photoreceptor membrane
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

119
(FIVE YEARS 4)

H-INDEX

31
(FIVE YEARS 1)

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. e0248354
Author(s):  
Tiffanie M. Dahl ◽  
Michelle Reed ◽  
Cecilia D. Gerstner ◽  
Guoxin Ying ◽  
Wolfgang Baehr

Cytoplasmic dynein (dynein 1), a major retrograde motor of eukaryotic cells, is a 1.4 MDa protein complex consisting of a pair of heavy chains (DYNC1H1) and a set of heterodimeric noncatalytic accessory components termed intermediate, light intermediate and light chains. DYNC1H1 (4644 amino acids) is the dynein backbone encoded by a gene consisting of 77 exons. We generated a floxed Dync1h1 allele that excises exons 24 and 25 and truncates DYNC1H1 during Six3Cre-induced homologous recombination. Truncation results in loss of the motor and microtubule-binding domain. Dync1h1F/F;Six3Cre photoreceptors degenerated rapidly within two postnatal weeks. In the postnatal day 6 (P6) Dync1h1F/F;Six3Cre central retina, outer and inner nuclear layers were severely disorganized and lacked a recognizable outer plexiform layer (OPL). Although the gene was effectively silenced by P6, DYNC1H1 remnants persisted and aggregated together with rhodopsin, PDE6 and centrin-2-positive centrosomes in the outer nuclear layer. As photoreceptor degeneration is delayed in the Dync1h1F/F;Six3Cre retina periphery, retinal lamination and outer segment elongation are in part preserved. DYNC1H1 strongly persisted in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) beyond P16 suggesting lack of clearance of the DYNC1H1 polypeptide. This persistence of DYNC1H1 allows horizontal, rod bipolar, amacrine and ganglion cells to survive past P12. The results show that cytoplasmic dynein is essential for retina lamination, nuclear positioning, vesicular trafficking of photoreceptor membrane proteins and inner/outer segment elaboration.


2020 ◽  
Vol 206 (6) ◽  
pp. 871-889
Author(s):  
Tatiana Feldman ◽  
Marina Yakovleva ◽  
Martta Viljanen ◽  
Magnus Lindström ◽  
Kristian Donner ◽  
...  

Abstract We have studied dark-adaptation at three levels in the eyes of the crustacean Mysis relicta over 2–3 weeks after exposing initially dark-adapted animals to strong white light: regeneration of 11-cis retinal through the retinoid cycle (by HPLC), restoration of native rhodopsin in photoreceptor membranes (by MSP), and recovery of eye photosensitivity (by ERG). We compare two model populations (“Sea”, Sp, and “Lake”, Lp) inhabiting, respectively, a low light and an extremely dark environment. 11-cis retinal reached 60–70% of the pre-exposure levels after 2 weeks in darkness in both populations. The only significant Lp/Sp difference in the retinoid cycle was that Lp had much higher levels of retinol, both basal and light-released. In Sp, rhodopsin restoration and eye photoresponse recovery parallelled 11-cis retinal regeneration. In Lp, however, even after 3 weeks only ca. 25% of the rhabdoms studied had incorporated new rhodopsin, and eye photosensitivity showed only incipient recovery from severe depression. The absorbance spectra of the majority of the Lp rhabdoms stayed constant around 490–500 nm, consistent with metarhodopsin II dominance. We conclude that sensitivity recovery of Sp eyes was rate-limited by the regeneration of 11-cis retinal, whilst that of Lp eyes was limited by inertia in photoreceptor membrane turnover.


2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (34) ◽  
pp. 20615-20624
Author(s):  
Mashal Kakakhel ◽  
Lars Tebbe ◽  
Mustafa S. Makia ◽  
Shannon M. Conley ◽  
David M. Sherry ◽  
...  

Trafficking of photoreceptor membrane proteins from their site of synthesis in the inner segment (IS) to the outer segment (OS) is critical for photoreceptor function and vision. Here we evaluate the role of syntaxin 3 (STX3), in trafficking of OS membrane proteins such as peripherin 2 (PRPH2) and rhodopsin. Photoreceptor-specificStx3knockouts [Stx3f/f(iCre75)andStx3f/f(CRX-Cre)] exhibited rapid, early-onset photoreceptor degeneration and functional decline characterized by structural defects in IS, OS, and synaptic terminals. Critically, in the absence of STX3, OS proteins such as PRPH2, the PRPH2 binding partner, rod outer segment membrane protein 1 (ROM1), and rhodopsin were mislocalized along the microtubules to the IS, cell body, and synaptic region. We find that the PRPH2 C-terminal domain interacts with STX3 as well as other photoreceptor SNAREs, and our findings indicate that STX3 is an essential part of the trafficking pathway for both disc (rhodopsin) and rim (PRPH2/ROM1) components of the OS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 1861 (10) ◽  
pp. 183000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana B. Feldman ◽  
Oleksandr I. Ivankov ◽  
Alexander I. Kuklin ◽  
Tatiana N. Murugova ◽  
Marina A. Yakovleva ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 53 (supplement1-2) ◽  
pp. S199
Author(s):  
Yoshiteru Makino ◽  
Yuya Tomonaga ◽  
Yusuke Shibafuji ◽  
Tetsurou Hidaka ◽  
Izuru Kawamura ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 21-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
TIMOTHY H. GOLDSMITH

AbstractEyes have evolved many times, and arthropods and vertebrates share transcription factors for early development. Moreover, the photochemistry of vision in all eyes employs an opsin and the isomerization of a retinoid from the 11-cis to the all-trans configuration. The opsins, however, have associated with several different G proteins, initiating hyperpolarizing and depolarizing conductance changes at the photoreceptor membrane. Beyond these obvious instances of homology, much of the evolutionary story is one of tinkering, producing a great variety of morphological forms and variation within functional themes. This outcome poses a central issue in the convergence of evolutionary and developmental biology: what are the heritable features in the later stages of development that give natural selection traction in altering phenotypic outcomes? This paper discusses some results of evolutionary tinkering where this question arises and, in some cases, where the reasons for particular outcomes and the role of adaptation may not be understood. Phenotypic features include: the exploitation of microvilli in rhabdomeric photoreceptors for detecting the plane of polarized light; different instances of retinoid in the visual pigment; examples of the many uses of accessory pigments in tuning the spectral sensitivity of photoreceptors; selection of opsins in tuning sensitivity in aquatic environments; employing either reflection or refraction in the optics of compound eyes; the multiple ways of constructing images in compound eyes; and the various ways of regenerating 11-cis retinals to maintain visual sensitivity. Evolution is an irreversible process, but tinkering may recover some lost functions, albeit by new mutational routes. There is both elegance and intellectual coherence to the natural processes that produce such variety and functional complexity. But marginalizing the teaching of evolution in public education is a continuing social and political problem that contributes to the reckless capacity of humans to alter the planet without trying to understand how nature works.


2009 ◽  
Vol 364 (1531) ◽  
pp. 2833-2847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dan-Eric Nilsson

The morphology and molecular mechanisms of animal photoreceptor cells and eyes reveal a complex pattern of duplications and co-option of genetic modules, leading to a number of different light-sensitive systems that share many components, in which clear-cut homologies are rare. On the basis of molecular and morphological findings, I discuss the functional requirements for vision and how these have constrained the evolution of eyes. The fact that natural selection on eyes acts through the consequences of visually guided behaviour leads to a concept of task-punctuated evolution, where sensory systems evolve by a sequential acquisition of sensory tasks. I identify four key innovations that, one after the other, paved the way for the evolution of efficient eyes. These innovations are (i) efficient photopigments, (ii) directionality through screening pigment, (iii) photoreceptor membrane folding, and (iv) focusing optics. A corresponding evolutionary sequence is suggested, starting at non-directional monitoring of ambient luminance and leading to comparisons of luminances within a scene, first by a scanning mode and later by parallel spatial channels in imaging eyes.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document