collaborative programming
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

73
(FIVE YEARS 32)

H-INDEX

9
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Vol 59 (Autumn 2021) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Koetz ◽  
Veronica Bullock ◽  
Nicholas Burgmeier ◽  
Angie Manuel ◽  
Rod Williams

Partnerships between natural resources agencies and Extension have existed for years and Extension has served in many roles. These roles include writing grants, facilitating meetings, training, and designing collaborative programming. Herein, we highlight a partnership between Purdue Extension and the Indiana Division of State Parks (IDSP) where Purdue Extension used an existing partnership to create programming about eastern hellbenders in a format presentable by interpretive naturalists, Extension educators, and K-12 teachers. The program increased pre/post knowledge gain scores for attendees by 129.27%. This model has successfully expanded Purdue Extension’s outreach efforts while satisfying a need expressed by IDSP. Forming reciprocal partnerships with nontraditional partners can have a tremendous positive impact on the success of outreach and education efforts.


2021 ◽  
pp. 111107
Author(s):  
Mojtaba Shahin ◽  
Christabel Gonsalvez ◽  
Jon Whittle ◽  
Chunyang Chen ◽  
Li Li ◽  
...  

Electronics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (14) ◽  
pp. 1728
Author(s):  
Carmen Lacave ◽  
Ana Isabel Molina

Collaborative learning activities have become a common practice in current university studies due to the implantation of the EHEA. However, the COVID-19 pandemic has led to a radical and abrupt change in the teaching–learning model used in most universities, and in the way students’ group work is carried out. Given this new situation, our interest is focused on discovering how computer science students have approached group programming tasks. For this purpose, we have designed a cross-sectional pilot study to explore, from both social and technological points of view, how students carried out their group programming activities during the shutdown of universities, how they are doing them now, when social distance must be maintained, and what they have missed in both situations. The results of the study indicate that during the imposed confinement, the students adopted a programming model based on work division or distributed peer programming, and very few made use of synchronous distributed collaboration tools. After the lockdown, the students mostly opted for a model based on collaborative programming and there was an increased use of synchronous distributed collaboration tools. The specific communication, synchronization, and coordination functionalities they considered most useful or necessary were also analyzed. Among the desirable features included in a software for synchronous distributed programming, the students considered that having an audio-channel can be very useful and, possibly, the most agile method to communicate. The video signal is not considered as very necessary, being in many cases rather a source of distraction, while textual communication through a chat, to which they are very accustomed, is also well valued. In addition, version control and the possibility of recovering previous states of the practical projects were highly appreciated by the students, and they considered it necessary to record the individual contributions of each member of the team to the result.


2021 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-402
Author(s):  
Ahmad Al-Jarrah ◽  
Abdel Karim Baareh ◽  
Ahmad Smadi ◽  
Roba Jabali

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (CSCW3) ◽  
pp. 1-29
Author(s):  
Kimberly Michelle Ying ◽  
Fernando J. Rodríguez ◽  
Alexandra Lauren Dibble ◽  
Kristy Elizabeth Boyer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document