The effects of ideological value framing and symbolic racism on pro-environmental behavior

Environmental degradation continues to be one of the greatest threats to human well-being, posing a disproportionate burden on communities of color. Environmental action, however, fails to reflect this urgency, leaving social-behavioral research at the frontier of environmental conservation, as well as environmental justice. Broad societal consensus for environmental action is particularly sparse among conservatives. The lack of even small personal sacrifices in favor of the environment could be attributed to the relatively low salience of environmental threats to white Americans and the partisan nature of environmentalism in America. We evaluate if (1) environmental action is causally related to the ideological value framing of an environmental issue; and (2) if the perceived race of impacted communities influences environmental action as a function of racial resentment. With this large-scale, original survey experiment examining the case of air-pollution, we find weak support for the first, but we do not find evidence for the second. We advance our understanding of environmental justice advocacy and environmental inaction in the United States. Protocol registration The stage 1 protocol for this Registered Report was accepted in principle on 10 June 2021. The protocol, as accepted by the journal, can be found at 10.6084/m9.figshare.14769558.

Strategic Value Framing for Brownfield Redevelopment

Objectives/Scope Field A is a brownfield that has been produced for 52 years under natural depletion via a total of 207 strings. The field comprises 7000 ft of reservoir section, multiple fault blocks and over 200 separate reservoir units has been produced to date. Despite the long period of production, the field recovery factor (RF) to date is only 29%. To improve the RF, a strategic assest value framing exercise was carried out to identify the additional subsurface opportunities i.e. infill well drilling, secondary recovery, late field life appraisal in underdeveloped fault blocks as well as adopting standardized low well concepts and the design one build many facility design concept to reduce cost and accelerate development. The main purpose of the exercise was to capture the overall opportunities for the field, outline the roadmap and phase out the project with suitable wells and facilities design to bring down the cost for project commerciality. Methods, Procedures, Process The integrated workflow of the exercise involved subsurface, drilling, facilities, operations and economist and took a total of 3 months to complete. The process started off with a RF benchmarking exercise utilizing a newly developed inhouse RF benchmarking tool to compare the current attained vs the attainable RF(EUR) and identify incremental reserves. The number of new wells required to develop the incremental reserves was estimated by analyzing EUR per well trends over time. This analysis indicated that on a campaign basis the current realistic average EUR per well is in the order of 0.7-1.0 MMstb per well. The preliminary well placements are guided by bubble maps of all reservoirs, in a top to bottom & block by block approach, to identify underdeveloped areas and combining these areas into stacks of reservoirs that can be combined and developed with simpler wells from existing or future facilities. The drilling team has designed a few simple trajectories to penetrate shallower to deeper reservoirs and proposed the drilling center within a radius of 2 km from the targets. This approach differs from the object-based approach where individual high EUR targets are chased with more complex wells drilled from a specific location during a platform campaign. Result, Observations, Conclusions Potential additional reserves and 6 new projects have been identified which would result in a field recovery factor increase of 11%, of which 2 projects are being accelerated to realize early first oil. Timelines for all the projects have been mapped out with the aim of completing all within the next 10 years. A dedicated project management team has been formed to support the project from the initial stage. Detail Full Field Review study will be conducted to mature all the opportunities up to development stage. The listed projects will follow the low cost well guideline established in the framing as well as fast track facility design concept. Novel/added value The strategic value framing exercise is a systematic approach that provide a total picture of the future opportunities to optimize field production/EUR and maximize commercial value of brownfield redevelopment.

Application of Enhanced Asset Value Framing AVF Approach to Unlock Significant Potential Value in Highly Compartmentalised and Stacked Reservoirs

As host authority for all hydrocarbon resources in Malaysia, Petroliam Nasional Berhad (PETRONAS) Malaysia Petroleum Management (MPM) has championed Asset Value Framing (AVF) since 2016 to facilitate identification of asset enhancing opportunities and to establish a roadmap for opportunity realization. This paper is the continuation of the previous paper (SPE-196486) which illustrated opportunity identification through AVF. In 2019, PETRONAS had embarked on benchmarking oil reservoirs for all Malaysian oil reservoirs which was used for the AVF process to improve economic recovery factor of an oil field and booking new contingent resources. This paper focuses on enhanced AVF approach to integrate subsurface, wells, surface and operations; coupled with recommended improvements to AVF process from lookback exercise, reservoir performance assessment, data analytic through reservoir benchmarking tool and assessment of analogue reservoirs. A case study will be shared from one of the largest oilfields in Sarawak wherein enhanced AVF approach was applied to unlock significant potential of which conventional techniques faced challenges in identifying opportunities. Field B consists of multi-layered depositional system with numerous fault-bounded accumulation areas. Benchmarking process was performed for each of reservoir units to estimate the potential recovery factor and degree of complexity. In reservoirs where current estimates of recovery factor were lower than the benchmark, these were screened to be considered for identification of new opportunities through AVF process. Additionally, benchmarking process was applied to evaluate optimal well spacing, need for secondary recovery and identification of potential challenges for future development planning. A paradigm shift was undertaken to AVF process itself whereby focused development plan was considered for the entire column of rock within every fault block - instead of chasing oil by reservoirs. This subsequently allowed an integrated approach to optimize well type and cost, infill and water injection well count, completion design and overall evacuation strategy. Application of reservoir benchmarking significantly improved the delivery of AVF process by identification of recovery gaps in the field and application of learnings from better performing reservoirs. This coupled with Enhanced AVF workflow approach of focused development plan has resulted a roadmap for Field B to achieve ultimate recovery factor of 40% through a number of potential development opportunities within the next few years. An enhanced AVF workflow coupled with benchmarking process has facilitated field potential evaluation within two months, leading to efficient decision making, resource accrual and value creation for all stakeholders. This workflow can be replicated to other fields, maximizing economic reserves, increasing asset value, and defining the development roadmap.

I Am What I Pledge: The Importance of Value Alignment for Mobilizing Backers in Reward-Based Crowdfunding

Crowdfunding has emerged as an important alternative financing tool for entrepreneurs. Extant research on the antecedents of crowdfunding success have produced divergent results. By applying the cross-disciplinary lens of strategic linguistic framing, that is, framing campaign messages in a way that is salient and that resonates with the values of the audience, we experimentally examine the role of value framing for a successful campaign outcome. Our results indicate that altruistically framed campaigns have a higher chance for funding compared to campaigns that emphasize egoistic or environmental motives, but even more importantly, that message framing needs to be aligned with the personal values of the backers. As such, our study highlights important similarities between resource mobilization in social movements and in crowdfunding.

Competitive Frames and Accuracy Motivations

To examine the psychological mechanisms involved in value framing effects, the present study extends previous research on competitive frames and tests the mediating role of ambivalence in value framing effects. The current research delves into the nuances of value framing effects and helps explain processes such as applicability. Two web-based experiments were conducted using value frames related to two different issues, civil liberties and gay rights. Findings from moderated-mediation models indicate that when individuals are exposed to competitive frames they feel ambivalent. Because of this ambivalence, participants were more willing to seek information and showed increased online information-seeking behavior. However, these findings are true only in cases of individuals who are motivated to process the information. Implications are discussed.

A prize for a price? HE marketisation and the question of value

Assessing the value of HE has now become embroiled in discussions of its functions and outputs in the context of increased marketisation. Much of this is based on a fairly crude value framing concerning the economic impact, return value and, measured performance, derived from HE. This article explores the concept of value associated with the work of Dewey and applies this to current market principles and dynamics in HE, particularly the distinctions he draws between value means and ends in the process of valuation. As well as examining the tensions and possible interplays between intrinsic and instrumental values, and ways of bridging this tension, the article analyses the implications this has for HE in its current market form. It critically engages with the characteristic ways in which dominant measurement and markers of value are applied in assessing the value generated by institutions and discusses the implications for market-orientated HE systems.