The effect of a shoe lift on tensor fasciae latae length during standing with an artificial functional leg length discrepancy: An ultrasonic shear wave elastography study

BACKGROUND: Shortening of tensor fasciae latae is one factor that causes a functional leg length discrepancy. A shoe lift has been used to correct the compensatory posture resulting from the discrepancy. Despite the potential therapeutic benefit of a shoe lift, the mechanism by which it exerts its effect is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of a shoe lift on tensor fasciae latae length during standing with an artificial functional leg length discrepancy using ultrasonic shear wave elastography. METHODS: Twenty-two healthy individuals performed static standing under three conditions: drop of the pelvis and flexion of the leg resulting from fixing in the hip abduction position using a hip orthosis (functional leg length discrepancy condition); drop of the pelvis by the orthosis, but no flexion of the leg due to a shoe lift (shoe lift condition); and normal bilateral standing condition. The shear elastic modulus of tensor fasciae latae was calculated using ultrasonic shear wave elastography. RESULTS: The shear elastic modulus was significantly lower in the functional leg length discrepancy condition than in the shoe lift and normal conditions (p= 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Using a shoe lift for the functional leg length discrepancy can result in a functional hip position that elongates tensor fasciae latae.

Ultrasonic Shear Device versus Monopolar Electric Cautery in Conservative Breast Surgery Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Comparative Study

Background: Surgical devices are commonly used during breast-conservative surgery (BCS) to provide better hemostasis. Ultrasonic shear has recently gained momentum as an effective tool for intraoperative bleeding reduction. This comparative study was designed to determine the efficacy of Harmonic focus in reducing postoperative complications of BCS following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTH), in comparison to the conventional method using monopolar diathermy.Methods: We conducted a prospective, non-randomized, comparative, study on patients scheduled to undergo BCS with axillary dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant CTH. Patients were recruited consecutively throughout the study period and were divided in an equal manner to undergo either monopolar electrocautery or Harmonic focus®.Results: Patients in the Harmonic Focus group had significantly shorter operative time than the monopolar electrocautery group (101.32 ± 27.3 versus 139.3 ± 31.9 minutes, respectively; p <0.001). Besides, the blood loss was significantly lower in the Harmonic Focus group (117.14 ± 35.6 versus 187 ± 49.8mL, respectively; p <0.001). Postoperatively, patients in the Harmonic Focus group had a significantly lower volume of chest wall drain (p <0.001) and shorter rime till drain removal (p <0.001). Likewise, patients in the Harmonic Focus group had a significantly lower volume of axillary drain and shorter rime till drain removal than monopolar electrocautery (p <0.001). The incidence of postoperative complications was comparable between both groups (p =0.128). Conclusions: In conclusion, the current study confirms the superiority of Harmonic Focus, compared to monopolar electrocautery, amongst patients receiving neoadjuvant CTH before BCS.