Auswirkungen auf den vorderen Augenabschnitt beim Andocken eines Femtosekundenlasers an das Patienteninterface

Purpose. To compare the intraoperative OCT (optical coherence tomographer) of the femtosecond laser LenSx (Alcon Pharma GmbH, Freiburg) with a Scheimpflug-tomographer and an anterior segment OCT and thus to investigate a possible influence on the anterior segment of the eye when docking the patient’s interface. Material and Methods. A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 57 subjects who underwent a planned femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange. The eye to be operated on was measured prior to the operation in mydriasis with the Visante OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena) and the Pentacam AXL (Oculus Optikgeräte GmbH, Wetzlar). During the surgery, images of the anterior segment of the eye were taken by the integrated intraoperative OCT of the laser, which were evaluated afterwards and compared to the values of the other devices. The parameters examined were the internal anterior chamber depth (ACD), nasal and temporal chamber angles, central corneal thickness (CCT) and central lens thickness (LT). Results. The comparison of the intraoperative OCT and the two other devices showed clinically relevant differences in all parameters. The intraoperative OCT showed a 9.19 ± 27.55 μm larger CCT, 0.96 mm (median difference) larger LT, 0.05 mm smaller ACD than the Pentacam AXL and a 21.36 ± 25.50 μm larger CCT, 0.10 mm (median difference) smaller ACD than the Visante OCT. Conclusion. The comparison of the intraoperative OCT with the Visante OCT and the Pentacam AXL shows clinically relevant differences. Changes in the anterior segment of the eye may be due to errors in measurement or docking of the patient’s interface. Keywords. femtosecond laser, OCT, anterior segment of the eye, cataract surgery, refractive lens exchange

Multifocal IOL Explantation in Patients with Opaque Lentis after Refractive Lens Exchange

Purpose We describe the outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) explantation in a cluster of opaque multifocal Lentis LS-313 following refractive lens exchange (RLE). Methods Single-centre, single-surgeon, retrospective case series. Results The study enrolled 10 eyes of 10 patients, 6 male and 4 female. All patients had uneventful RLE with multifocal IOL implantation. The mean patient age at the time of RLE was 53 years ± 2.52 (SD). Two eyes had YAG laser capsulotomy prior explantation. The mean interval between the initial RLE and IOL explantation was 5.4 years ± 1.4 (SD). IOL exchange was performed in all eyes in one procedure. Five eyes had in the bag hydrophobic acrylic IOL (3 multifocal and 2 monofocal) three eyes had 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOL in the ciliary sulcus and two had an anterior chamber IOL. Intraoperatively one patient had weak zonules and two patients had zonular dehiscence and required anterior vitrectomy. The mean preoperative CDVA was 0.25 ± 0.15 (SD) logMAR and at the final follow-up, improved to 0.00 ± 0.07 (SD) logMAR (p < 0.01). Light microscopy with von Kossa stain confirmed IOL calcification. No postoperative complications were recorded. Conclusions IOL exchange appears to be a feasible and safe surgical option for multifocal IOL opacification. However, patients must be warned of additional intraoperative risks including zonular dialysis, vitreous loss, retinal detachment and need for potential ACIOL with its associated sequel of complications. Moreover, YAG laser capsulotomy should be considered carefully as increases the chances of intraoperative complications and restricts the surgical options of secondary IOL insertion, including in-the-bag IOL exchange with MFIOL.

Comparison of trifocal or hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes following implantation of trifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) or a hybrid multifocal-extended depth of focus (EDOF) IOL in cataract or refractive lens exchange surgeries. We examined 13 comparative studies with bilateral implantation of trifocal (898 eyes) or hybrid multifocal-EDOF (624 eyes) IOLs published through 1 March 2020. Better uncorrected and corrected near visual acuity (VA) were observed in the trifocal group (MD: − 0.143, 95% CI: − 0.192 to − 0.010, P < 0.001 and MD: − 0.149, 95% CI: − 0.217 to − 0.082, P < 0.001, respectively), while the hybrid multifocal-EDOF group presented better uncorrected intermediate VA (MD: 0.055, 95% CI: 0.016 to 0.093, P = 0.005). Trifocal IOLs were more likely to achieve spectacle independence at near distance (RR: 1.103, 95% CI: 1.036 to 1.152, P = 0.002). The halo photic effect was generated more frequently by the trifocal IOLs (RR: 1.318, 95% CI: 1.025 to 1.696, P = 0.031). Contrast sensitivity and subjective visual quality yielded comparable results between groups. Trifocal IOLs demonstrated better performance at near distance but apparently led to more photic disturbances. Our findings provided the most up-to-date and comprehensive evidence by comparing the benefits of advanced IOLs in clinical practice.

Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratektomy after a Clear Lens Exchange

Purpose: We evaluated the refractive visual outcomes and efficacy of Transepithelial Photorefractive Keratectomy (TransPRK) using Smart Pulse Technology with static and dynamic cyclotorsion and the AMARIS 1050 Hz RS laser platform from Schwind in the eyes after a refractive lens exchange. Setting/Venue: Aurelios Augenlaserzentrum, Recklinghausen. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the data of 552 consecutive eyes treated with refractive lens exchange between 2016 and 2019. A total of 47 eyes (8.5%) required a touch up after the clear lens exchange. From 43 eyes of 43 patients, we obtained a minimum follow up of 3 months. In all cases, we performed a TransPRK with a minimum optical zone of 7.2 mm, centering the ablation on the vertex of the cornea. Results: The average age of the treated eyes was 57 years old, with a range between 48 and 68 years. The mean treated sphere was 0.42 diopters (D), with a range between −1.0 and +1.75 D. The mean astigmatism was 1.06 D. Postoperatively, after laser vision correction, we reduced the sphere to a mean of 0.11 D (range −0.5 to +0.75 D), and, postoperatively, the mean astigmatism was 0.25 D (range −0.75 to 0 D). The predictability for a spheric equivalent (SEQ) of 0.5 D was 91%, and for 1 D it was 100% of the cases. No eye lost more than one Snellen line. Conclusions: TransPRK with smart pulse was predictable for correcting ametropia after Clear Lens Surgery.