subsurface drains
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

95
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (17) ◽  
pp. 9594
Author(s):  
Guannan Ding ◽  
Karen Mancl ◽  
Jiyoung Lee ◽  
Olli H. Tuovinen

Processes to remove and inactivate Escherichia coli from wastewater effluents and drainage are complex and interrelated. The objective of this study was to determine if irrigation of undisinfected wastewater effluents in the winter moves bacteria to surface water through subsurface drainage, posing a public health risk. The central Ohio study site, an open meadow constructed in the 1970s, is irrigated with lagoon effluents each summer. The irrigated area has subsurface drainage that collects for discharge in one spot. Undisinfected wastewater from a stabilization pond was irrigated for the first time in the winter of 2013/2014. E. coli was measured in the subsurface discharge during the irrigated winter season and compared to the non-irrigated previous winter season. Soil temperature and moisture were also monitored. E. coli moved to subsurface drains when the water table was above the drain. E. coli also moved to subsurface drains when the shallow soil temperature dropped to near freezing. With less winter sunlight and minimal evapotranspiration, the soil stayed moist near field capacity. Temperature appears to be the most important factor in limiting natural inactivation in subsurface soil and allowing the movement of E. coli in undisinfected wastewater effluents to the subsurface drainage systems. The results show that winter reuse of undisinfected wastewater does pose a public health risk to surface water through subsurface drainage. Therefore, disinfection of wastewater effluents used for irrigation is strongly recommended.


2021 ◽  
Vol 64 (6) ◽  
pp. 1849-1866
Author(s):  
Manal H. Askar ◽  
Mohamed A. Youssef ◽  
Dean L. Hesterberg ◽  
Kevin W. King ◽  
Aziz Amoozegar ◽  
...  

HighlightsDRAINMOD-P was tested using a dataset from a drained field with desiccation cracks.Surface and subsurface phosphorus losses were mainly in the particulate form.Surface runoff was a major pathway for phosphorus loss in this field.The model performance in predicting edge-of-field phosphorus loss is promising.Abstract. The recently developed phosphorus (P) model DRAINMOD-P was tested using a four-year dataset from a subsurface-drained field in northwest Ohio with significant potential for desiccation cracking or preferential flow. The model satisfactorily predicted subsurface drainage discharge, with a monthly Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) of 0.59 and index of agreement (IOA) of 0.89. Lack of annual water budget closure was reported and was likely caused by uncertainty in measured surface runoff and/or modeling approaches representing macropore flow. More than 80% of predicted surface and subsurface P losses were in the particulate form. Surface runoff was the major pathway for P loss, contributing 78% of predicted total P (TP) load. On average, predicted macropore flow represented about 15% of drainage discharge and contributed 21% of DRP loss via subsurface drains. The performance of DRAINMOD-P in predicting monthly dissolved reactive P and TP losses through subsurface drains can be rated as poor (NSE = 0.33 and IOA = 0.60) and very good (NSE = 0.81 and IOA = 0.95), respectively. DRAINMOD-P demonstrated potential for simulating P fate and transport in drained cropland. More testing is needed to further examine newly incorporated hydrological and biogeochemical components of the model. Keywords: Agricultural drainage, Edge-of-field phosphorus load, Macropore flow, Phosphorus model, Sediment yield, Water quality modeling.


2020 ◽  
Vol 192 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard H. Coupe ◽  
Jonathon D. Thornburg ◽  
Erik A. Smith ◽  
Paul D. Capel

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 634 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lipe Renato Dantas Mendes

Agriculture is often responsible for the eutrophication of surface waters due to the loss of phosphorus—a normally limiting nutrient in freshwater ecosystems. Tile-drained agricultural catchments tend to increase this problem by accelerating the transport of phosphorus through subsurface drains both in dissolved (reactive and organic phosphorus) and particulate (particle-bound phosphorus) forms. The reduction of excess phosphorus loads from agricultural catchments prior to reaching downstream surface waters is therefore necessary. Edge-of-field technologies have been investigated, developed and implemented in areas with excess phosphorus losses to receive and treat the drainage discharge, when measures at the farm-scale are not able to sufficiently reduce the loads. The implementation of these technologies shall base on the phosphorus dynamics of specific catchments (e.g., phosphorus load and dominant phosphorus form) in order to ensure that local retention goals are met. Widely accepted technologies include constructed wetlands, restored wetlands, vegetated buffer strips and filter materials. These have demonstrated a large variability in the retention of phosphorus, and results from the literature can help targeting specific catchment conditions with suitable technologies. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the currently used edge-of-field technologies for phosphorus retention in tile-drained catchments, with great focus on performance, application and limitations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 650 ◽  
pp. 2830-2841 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily E. Woodward ◽  
Dana W. Kolpin ◽  
Wei Zheng ◽  
Nancy L. Holm ◽  
Shannon M. Meppelink ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 142 ◽  
pp. 196-207 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samaneh Saadat ◽  
Laura Bowling ◽  
Jane Frankenberger ◽  
Eileen Kladivko

2017 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 275-289
Author(s):  
Benjamin D. Haugen

Abstract Infiltration of surface water increases pore water pressures in slopes and reduces their stability. Common landslide features such as tension cracks and sag ponds can act as preferential pathways for surface drainage and may increase infiltration and exacerbate pore pressure–induced instability. Surface water drainage control is likewise recommended by numerous authors as an effective and inexpensive landslide mitigation method and has been shown to reduce the risk of landslides. While robust design procedures for other geotechnical applications exist (e.g., slope reduction, subsurface drains), similar procedures for landslide surface water drainage control have remained largely ad hoc and vary among practitioners. The objective of this article is to summarize technical literature related to surface water drainage control and provide a coherent design procedure for landslides.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document