Phase-locked transcranial electrical brain stimulation for tremor suppression in dystonic tremor syndromes

Background: Tremor is a common and burdensome symptom in patients with dystonia, which is clinically heterogeneous and often resistant to treatment. The pathophysiology is suggested to involve abnormal activity in the cerebellum and motor cortex, but the causal role of these brain regions remains to be established. Transcranial alternating current stimulaton (TACS) can suppress rhytmic cerebral activity in other tremor disorders when phase-locked to the ongoing arm tremor, but the effect on dystonic tremor syndromes is unknown. Objective/Hypothesis: We aimed to establish the causal role of the cerebellum and motor cortex in dystonic tremor syndromes, and explore the therapeutic efficacy of phase-locked TACS. Methods: We applied phase-locked TACS over the ipsilateral cerebellum (N=14) and contralateral motor cortex (N=17) in dystonic tremor syndrome patients, while patients assumed a tremor-evoking posture. We measured tremor power using accelerometery during 30s stimulation periods at 10 different phase-lags (36-degrees increments) between tremor and TACS for each target. Post-hoc, TACS-effects were related to a key clinical feature: the jerkiness (regularity) of tremor. Results: Cerebellar TACS modulated tremor amplitude in a phase-dependent manner, such that tremor amplitude was suppressed or enhanced at opposite sides of the phase-cycle. This effect was specific for patients with non-jerky (sinusoidal) tremor (n=10), but absent in patients with jerky (irregular) tremor (n=4). Phase-locked stimulation over the motor cortex did not modulate tremor amplitude. Conclusions: This study indicates that the cerebellum plays a causal role in the generation of (non-jerky) dystonic tremor syndrome. Our findings suggest pathophysiologic heterogeneity between patients with dystonic tremor syndrome, which mirrors clinical variability.

Cerebello-thalamic activity drives an abnormal motor network into dystonic tremor

Dystonic tremor syndromes are highly burdensome and treatment is often inadequate. This is partly due to poor understanding of the underlying pathophysiology. Several lines of research suggest involvement of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and the basal ganglia in dystonic tremor syndromes, but their role is unclear. Here we aimed to investigate the contribution of the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and the basal ganglia to the pathophysiology of dystonic tremor syndrome, by directly linking tremor fluctuations to cerebral activity during scanning. In 27 patients with dystonic tremor syndrome (dystonic tremor: n=23; tremor associated with dystonia: n=4), we used concurrent accelerometery and functional MRI during a posture holding task that evoked tremor, alternated with rest. Using multiple regression analyses, we separated tremor-related activity from brain activity related to (voluntary) posture holding. Using dynamic causal modelling, we tested for altered effective connectivity between tremor-related brain regions as a function of tremor amplitude fluctuations. Finally, we compared grey matter volume between patients (n=27) and matched controls (n=27). We found tremor-related activity in sensorimotor regions of the bilateral cerebellum, contralateral ventral intermediate (VIM) and ventro-oralis posterior nuclei (VOp) of the thalamus, contralateral primary motor cortex (hand area), contralateral pallidum, and the bilateral frontal cortex (laterality with respect to the tremor). Grey matter volume was increased in patients compared to controls in the portion of contralateral thalamus also showing tremor-related activity, as well as in bilateral medial and left lateral primary motor cortex, where no tremor-related activity was present. Effective connectivity analyses showed that inter-regional coupling in the cerebello-thalamic pathway, as well as the thalamic self-connection, were strengthened as a function of increasing tremor power. These findings indicate that the pathophysiology of dystonic tremor syndromes involves functional and structural changes in the cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and pallidum. Deficient input from the cerebellum towards the thalamo-cortical circuit, together with hypertrophy of the thalamus, may play a key role in the generation of dystonic tremor syndrome.

Comparative connectivity correlates of dystonic and essential tremor deep brain stimulation

The pathophysiology of dystonic tremor and essential tremor remains partially understood. In patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor or essential tremor, deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the thalamus or posterior subthalamic area has evolved into a promising treatment option. However, the optimal DBS targets for these disorders remains unknown. This retrospective study explored the optimal targets for DBS in essential tremor and dystonic tremor using a combination of volumes of tissue activated estimation and functional and structural connectivity analyses. We included 20 patients with dystonic tremor who underwent unilateral thalamic DBS, along with a matched cohort of 20 patients with essential tremor DBS. Tremor severity was assessed preoperatively and approximately 6 months after DBS implantation using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale. The tremor-suppressing effects of DBS were estimated using the percentage improvement in the unilateral tremor-rating scale score contralateral to the side of implantation. The optimal stimulation region, based on the cluster centre of gravity for peak contralateral motor score improvement, for essential tremor was located in the ventral intermediate nucleus region and for dystonic tremor in the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region along the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border (4 mm anterior and 3 mm superior to that for essential tremor). Both disorders showed similar functional connectivity patterns: a positive correlation between tremor improvement and involvement of the primary sensorimotor, secondary motor and associative prefrontal regions. Tremor improvement, however, was tightly correlated with the primary sensorimotor regions in essential tremor, whereas in dystonic tremor, the correlation was tighter with the premotor and prefrontal regions. The dentato-rubro-thalamic tract, comprising the decussating and non-decussating fibres, significantly correlated with tremor improvement in both dystonic and essential tremor. In contrast, the pallidothalamic tracts, which primarily project to the ventralis oralis posterior nucleus region, significantly correlated with tremor improvement only in dystonic tremor. Our findings support the hypothesis that the pathophysiology underpinning dystonic tremor involves both the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network and the basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical network. Further our data suggest that the pathophysiology of essential tremor is primarily attributable to the abnormalities within the cerebello-thalamo-cortical network. We conclude that the ventral intermediate nucleus/ventralis oralis posterior nucleus border and ventral intermediate nucleus region may be a reasonable DBS target for patients with medication-refractory dystonic tremor and essential tremor, respectively. Uncovering the pathophysiology of these disorders may in the future aid in further improving DBS outcomes.