chromosomal imbalances
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

218
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

45
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 58 (S1) ◽  
pp. 16-16
Author(s):  
E. Bevilacqua ◽  
J. Jani ◽  
R. Chaoui ◽  
E.A. Suk ◽  
R. Palma‐Dias ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liselot M. Mus ◽  
Stéphane Van Haver ◽  
Mina Popovic ◽  
Wim Trypsteen ◽  
Steve Lefever ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTHuman embryonic stem cells (hESCs) and embryonal tumors share a number of common features including a compromised G1/S checkpoint. Consequently, these rapidly dividing hESCs and cancer cells undergo elevated levels of replicative stress which is known to induce genomic instability causing chromosomal imbalances. In this context, it is of interest that long-term in vitro cultured hESCs exhibit a remarkable high incidence of segmental DNA copy number gains, some of which are also highly recurrent in certain malignancies such as 17q gain (17q+). The selective advantage of DNA copy number changes in these cells has been attributed to several underlying processes including enhanced proliferation. We hypothesized that these recurrent chromosomal imbalances become rapidly embedded in the cultured hESCs through a replicative stress driven Darwinian selection process. To this end, we compared the effect of hydroxyurea induced replicative stress versus normal growth conditions in an equally-mixed cell population of isogenic euploid and 17q+ hESCs. We could show that 17q+ hESCs rapidly overtook normal hESCs. Our data suggest that recurrent chromosomal segmental gains provide a proliferative advantage to hESCs under increased replicative stress, a process that may also explain the highly recurrent nature of certain imbalances in cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 8328
Author(s):  
Ivan Y. Iourov ◽  
Svetlana G. Vorsanova ◽  
Yuri B. Yurov ◽  
Maria A. Zelenova ◽  
Oxana S. Kurinnaia ◽  
...  

Mechanisms for somatic chromosomal mosaicism (SCM) and chromosomal instability (CIN) are not completely understood. During molecular karyotyping and bioinformatic analyses of children with neurodevelopmental disorders and congenital malformations (n = 612), we observed colocalization of regular chromosomal imbalances or copy number variations (CNV) with mosaic ones (n = 47 or 7.7%). Analyzing molecular karyotyping data and pathways affected by CNV burdens, we proposed a mechanism for SCM/CIN, which had been designated as “chromohelkosis” (from the Greek words chromosome ulceration/open wound). Briefly, structural chromosomal imbalances are likely to cause local instability (“wreckage”) at the breakpoints, which results either in partial/whole chromosome loss (e.g., aneuploidy) or elongation of duplicated regions. Accordingly, a function for classical/alpha satellite DNA (protection from the wreckage towards the centromere) has been hypothesized. Since SCM and CIN are ubiquitously involved in development, homeostasis and disease (e.g., prenatal development, cancer, brain diseases, aging), we have metaphorically (ironically) designate the system explaining chromohelkosis contribution to SCM/CIN as the cytogenomic “theory of everything”, similar to the homonymous theory in physics inasmuch as it might explain numerous phenomena in chromosome biology. Recognizing possible empirical and theoretical weaknesses of this “theory”, we nevertheless believe that studies of chromohelkosis-like processes are required to understand structural variability and flexibility of the genome.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Cristina Vargas ◽  
Nima Mesbah Ardakani ◽  
Daniel D. Wong ◽  
Fiona M Maclean ◽  
Joseph Kattampallil ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ivan Y Iourov ◽  
Svetlana G Vorsanova ◽  
Yuri B. Yurov ◽  
Maria A Zelenova ◽  
Oxana S Kurinnaia ◽  
...  

Mechanisms for somatic chromosomal mosaicism (SCM) and chromosomal instability (CIN) are incompletely understood. During SNP-array molecular karyotyping and bioinformatic analyses of children with neurodevelopmental disorders and congenital malformations (n=612), we observed colocalizaion of regular chromosomal imbalances or copy number variations (CNV) with mosaic ones (n=47 or 7.7%). Analyzing molecular karyotyping data and pathways affected by CNV burdens, we proposed a mechanism for SCM/CIN, which had been designated as “chromohelkosis” (from the Greek chromosome ulceration/open wound). Briefly, structural chromosomal imbalances are likely to cause local instability (“wreckage”) at the breakpoints, which results either to partial/whole chromosome loss (e.g. aneuploidy) or elongation of duplicated regions. Accordingly, a function for classical/alpha satellite DNA (protection from the wreckage towards the centromere) has been hypothesized. Since SCM and CIN are ubiquitously involved in development, homeostasis and disease (e.g. prenatal development, cancer, brain diseases, aging), we have metaphorically (ironically) designate the system explaining chromohelkosis contribution to SCM/CIN as the cytogenomic “theory of everything” like the homonymous theory in physics inasmuch as it might explain numerous phenomena in chromosome biology. Recognizing possible empirical and theoretical weaknesses of this “theory”, we nevertheless believe that studies of chromohelkosis-like processes are required to understand structural variability and flexibility of the genome.


2020 ◽  
Vol 114 (3) ◽  
pp. e437
Author(s):  
Merve Polat ◽  
Volkan Baltaci ◽  
Leyla Ozer ◽  
Evrim Unsal ◽  
Suleyman Aktuna

2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (5) ◽  
pp. 643-723 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Jackson ◽  
Leah Marks ◽  
Gerhard H.W. May ◽  
Joanna B. Wilson

Genetics plays a role, to a greater or lesser extent, in all diseases. Variations in our DNA and differences in how that DNA functions (alone or in combinations), alongside the environment (which encompasses lifestyle), contribute to disease processes. This review explores the genetic basis of human disease, including single gene disorders, chromosomal imbalances, epigenetics, cancer and complex disorders, and considers how our understanding and technological advances can be applied to provision of appropriate diagnosis, management and therapy for patients.


2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Haibo Li ◽  
Minjuan Liu ◽  
Min Xie ◽  
Qin Zhang ◽  
Jingjing Xiang ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (8) ◽  
pp. 387-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serena Patrone ◽  
Irena Maric ◽  
Mariangela Rutigliani ◽  
Francesco Lanza ◽  
Matteo Puntoni ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document