hypocenter location
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

37
(FIVE YEARS 5)

H-INDEX

6
(FIVE YEARS 0)

Structures ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 3684-3702
Author(s):  
Sahithi Veggalam ◽  
K.S.K. Karthik Reddy ◽  
Surendra Nadh Somala


2021 ◽  
Vol 873 (1) ◽  
pp. 012026
Author(s):  
Gazali Rachman ◽  
Bagus Jaya Santosa ◽  
Supriyanto Rohadi ◽  
Andri Dian Nugraha ◽  
Shindy Rosalia

Abstract Molucca Sea collision zone is a region which has very complex geology and tectonic setting, producing high seismicity and volcanoes activities. In this study, we have determined hypocenter location around the region using local & regional network of Agency of Meteorology, Climatology, and Geophysics, Indonesia (BMKG). We used 1,647 events that recorded by 32 seismic stations. We repicked the P-and S-phase manually and have been succesfully determined ~17,628 P and ~17,628 S arrival times. The P- and S-arrival times are used to determine the hypocenter location by applying NonLinLoc method which estimating the probability density function (PDF) using the oct-tree importance sampling algorithm. Our preliminary results show that the seismicity beneath the Molucca Sea collision zone forming a double subduction pattern which is dipping westward under the Sangihe Arc, reaching a depth of ~ 600 km and eastward under the Halmahera Arc, reaching a depth of ~ 250 km. The seismicity pattern under the Sangihe Arc deepens to the north and the deep earthquake events increase in number. The seismicity is related to the Molucca Sea Plate which is dipping into west and east direction beneath Sangihe-Halmahera Arc. To have a further understanding of the complex tectonic activity in this area, our future work will focus on conducting a seismic tomographic inversion to determine the 3D seismic velocities structure around the Molucca Sea collision zone.



2021 ◽  
pp. 875529302110309
Author(s):  
Yara Daoud ◽  
Mayssa Dabaghi ◽  
Armen Der Kiureghian

The Dabaghi and Der Kiureghian stochastic near-fault ground motion model requires information about the source, site, and source-to-site geometry, including directivity parameters. Directivity parameters entail often unavailable knowledge of the rupture geometry and hypocenter location. This article presents methods to randomize the directivity parameters required to simulate near-fault ground motions. A first procedure is proposed where only the contributing fault, earthquake magnitude, and site location are known. Possible rupture directivity conditions are accounted for by randomizing the rupture geometry and hypocenter location. For this purpose, new predictive models of the rupture geometry parameters are developed for shallow crustal earthquakes with magnitudes between 5.2 and 7.9. To allow validation of synthetic motions with NGA-West2 models, a second procedure randomizes the rupture geometry and both hypocenter and site locations. Results show a general agreement between the two methods.



Author(s):  
Steven Roecker ◽  
Ariane Maharaj ◽  
Sean Meyers ◽  
Diana Comte

ABSTRACT Double differencing of body-wave arrival times has proved to be a useful technique for increasing the resolution of earthquake locations and elastic wavespeed images, primarily because (1) differences in arrival times often can be determined with much greater precision than absolute onset times and (2) differencing reduces the effects of unknown, unmodeled, or otherwise unconstrained variables on the arrival times, at least to the extent that those effects are common to the observations in question. A disadvantage of double differencing is that the system of linearized equations that must be iteratively solved generally is much larger than the undifferenced set of equations, in terms of both the number of rows and the number of nonzero elements. In this article, a procedure based on demeaning subsets of the system of equations for hypocenters and wavespeeds that preserves the advantages of double differencing is described; it is significantly more efficient for both wavespeed-only tomography and joint hypocenter location-wavespeed tomography. Tests suggest that such demeaning is more efficient than double differencing for hypocenter location as well, despite double-differencing kernels having fewer nonzeros. When these subsets of the demeaned system are appropriately scaled and simplified estimates of observational uncertainty are used, the least-squares estimate of the perturbations to hypocenters and wavespeeds from demeaning are identical to those obtained by double differencing. This equivalence breaks down in the case of general, observation-specific weighting, but tests suggest that the resulting differences in least-squares estimates are likely to be inconsequential. Hence, demeaning offers clear advantages in efficiency and tractability over double differencing, particularly for wavespeed tomography.



Geosciences ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 37
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Zhang ◽  
Diego Arosio ◽  
Azadeh Hojat ◽  
Luigi Zanzi

Passive seismic methods are increasingly used in monitoring unstable rock slopes that are likely to cause rockfalls. Event classification is a basic step in microseismic monitoring. However, the classification of events generated by the propagation of fractures and rockfalls is still uncertain due to their similar features in the time and frequency domains. Hypocenter localization might be a powerful tool to distinguish events generated by fracture propagation from those caused by rockfalls. In this study, a classification procedure based on hypocenter location was validated using a selected subset of high-quality data recorded by a five-geophone network installed on a steep rock slope in Northern Italy. Considering the complexity and heterogeneity of the rock mass, a 3D velocity model that was derived from a tomographic experiment was used. We performed the localization using the equal differential time method. The location results fairly fit our expectations on suspected rockfall events because most signals were located near the rock face. However, only 4 out of 20 suspected fracture events were unquestionably confirmed as fractures being located inside the rock mass and far enough from the rock face. Further improvements in location accuracy are still necessary to distinguish suspected fracture events located close to the rock face from rockfalls. This study demonstrates that hypocenter location is a promising method to improve the final classification of microseismic events.



2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. Hao ◽  
U.B. Waheed ◽  
M. Babatunde ◽  
L. Eisner


2019 ◽  
Vol 289 ◽  
pp. 34-44
Author(s):  
Barbara Orecchio ◽  
Silvia Scolaro ◽  
Josep Batlló ◽  
Graziano Ferrari ◽  
Debora Presti ◽  
...  




2017 ◽  
Vol 107 (6) ◽  
pp. 2613-2623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debora Presti ◽  
Giancarlo Neri ◽  
Barbara Orecchio ◽  
Silvia Scolaro ◽  
Cristina Totaro


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document