dutch caribbean
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

156
(FIVE YEARS 44)

H-INDEX

12
(FIVE YEARS 1)

One Ecosystem ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seringe Huisman ◽  
Wendy Jesse ◽  
Jacintha Ellers ◽  
Pieter van Beukering

Invasive species are a worldwide threat to biodiversity, especially on Caribbean islands. Through their impact on the structure and functioning of ecosystems, they also affect ecosystem services. Therefore, invasive species can have profound socio-economic effects. On the Dutch Caribbean Island of St. Eustatius, the invasive perennial vine Coralita is present on roughly 33% of the Island. While ecological damage is evident, effective management strategies are still lacking. This study links the ecological, cultural and societal effects of the invasion to the economy of the Island by estimating the ecosystem service losses due to Coralita in monetary value. We have spatially assessed the economic value of five main ecosystem services (tourism, non-use value, carbon sequestration, archaeology and local cultural and recreational value) to the different habitats on the Island and estimated the loss of these values under three scenarios of Coralita cover: 0%, 3% and 36% dominant cover. The baseline scenario of 0% demonstrated a total ecosystem service value of $2.7 million per year, concentrated on the Quill volcano. The 3% and 36% scenario showed a yearly loss of $39,804 and $576,704, respectively, with the largest losses located on the northern and eastern slopes of the Quill. These areas should be prioritised for management and the known potential gain per area enables choice of strategy, based on cost-benefit considerations. To reduce further economic loss by Coralita, we urgently advise an immediate management strategy and ongoing research into eradication and restoration methods.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hannah Madden ◽  
Lara Mielke

We estimated occupancy, abundance (lambda), detection probability, density/ha and abundance of a regionally endemic snake in the Colubrid family on the Dutch Caribbean island of Saba in 2021, four years after hurricanes Irma and Maria impacted the island. Line transect surveys were conducted at 74 sites covering 6.7 ha. The proportion of sites occupied was estimated at 0.74 (min 0.48, max 0.90), with occupancy varying between vegetation types and across elevational gradients. Similarly, lambda was estimated at 1.61 (min 0.7, max 3.7) but varied between vegetation types and elevational gradients. Detection probability was estimated at 0.15 (min 0.10, max 0.21). Using Distance sampling, we estimated 10.9 (min 7.3, max 16.2) racers/ha, with a total population estimate of 4,917 (min 2,577, max 6,362) across the entire study region (438.6 ha.) Based on anecdotal observations from Saban residents and prior literature describing the pre-hurricane population as abundant (at least 2.0 racers/hour), we posit that the population experienced a hurricane-induced decline but may have since recovered, though not to previous levels (1.28 racers/hour). Nevertheless, our results suggest that racer densities on Saba are currently higher than those on St. Eustatius. Despite this, given the species extremely limited extant range and the presence of invasive species on both islands, prevention of local extirpation should be a high conservation priority.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Betty Sedoc-Dahlberg
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Vaitiare Mulderij-Jansen ◽  
Izzy Gerstenbluth ◽  
Ashley Duits ◽  
Adriana Tami ◽  
Ajay Bailey

Abstract Background Vector-borne diseases (VBDs) such as dengue, chikungunya, and Zika pose a significant challenge to health systems in countries they affect, especially countries with less developed healthcare systems. Therefore, countries are encouraged to work towards more resilient health systems. This qualitative study aims to examine the performance of the health system of the Dutch Caribbean island of Curaҫao regarding the prevention and control of VBDs in the last decade by using the WHO health system building blocks. Methods From November 2018 to December 2020, a multi-method qualitative study was performed in Curaçao, applying content analysis of documents (n = 50), five focus group discussions (n = 30), interviews with experts (n = 11) and 15 observation sessions. The study was designed based on the WHO framework: health system building blocks. Two cycles of inductive and deductive coding were employed, and Nvivo software was used to analyse the data. Results This study’s data highlighted the challenges (e.g. insufficient oversight, coordination, leadership skills, structure and communication) that the departments of the health system of Curaҫao faced during the last three epidemics of VBDs (2010–2020). Furthermore, low levels of collaboration between governmental and non-governmental organisations (e.g. semi-governmental and private laboratories) and insufficient capacity building to improve skills (e.g. entomological, surveillance skills) were also observed. Lastly, we observed how bottlenecks in one building block negatively influenced other building blocks (e.g. inadequate leadership/governance obstructed the workforce's performance). Conclusions This study uncovers potential organisational bottlenecks that have affected the performance of the health system of Curaҫao negatively. We recommend starting with the reinforcement of oversight of the integrated vector management programme to ensure the development, implementation and evaluation of related legislation, policies and interventions. Also, we recommend evaluating and reforming the existing administrative and organisational structure of the health system by considering the cultural style, challenges and barriers of the current health system. More efforts are needed to improve the documentation of agreements, recruitment and evaluation of the workforce's performance. Based on our findings, we conceptualised actions to strengthen the health system's building blocks to improve its performance for future outbreaks of infectious diseases. Graphical abstract


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colin King ◽  
Eva Lista-de Weever ◽  
Maria Henry ◽  
Radjin Steingrover ◽  
Chérina Fleming ◽  
...  

AbstractObjectivesControl of the pandemic has required countries to look for other forms of tests besides the gold standard real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Rapid antigen tests (RAT), though less sensitive than RT-PCR, offer the possibility of rapid, inexpensive and early detection of the most infectious COVID-19 cases. Only very few studies have assessed the performance of the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 RAT among asymptomatic people or in Latin America. This study set out to validate this test among people attending the public test street in Sint Maarten, Dutch Caribbean.MethodsPeople of all ages were recruited from the public COVID-19 test street regardless of COVID-19 symptoms. They received a nasopharyngeal swab for the Abbott Panbio COVID-19 RAT and the RT-PCR Qtower. Diagnostic accuracy of the RAT was compared to the RT-PCR among the overall study population and for subgroups with/without symptoms, with/without close contact and different Ct values.ResultsUsing a RT-PCR Ct cut-off value of <33, 119 out of 1,411 people (8.4%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2. Most were asymptomatic (59%). The overall sensitivity and specificity of the RAT was 84% (95% CI 76.2-90.1) and 99.9% (95% CI 99.6-100) respectively. The sensitivity reduced to 67.6% (95% CI: 49.5%, 82.6%) among people without symptoms, regardless of whether they were in close contact with a known COVID-19 case. Sensitivity reduced considerably with a Ct cut-off value of <35.ConclusionsThe Abbott Panbio RAT is a valid and cheaper alternative to RT-PCR when used on symptomatic individuals among the general population. However, among asymptomatic people it should not be used as a stand-alone test and negative results should be confirmed with RT-PCR.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document