formica podzolica
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

3
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (46) ◽  
pp. e2101427118
Author(s):  
German Lagunas-Robles ◽  
Jessica Purcell ◽  
Alan Brelsford

Sexually reproducing organisms usually invest equally in male and female offspring. Deviations from this pattern have led researchers to new discoveries in the study of parent–offspring conflict, genomic conflict, and cooperative breeding. Some social insect species exhibit the unusual population-level pattern of split sex ratio, wherein some colonies specialize in the production of future queens and others specialize in the production of males. Theoretical work predicted that worker control of sex ratio and variation in relatedness asymmetry among colonies would cause each colony to specialize in the production of one sex. While some empirical tests supported theoretical predictions, others deviated from them, leaving many questions about how split sex ratio emerges. One factor yet to be investigated is whether colony sex ratio may be influenced by the genotypes of queens or workers. Here, we sequence the genomes of 138 Formica glacialis workers from 34 male-producing and 34 gyne-producing colonies to determine whether split sex ratio is under genetic control. We identify a supergene spanning 5.5 Mbp that is closely associated with sex allocation in this system. Strikingly, this supergene is adjacent to another supergene spanning 5 Mbp that is associated with variation in colony queen number. We identify a similar pattern in a second related species, Formica podzolica. The discovery that split sex ratio is determined, at least in part, by a supergene in two species opens future research on the evolutionary drivers of split sex ratio.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
German Lagunas-Robles ◽  
Jessica Purcell ◽  
Alan Brelsford

AbstractSexually reproducing organisms usually invest equally in male and female offspring. Deviations from this pattern have led researchers to new discoveries in the study of parent-offspring conflict, genomic conflict, and cooperation. Some social insect species exhibit the unusual population-level pattern of split sex ratio, wherein some colonies specialize in the production of future queens and others specialize in the production of males. Theoretical work focused on the relatedness asymmetries emerging from haplodiploid inheritance, whereby queens are equally related to daughters and sons, but their daughter workers are more closely related to sisters than to brothers, led to a series of testable predictions and spawned many empirical studies of this phenomenon. However, not all empirical systems follow predicted patterns, so questions remain about how split sex ratio emerges. Here, we sequence the genomes of 138 Formica glacialis workers from 34 male-producing and 34 gyne-producing colonies to determine whether split sex ratio is under genetic control. We identify a supergene spanning 5.5 Mbp that is closely associated with sex allocation in this system. Strikingly, this supergene is adjacent to another supergene spanning 5 Mbp that is associated with variation in colony queen number. We identify a similar pattern in a second related species, Formica podzolica. The discovery that split sex ratio is determined, at least in part, by a supergene in two species opens a new line of research on the evolutionary drivers of split sex ratio.Significance StatementSome social insects exhibit split sex ratio, wherein some colonies produce future queens and others produce males. This phenomenon spawned many influential theoretical studies and empirical tests, both of which have advanced our understanding of parent-offspring conflicts and cooperation. However, some empirical systems did not follow theoretical predictions, indicating that researchers lack a comprehensive understanding of the drivers of split sex ratio. Here, we show that split sex ratio is associated with a large genomic region in two ant species. The discovery of a genetic basis for sex allocation in ants provides a novel explanation for this phenomenon, particularly in systems where empirical observations deviate from theoretical predictions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 133 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-312
Author(s):  
Christine E. Sosiak ◽  
Mari West ◽  
James R.N. Glasier

We describe the discovery of Polyergus bicolor, an obligate slave-making ant species, as a new provincial record in Alberta. This species was previously known mostly from eastern Canada and the northeastern United States and has been sparsely collected: only once in the past 50 years. Polyergus bicolor was discovered parasitizing Formica podzolica, which is also a new host for the species. This discovery marks a significant expansion of both range and host for P. bicolor.


2018 ◽  
Vol 44 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madison A. Sankovitz ◽  
Michael D. Breed ◽  
Helen F. McCreery

2009 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 205-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlotte Nielsen ◽  
Anurag A. Agrawal ◽  
Ann E. Hajek

Social insects defend their own colonies and some species also protect their mutualist partners. In mutualisms with aphids, ants typically feed on honeydew produced by aphids and, in turn guard and shelter aphid colonies from insect natural enemies. Here we report that Formica podzolica ants tending milkweed aphids, Aphis asclepiadis , protect aphid colonies from lethal fungal infections caused by an obligate aphid pathogen, Pandora neoaphidis . In field experiments, bodies of fungal-killed aphids were quickly removed from ant-tended aphid colonies. Ant workers were also able to detect infective conidia on the cuticle of living aphids and responded by either removing or grooming these aphids. Our results extend the long-standing view of ants as mutualists and protectors of aphids by demonstrating focused sanitizing and quarantining behaviour that may lead to reduced disease transmission in aphid colonies.


2004 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-316 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. DeHeer ◽  
J. M. Herbers

1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Deslippe ◽  
R. Savolainen

1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard J. Deslippe ◽  
Riitta Savolainen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document