Case Report: Multicentric Reticulohistiocytosis Associated With Posterior Mediastinal Adenosquamous Carcinoma, Antinuclear Antibody Positivity and Lupus Anticoagulant Positivity

Multicentric reticulohistiocytosis (MRH) is a rare systemic disease of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis. A number of studies in the literature have documented that it can coexist with malignancy or autoimmune disease, making it difficult to determine the most appropriate therapy. Here, we present a case study of MRH associated with posterior mediastinal adenosquamous carcinoma along with antinuclear antibody positivity and lupus anticoagulant positivity. The patient experienced 6 months of clinical benefit after surgical resection and chemoradiotherapy of the mediastinal malignancy. This case adds to the available literature on multicentric reticulohistiocytosis associated with different types of malignancy and provides supplementary clinical data on the coexistence of this syndrome with malignancy and immune system abnormalities. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case study describing MRH accompanied by posterior mediastinal adenosquamous carcinoma and lupus anticoagulant positivity. The unknown aetiology and polymorphic clinical presentation of MRH warrants further investigation.

COVID-19 and Catastrophic Antiphospholipid Syndrome

One year after the beginning of the epidemic, mortality continues to be high despite several different protocols being tried. Critical patients with Covid 19 in some degree of organ failure and thrombotic events meet the diagnostic criteria of a complete or incomplete catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) or at least we may need to consider a partial form of it. The findings of autopsies and the involvement of different organs and systems are similar to those of CAPS. Currently the only therapy that has been shown to reduce mortality include steroids, anticoagulation and an antinuclear antibody. The same therapy has been shown to be effective for CAPS.

Role of solid phase immunoassay as a screening test for antinuclear antibody – A comparative analysis on Indian population

Detection of Antinuclear antibody (ANA) is the hallmark of laboratory investigations in Connective Tissue Disorders (CTD). However, various methodologies used in both screening tests and specific antibody detection has led to a loss of consensus and poor reproducibility of results. The objective of this study is to compare Solid Phase Immunoassay (SPI) with Indirect Immunofluorescence (IFA) as a screening test in correlation with the clinical profile as well as subsequent detection of specific antibodies. The study was conducted as a pilot study with a sample size of 60 cases, recruited by Rheumatologists, between April 2019 to July 2019. Each sample was screened by IFA and SPI and tested for specific antibodies by three different specific antibody tests. Although the Sensitivity of SPI (71%) was lower when compared to IFA (79%), the Specificity (78%), Positive Predictive Value (PPV) (74%) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) (76%) were all comparatively higher. In two clinically proven cases of Sjogren’s syndrome where IFA was negative and SPI was positive, specific antibody tests showed positivity for SSA/Ro. Also it was seen in two clinically confirmed cases of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus IFA was positive and SPI was negative. In this pilot study SPI appeared comparable to IFA as a screening test with better specificity, PPV and NPV. The utility of SPI was especially seen in cases with antibodies against SSA/Ro where IFA may be negative. However, in a few cases of high antibody titer SPI appeared to give a false negative result.

P010 Clinico-epidemiological characteristics and outcomes of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) patients in Kenya: data from the KAPRI registry

Background Pediatric rheumatic diseases pose a significant disease burden upon children and their families (1–3). They lead to physical disability and diminished quality of life (1–3). Determination of the burden and clinical characteristics of these diseases is a critical first step to improving access to care and optimizing use of existing health systems for the well-being of these patients (4). This is in line with the goal of the Bone and Joint decade (2000–2010) aimed at increasing recognition and understanding of the impact of musculoskeletal diseases (5,6). The Kenya Pediatric Rheumatology Registry (KAPRI) offers a unique opportunity to pioneer and spearhead a systematic and organized format to inform policy and better healthcare provision. Our objective was to determine the patient characteristics, clinical features and outcomes of Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis (JIA) patients assessed at the Aga Khan University Medical College East Africa from March 2019 to December 2020. Methods Data of JIA patients on age, gender, laboratory and clinical features at diagnosis and treatment options offered were extracted from the database. A further detailed chart review was undertaken to determine the proportion of patients who achieved remission or minimally active diseases. Results Among the 207 patients enrolled thus far, 16 (7.7%) were diagnosed to have JIA. Majority of the patients were females (75%; n = 12) with a mean age of 7 years and 3 months (Range : 1 year—13 years 7 months). All patients had joint pain and swelling as the initial presenting complaints. Majority of the patients had polyarticular JIA (75%, n = 12). The other 4 patients were oligoarticular (n = 2) and systemic JIA (n = 2). Among the polyarticular JIA patients (n = 12), only 3 (25%) were rheumatoid factor (RF) positive and 1 was antinuclear antibody (ANA) positive. The oligoarticular and systemic JIA patients were all negative for antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor and cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies (anti-ccp). Seven patients (43.8%) required biological therapies; tocilizumab (n = 2: systemic JIA), adalimumab (n = 2: polyarticular JIA), etanercept (n = 2: polyarticular JIA) andtofacitnib (n = 1: polyarticular JIA). One patient with systemic JIA on tocilizumab developed herpes simplex which was successfully managed with oral acyclovir. All the other patients did not develop any infections, allergic reactions or any other untoward events as adverse outcomes following the use of biological therapies. Five patients have attained remission as illustrated in the table below. Two patients have been lost to follow up. Conclusion Seronegative polyarticular JIA was the predominant form of JIA observed with a predilection to affect more girls and boys. Over a period of 2 years, remission has been attained among 31.25% of the patients (5 of 16) with use of synthetic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and biological therapies.

Clinical effectiveness and safety of baricitinib for the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis-associated uveitis or chronic anterior antinuclear antibody-positive uveitis: study protocol for an open-label, adalimumab active-controlled phase 3 clinical trial (JUVE-BRIGHT)

Background Juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) is the most common pediatric rheumatic disease and the most common systemic disorder associated with uveitis in childhood. Uveitis is more common in JIA patients who are antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive, have an early-onset disease, and have oligoarticular arthritis. JIA-associated uveitis (JIA-uveitis) is typically anterior, chronic, bilateral, nongranulomatous, and asymptomatic. Visual outcomes in JIA-uveitis have improved with current screening and treatment options; however, many patients fail to respond or do not achieve long-lasting remission. Baricitinib, an oral selective Janus kinase (JAK)1 and 2 inhibitor, may impact key cytokines implicated in the pathogenesis of JIA-uveitis or ANA-positive uveitis, representing a potential novel treatment option for disease management. Methods The multicenter, phase 3 trial will be conducted using an open-label Bayesian design. The study will enroll at least 20 and up to 40 patients aged 2 to <18 years with active JIA-uveitis or chronic ANA-positive uveitis without systemic features. At least 20 patients who have had an inadequate response or intolerance to methotrexate (MTX-IR), but not biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), will be randomized (1:1) to open-label baricitinib or adalimumab. Approximately 20 additional patients who are MTX-IR or bDMARD inadequate responders will receive baricitinib treatment. Patients will be treated with once daily oral baricitinib at a fixed dose by age group (4 mg for patients aged ≥6 to <18 years and 2 mg for patients <6 years) or adalimumab (20 mg for patients weighing <30 kg and 40 mg for patients ≥30 kg) as a subcutaneous injection every 2 weeks. Treatment with stable background conventional synthetic DMARDs, low-dose corticosteroids, and/or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs is allowed. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with response at week 24. Patients may continue treatment for up to 5 years. Discussion This is the first pediatric clinical trial to assess the clinical effectiveness and safety of a JAK inhibitor in JIA-uveitis or chronic ANA-positive uveitis. A novel Bayesian design is used to assess the efficacy of baricitinib, including an adalimumab reference arm, in this small patient population with unmet medical need. Trial registration EudraCT 2019-000119-10. Registered on January 4, 2019; NCT04088409. Registered on September 12, 2019