magnitude representation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

49
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 29 (12) ◽  
pp. 2161
Author(s):  
Huomin MAO ◽  
Qin LIU ◽  
Jianxiang LV ◽  
Yi MOU

2020 ◽  
Vol 195 ◽  
pp. 104844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priya B. Kalra ◽  
John V. Binzak ◽  
Percival G. Matthews ◽  
Edward M. Hubbard

Author(s):  
Giulio Baldassi ◽  
Mauro Murgia ◽  
Valter Prpic ◽  
Sara Rigutti ◽  
Dražen Domijan ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn L. McCabe ◽  
Abbie M. Popa ◽  
Courtney Durdle ◽  
Michele Amato ◽  
Margarita H. Cabaral ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Our ability to generate mental representation of magnitude from sensory information affects how we perceive and experience the world. Reduced resolution of the mental representations formed from sensory inputs may generate impairment in the proximal and distal information processes that utilize these representations. Impairment of spatial and temporal information processing likely underpins the non-verbal cognitive impairments observed in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11DS). The present study builds on prior research by seeking to quantify the resolution of spatial and temporal representation in children with 22q11DS, sex chromosome aneuploidy (SCA), and a typically developing (TD) control group. Participants and methods Children (22q11DS = 70, SCA = 49, TD = 46) responded to visual or auditory stimuli with varying difference ratios. The participant’s task was to identify which of two sequentially presented stimuli was of larger magnitude in terms of, size, duration, or auditory frequency. Detection threshold was calculated as the minimum difference ratio between the “standard” and the “target” stimuli required to achieve 75% accuracy in detecting that the two stimuli were different. Results Children with 22q11DS required larger magnitude difference between spatial stimuli for accurate identification compared with both the SCA and TD groups (% difference from standard: 22q11DS = 14; SCA = 8; TD: 7; F  = 8.42, p < 0.001). Temporal detection threshold was also higher for the 22q11DS group to both visual (% difference from standard: 22q11DS = 14; SCA = 8; TD = 7; F  = 8.33, p < 0.001) and auditory (% difference from standard: 22q11DS = 23; SCA = 12; TD: 8; F  = 8.99, p < 0.001) stimuli compared with both the SCA and TD groups, while the SCA and TD groups displayed equivalent performance on these measures (p's > 0.05). Pitch detection threshold did not differ among the groups (p's > 0.05). Conclusions The observation of higher detection thresholds to spatial and temporal stimuli indicates further evidence for reduced resolution in both spatial and temporal magnitude representation in 22q11DS, that does not extend to frequency magnitude representation (pitch detection), and which is not explained by generalized cognitive impairment alone. These findings generate further support for the hypothesis that spatiotemporal hypergranularity of mental representations contributes to the non-verbal cognitive impairment seen in 22q11DS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
Àngels Colomé

Larger distance effects in high math-anxious individuals (HMA) performing comparison tasks have previously been interpreted as indicating less precise magnitude representation in this population. A recent study by Dietrich, Huber, Moeller, and Klein limited the effects of math anxiety to symbolic comparison, in which they found larger distance effects for HMA, despite equivalent size effects. However, the question of whether distance effects in symbolic comparison reflect the properties of the magnitude representation or decisional processes is currently under debate. This study was designed to further explore the relation between math anxiety and magnitude representation through three different tasks. HMA and low math-anxious individuals (LMA) performed a non-symbolic comparison, in which no group differences were found. Furthermore, we did not replicate previous findings in an Arabic digit comparison, in which HMA individuals showed equivalent distance effects to their LMA peers. Lastly, there were no group differences in a counting Stroop task. Altogether, an explanation of math anxiety differences in terms of less precise magnitude representation is not supported.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document