysed ranged from 9.2% for Hypochoeris radicata (flatweed) to 37.4% for Echium plantagineum (Paterson’s curse) with a mean of 25.9%. Pollen pellets from 15 species were identified as providing protein levels below those acknowledged to satisfy honey bee dietary requirements when they are the only source of pollen available to the honey bee colony. Pollens collected from species of the same genus demonstrated similar protein profiles. Isoleucine was deficient in 38% of the pollens with 69% of eucalypts and related species demonstrating a significant isoleucine deficiency.


1970 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 143-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mykola H. Haydak

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document