Lateral versus posterior surgical approach for the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Supracondylar humeral fracture (SHF) is the most common type of fracture in children. Moreover, lateral and posterior surgical approaches are the most frequently chosen approaches for open reduction surgery in displaced SHF when C-arm is unavailable. However, previous literature showed mixed findings regarding functional and cosmetic outcomes. Currently, no systematic review and meta-analysis has compared these two procedures. Methods: Our protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021213763). We conducted a comprehensive electronic database search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Two independent reviewers screened the title and abstract, followed by full-text reading and study selection based on eligibility criteria. The quality of the selected studies was analyzed with the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis was carried out to compare the range of motion (functional outcome) and cosmetic outcome according to Flynn’s criteria. This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA and Cochrane handbook guidelines. Results: Our initial search yielded 163 studies, from which we included five comparative studies comprising 231 children in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The lateral approach was more likely to result in excellent (OR 1.69, 95% CI [0.97-2.93]) and good (OR 1.12, 95% CI [0.61-2.04]) functional outcomes and less likely to result in fair (OR 0.84, 95% CI [0.34-2.13]) and poor (OR 0.42, 95% CI [0.1-1.73]) functional outcomes compared to the posterior approach. In terms of cosmetic results, both approaches showed mixed findings. The lateral approach was more likely to result in excellent (OR 1.11, 95% CI [0.61-2.02]) and fair (OR 1.18, 95% CI [0.49-2.80]) but less likely to result in good (OR 0.79, 95% CI [0.40-1.55]) cosmetic outcomes. However, none of these analyses were statistically significant (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Lateral and posterior surgical approaches resulted in satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes. The two approaches are comparable for treating SHF in children when evaluated with Flynn’s criteria.

Lateral versus posterior surgical approach for the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Supracondylar humeral fracture (SHF) is the most common type of fracture in children. Moreover, lateral and posterior surgical approaches are the most frequently chosen approaches for open reduction surgery in displaced SHF when C-arm is unavailable. However, previous literature showed mixed findings regarding functional and cosmetic outcomes. Currently, no systematic review and meta-analysis has compared these two procedures. Methods: Our protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021213763). We conducted a comprehensive electronic database search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Two independent reviewers screened the title and abstract, followed by full-text reading and study selection based on eligibility criteria. The quality of the selected studies was analyzed with the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis was carried out to compare the range of motion (functional outcome) and cosmetic outcome according to Flynn’s criteria. This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA and Cochrane handbook guidelines. Results: Our initial search yielded 163 studies, from which we included five comparative studies comprising 231 children in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The lateral approach was more likely to result in excellent (OR 1.69, 95% CI [0.97-2.93]) and good (OR 1.12, 95% CI [0.61-2.04]) functional outcomes and less likely to result in fair (OR 0.84, 95% CI [0.34-2.13]) and poor (OR 0.42, 95% CI [0.1-1.73]) functional outcomes compared to the posterior approach. In terms of cosmetic results, both approaches showed mixed findings. The lateral approach was more likely to result in excellent (OR 1.11, 95% CI [0.61-2.02]) and fair (OR 1.18, 95% CI [0.49-2.80]) but less likely to result in good (OR 0.79, 95% CI [0.40-1.55]) cosmetic outcomes. However, none of these analyses were statistically significant (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Lateral and posterior surgical approaches resulted in satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes. The two approaches are comparable for treating SHF in children when evaluated with Flynn’s criteria.

Bridging Myositis Ossificans After Supracondylar Humeral Fracture in a Child: A Case Report

Background: Myositis ossificans is an uncommon complication of trauma and surgery, defined as ossifying changes in a non-osseous tissue such as muscles. It happens after tissue injury, with or without fractures. When myositis ossificans occurs around a joint, it can cause ankylosis, leading to complete dysfunction of the joint. Though it has been described in most parts of the body, bridging myositis ossificans involving the elbow joint were scarcely reported.Case Presentation: We report a severe case of myositis ossificans after a supracondylar humerus fracture in a 9-year-old child. In this case a palpable painless mass appeared following the fracture and surgical trauma. Ultrasound or X-ray is of significant diagnostic value. The brachialis was completely ossified and formed a bony bridge around the elbow, causing complete ankylosis. The bone mass was surgically removed through a bilateral less-invasive approach with less surgical trauma 9 months after initial presentation. we applied bone wax to the fresh bone wounds to prevent the formation of hematocele. Indomethacin, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, was administered after the operation to suppress bone proliferation in our case. Our patient had the best possible functional status and no recurrence at 2 years' follow-up.Conclusion: Elbow myositis ossificans in children may mainly affects the brachialis. A bilateral less-invasive approach is sufficient to remove the bone mass with less surgical trauma. This case also provides a new reference for the treatment of myositis ossificans after the elbow injuries.

Prevalence and Treatment Outcome of Displaced High-Long Oblique Supracondylar Humeral Fractures in Children

Aim: The treatment protocol for supracondylar humeral fracture has mainly been based only on the severity of displacement and percutaneous pinning has been recommend as a first treatment. However, a long oblique fracture line is difficult to fix by the traditional cross pinning. The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence of high-long oblique supracondylar humeral (HLO) fracture and evaluate the surgical outcome of percutaneous pin fixation.Methods: We reviewed 690 children who had undergone an operation for the displaced supracondylar humeral fracture. HLO fracture was defined as having a fracture line starting from either cortex above the metaphyseal-diaphyseal junction and finishing at the opposite cortex around or below the olecranon fossa. Clinical and radiographic parameter outcomes were assessed.Results: There were 14 patients diagnosed with the HLO fracture (14/690) and all the patients were treated by pin fixation. The median age was 5 years 1 month (range, 2–11 years). The common mode of injury was direct contact injury to the elbow. There were 6 patients with lateral HLO fracture, and 8 patients had medial HLO type. In medial HLO type, medial pinning only was done in 3 patients due to the difficulty in lateral pin insertion. In addition, the lateral pin was not a bicortical fixation through capitellum entry in 2 patients who had it fixed by cross pinning. The final Baumann angle and lateral humero-capitellar angle were 20.5 (5–67.6) degrees and 49.3 (23.3–71.9) degrees, respectively, without statistical significance compared to the normal side. Flynn's cosmetic grade showed satisfactory results in all patients.Conclusion: The prevalence of HLO fractures was 2% in the displaced supracondylar humeral fracture. The mechanism of injury of HLO fractures may be direct contact injury. In medial HLO fractures, medial pinning is important for stability, and sometimes lateral pinning was impossible. Contrarily, lateral HLO fracture could easily be fixed by lateral-only pinning, but the correct lateral pinning is necessary because medial pinning is difficult. The HLO fracture is a difficult pattern to treat by traditional percutaneous pinning and another surgical option should be considered.

Lateral versus posterior surgical approach for the treatment of supracondylar humeral fractures in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Supracondylar humeral fracture (SHF) is the most common type of fracture in children. Moreover, lateral and posterior surgical approaches are the most frequently chosen approaches for open reduction surgery in displaced SHF when closed reduction fails. However, previous literature showed mixed findings regarding functional and cosmetic outcomes. Currently, no systematic review and meta-analysis has compared these two procedures. Methods: Our protocol was registered at PROSPERO (registration number CRD42021213763). We conducted a comprehensive electronic database search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL. Two independent reviewers screened the title and abstract, followed by full-text reading and study selection based on eligibility criteria. The quality of the selected studies was analyzed with the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analysis was carried out to compare the range of motion (functional outcome) and cosmetic outcome according to Flynn’s criteria. This systematic review was conducted based on PRISMA and Cochrane handbook guidelines. Results: Our initial search yielded 163 studies, from which we included five comparative studies comprising 231 children in the qualitative and quantitative analysis. The lateral approach was more likely to result in excellent (OR 1.69, 95% CI [0.97-2.93]) and good (OR 1.12, 95% CI [0.61-2.04]) functional outcomes and less likely to result in fair (OR 0.84, 95% CI [0.34-2.13]) and poor (OR 0.42, 95% CI [0.1-1.73]) functional outcomes compared to the posterior approach. In terms of cosmetic results, both approaches showed mixed findings. The lateral approach was more likely to result in excellent (OR 1.11, 95% CI [0.61-2.02]) and fair (OR 1.18, 95% CI [0.49-2.80]) but less likely to result in good (OR 0.79, 95% CI [0.40-1.55]) cosmetic outcomes. However, none of these analyses were statistically significant (p> 0.05). Conclusion: Lateral and posterior surgical approaches resulted in satisfactory functional and cosmetic outcomes. The two approaches are comparable for treating SHF in children when evaluated with Flynn’s criteria.

Intra-Articular Bupivacaine Injection is An Ideal Method for Postoperative Pain Control in Children with Supracondylar Humeral Fracture

Objective: Supracondylar humeral fracture is the most common fracture in children. Currently there are a large number of studies on supracondylar humeral fractures addressing the epidemiology of supracondylar fractures, injury mechanisms, treatments and complications, however there are few studies on how to control the pain in children after fractures and operation. Therefore, we retrospectively analyzed the effectiveness of an intra-articular injection of 0.25% bupivacaine on pain control after CRPP of supracondylar humeral fractures in children. To our knowledge, this is the largest study on the use of an intra-articular injection for pain control after surgery for supracondylar humeral fractures.Methods: This clinical trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of intra-articular injection of 0.25% bupivacaine as a postoperative pain control in children with supracondylar humeral fractures who underwent closed reduction and percutaneous pinning (CRPP).Subjects (n = 120) were randomized to treatment with 0.25% bupivacaine (treatment group) (n = 60) or no injection (control group) (n =71). After surgery, all patients were prescribed Ibuprofen for analgesia. The Ibuprofen doses and the times of administration were recorded. The Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R) scores were blindly recorded during postoperative day 1.Results: The results suggested that the use of intra-articular injection of 0.25% bupivacaine improved pain control and decreased the need for Ibuprofen on postoperative day 1. FPS-R scores were also significantly lower in the treatment group as compared with those of the control group. No intra-articular injection-associated complications were reported. Conclusion: Therefore, the intra-articular injection of bupivacaine significantly improves postoperative pain control following CRPP of supracondylar humeral fractures in children.

Biomechanical Comparison of External Fixation and Double Plating for Stabilization of a Canine Cadaveric Supracondylar Humeral Fracture Gap Model

Objective Successful stabilization of comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures is challenging, and biomechanical studies are scarce. This study compares double-plate (DB-PLATE) and linear external fixator with an intramedullary pin tie-in (ESF-IMP) fixation techniques in a cadaveric gap model. The hypothesis was the DB-PLATE construct would be stiffer, stronger and more resistant to repeated loading than the ESF-IMP construct in both cyclic and load-to-failure axial compression testing. Study Design A 2 cm ostectomy was performed on 10 pairs of canine cadaveric humeri proximal to the supratrochlear foramen. Stabilization was with DB-PLATE (n = 10) or ESF-IMP (n = 10). Cyclic testing was performed by applying a 200 N load at 2 Hz for 63,000 cycles. Axial compressive load to failure testing followed. Data analysed included dynamic stiffness, stiffness and yield load. Results No constructs failed during cyclic testing or lost stiffness over time. Mean dynamic stiffness over the final 100 cycles was greater for DB-PLATE compared with ESF-IMP. Mean stiffness of DB-PLATE in load-to-failure testing was not different than ESF-IMP. Yield load of DB-PLATE was higher than ESF-IMP. Conclusion Both DB-PLATE and ESF-IMP survived cyclic testing with no change in dynamic stiffness. DB-PLATE was stronger than ESF-IMP in load-to-failure testing, which may make this construct preferable when prolonged healing or poor patient compliance is anticipated. Results suggest that either method may be appropriate for fixation of comminuted supracondylar humeral fractures.