physical therapist education
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

146
(FIVE YEARS 34)

H-INDEX

15
(FIVE YEARS 1)

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly D. Wynarczuk ◽  
Kendra Gagnon ◽  
Joseph Schreiber ◽  
Mary Jane Rapport ◽  
Alyssa LaForme Fiss ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Catherine Bilyeu ◽  
Amanda Sharp ◽  
Katherine Myers

Current issue: Clinical instructors (CIs) are instrumental in the development of competent, entry-level physical therapist graduates. Despite this key role, CIs are often deficient in formal knowledge of the learning sciences that influence quality of clinical education experiences. Clinical education stakeholders also lack a standardized and consistent approach to defining and assessing clinical teaching skills, resulting in an inability to provide adequate feedback and growth opportunities for CIs. Perspective: A gap exists between qualitative descriptions of clinical teaching behaviors and the ability to objectively assess those behaviors in CIs. Grounded in the Model of Excellence in Physical Therapist Education, this perspective calls attention to and proposes steps toward excellence in clinical education. Defining essential competencies of clinical teaching in the physical therapy profession requires a systematic approach. The competencies established through this approach then become the foundation for creating a meaningful assessment tool of CI performance. Implications for clinical education: Developing educator competencies and a related assessment tool for CIs allows for the provision of meaningful feedback, the creation of targeted professional development programs, and opportunities for recognition of clinical teaching excellence. Without effective CIs, new graduates may be inadequately equipped to contribute to the profession’s vision of educational excellence.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Alyssa LaForme Fiss ◽  
Mary Jane Rapport ◽  
Kendra Gagnon ◽  
Kimberly Wynarczuk ◽  
Eydie Kendall ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Katy Mitchell ◽  
Jennifer Ellison ◽  
Elke Schaumberg ◽  
Peggy Gleeson ◽  
Christina Bickley ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Ng ◽  
Kuang Cheng Seow ◽  
Laetitia MacDonald ◽  
Christina Correia ◽  
Alan Reubenson ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective The objectives of this cross-sectional qualitative study were to explore the perspectives of students enrolled in one physical therapist undergraduate education program in Australia about their experience with transitioning to full eLearning and student recommendations to improve the learning experience during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Seven focus groups with 28 undergraduate physical therapist students were conducted following the transitioning to full eLearning as a result of strict physical distancing measures. Focus group questions explored the students’ experiences of the transition from face-to-face to full eLearning approach and the students’ recommendations for improving future eLearning experiences. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Results The 3 themes identified were: (1) students presenting heightened negative feelings such as anxiety, stress, and reduced motivation to study; (2) students continuing to value the face-to-face learning, as it provided social support and facilitated feedback from peers and tutors; (3) student recommendations for eLearning included having online lectures and supplementary videos but face-to-face practical classes and developing healthy learning habits such as scheduled times for studying, exercise, and other activities that regulate stress. Conclusions The transition to a full eLearning approach in an undergraduate physical therapist education program during the COVID-19 pandemic revealed that students had heightened negative emotions due to the pandemic. Students valued face-to-face practical classes to learn and receive social support from peers and tutors. Student recommendations to future eLearning suggested changes to curriculum development geared toward a greater blended approach to learning. Blended learning may include using online lectures instead of face-to-face lectures and online resources to supplement student learning of practical skills. Impact As higher education moves toward a more blended approach, lessons learned from this study can help educators design future physical therapist education programs. The findings can also assist programs in delivering a full eLearning approach as the COVID-19 pandemic continues.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Dickson ◽  
Beth Deschenes ◽  
Peggy Gleeson ◽  
Jason Zafereo

Abstract Objective The Commission on Accreditation in Physical Therapy Education has introduced a requirement that 50% of core faculty members in a physical therapist education program have an academic doctoral degree, which many programs are not currently meeting. Competition between programs for prestige and resources may explain the discrepancy of academic achievement among faculty despite accreditation standards. The purpose of this study was to identify faculty and program characteristics that are predictive of programs having a higher percentage of faculty with academic doctoral degrees. Methods Yearly accreditation data from 231 programs for a 10-year period were used in a fixed-effects panel analysis. Results For a 1 percentage point increase in the number of core faculty members, a program can expect a decline in academic doctoral degrees by 14% with all other variables held constant. For a 1% increase in either reported total cost or expenses per student, a program could expect a 7% decline in academic doctoral degrees with all other variables held constant. Programs that have been accredited for a longer period of time could expect to have proportionately more faculty members with academic doctoral degrees. Conclusions Programs may be increasing their core faculty size to allow faculty with academic doctoral degrees to focus on scholarly productivity. The percentage of faculty with academic doctoral degrees declines as programs increase tuition and expenditures, but this may be due to programs’ tendency to stratify individuals (including part-time core faculty) into teaching- and research-focused efforts to maximize their research prowess and status. Impact This study illuminates existing relationships between physical therapist faculty staffing, time spent in research versus teaching, and program finances. The results of this study should be used to inform higher education policy initiatives aimed to lower competitive pressures and the costs of professional education.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document