pinus albicaulis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

72
(FIVE YEARS 8)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol 135 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-67
Author(s):  
David Hamer

Seeds of Whitebark Pine (Pinus albicaulis) are a major food for Grizzly Bears (Ursus arctos) in the Yellowstone ecosystem. In Canada, Grizzly Bears are known to eat Whitebark Pine seeds, but little additional information, such as the extent of such use and habitat characteristics of feeding sites, is available. Because Grizzly Bears almost always obtain Whitebark Pine seeds by excavating cones from persistent caching sites (middens) made by Red Squirrels (Tamiasciurus hudsonicus), it is possible to infer Whitebark Pine feeding when bears are located near excavated middens in Whitebark Pine stands. During 2013–2018, I conducted a retrospective study in Banff National Park using data from 23 Grizzly Bears equipped by Parks Canada staff with global positioning system (GPS) collars. My objectives were to use GPS fixes to determine the percentage of these bears that had been located in close proximity to excavated middens containing Whitebark Pine seeds and to describe the habitat at these excavated middens. I linked 15 bears (65%) to excavated middens and, by inference, consumption of Whitebark Pine seeds. Excavated middens occurred on high-elevation (mean 2103 ± 101 [SD] m), steep (mean 26° ± 8°) slopes facing mostly (96%) north through west (0–270°). Use of Whitebark Pine seeds by at least 65% of the 23 studied Grizzly Bears suggests that conservation of Whitebark Pine in Banff National Park would concomitantly benefit the at-risk population of Grizzly Bears.


2021 ◽  
Vol 482 ◽  
pp. 118789
Author(s):  
Curtis A. Gray ◽  
Chelsea Toone ◽  
Michael J. Jenkins ◽  
Sarah E. Null ◽  
Larissa L. Yocom

Forests ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 9
Author(s):  
Cuauhtémoc Sáenz-Romero ◽  
Greg O'Neill ◽  
Sally N. Aitken ◽  
Roberto Lindig-Cisneros

Assisted migration of forest tree populations through reforestation and restoration is a climate change adaptation strategy under consideration in many jurisdictions. Matching climates in which seed sources evolved with near future climates projected for plantation sites should help reduce maladaptation and increase plantation health and productivity. For threatened tree species, assisted migration outside of the species range could help avert extinction. Here, we examine lessons, limitations, and challenges of assisted migration through the lens of three assisted migration field trials of conifers in Canada and Mexico: Pinus albicaulis Engelm., an endangered subalpine tree species in the mountains of western North America; the Picea glauca (Moench) Voss × P. engelmannii Parry ex Engelm hybrid complex, of great economic and ecological importance in western Canada, and Abies religiosa (Kunth) Schltdl. & Cham., a tree species that provides overwintering sites for the monarch butterfly. We conclude that: (a) negative impacts of climate change on productivity of Picea glauca × P. engelmannii may be mitigated by planting seed sources from locations that are 3 °C mean coldest month temperature warmer than the plantation; (b) it is possible to establish Pinus albicaulis outside of its current natural distribution at sites that have climates that are within the species’ modelled historic climatic niche, although developing disease-resistant trees through selective breeding is a higher priority in the short term; (c) Abies religiosa performs well when moved 400 m upward in elevation and local shrubs (such as Baccharis conferta Kunth) are used as nurse plants; (d) new assisted migration field trials that contain populations from a wide range of climates tested in multiple disparate climates are needed, despite the costs; and (e) where naturalization of a migrated tree species in recipient ecosystem is viewed as undesirable, the invasive potential of the tree species should be assessed prior to large scale establishment, and stands should be monitored regularly following establishment.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. e0227161
Author(s):  
Chris Ray ◽  
Regina M. Rochefort ◽  
Jason I. Ransom ◽  
Jonathan C. B. Nesmith ◽  
Sylvia A. Haultain ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 457 ◽  
pp. 117736
Author(s):  
Nickolas E. Kichas ◽  
Sharon M. Hood ◽  
Gregory T. Pederson ◽  
Richard G. Everett ◽  
David B. McWethy

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Hendricks

On 17 September 2017, I observed two Clark’s Nutcrackers (Nucifraga columbiana) from 8–10 m distance as they cached seeds in a stand of dead Whitebark Pines (Pinus albicaulis) at 2500 m elevation on Saint Mary Peak in the Bitterroot Mountains of Ravalli County, Montana. Over 5 minutes, the nutcrackers created 14 caches in seven different multi-trunk tree clusters in an area of about 50 m2. All caches appeared to be single Whitebark Pine seeds, positioned 2–5 m (mostly 3–4 m) above ground in dead trees. Of the 14 caches, three were placed under loose pieces of bark on a trunk (one) or large limb (two), and the remaining 11 were in encrustations of American Wolf Lichen (Letharia columbiana) growing on branches of the dead trees. Nutcrackers are known to sometimes cache seeds above ground in trees during the late summer and autumn harvest of pine seeds, but usually not to the exclusion of other microsites. The ground at the Montana site was covered by 7–9 cm of fresh snow that fell the previous day, which may have encouraged the nutcrackers to place all of their seed caches above ground in trees.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (10) ◽  
pp. e0205423 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marian V. Lea ◽  
John Syring ◽  
Tara Jennings ◽  
Richard Cronn ◽  
Leo P. Bruederle ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-61
Author(s):  
Helen T Naughton ◽  
Kendall A Houghton ◽  
Eric D Raile ◽  
Elizabeth A Shanahan ◽  
Michael P Wallner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document