Arthroscopic Patellar Tendon Debridement and Distal Pole Osteoplasty for Recalcitrant Patellar Tendinopathy

Background: Chronic patellar tendinosis is an overuse injury of the patellar tendon that commonly afflicts jumping athletes. Indications: For patients with refractory symptoms that do not respond to extensive physical therapy and rest, surgical management may be considered. Although both open and arthroscopic treatments have been described, arthroscopic treatment allows for more direct access to the diseased dorsal portion of the tendon and allows for faster return to activities and sport. Technique Description: Arthroscopic treatment involves debridement of the diseased portion of the patella tendon and osteoplasty of the distal pole of the patella. The infrapatellar fat pad is first debrided using an arthroscopic shaver and radiofrequency ablation device to the level of the dorsal surface of the patellar tendon. Under direct arthroscopic visualization and corresponding to the location of edema noted on the magnetic resonance image, the diseased portion of the patellar tendon is gently debrided with an arthroscopic shaver. Next, an osteoplasty of the distal pole of the patella is performed to facilitate bleeding and healing of the diseased tendon as well as eliminate any mechanical impingement. Any calcifications within the enthesis can be removed using an arthroscopic biter and resector. An arthroscopic resector is then used to decorticate and smoothen the distal pole of the patella to the level of healthy, bleeding cancellous bone. Results: Significant improvements in pain and function have been reported with arthroscopic treatment for chronic patellar tendinosis. Patients can expect a 90% return to sport rate following the procedure, with return to preinjury function as soon as 3 to 5 months. This procedure is well tolerated with minimal complications reported. Discussion: Arthroscopic patellar tendon debridement and distal pole osteoplasty can be used to treat chronic patellar tendinosis refractory to nonoperative treatment. Improvements in pain and function have been reported with this technique, along with a faster return to sport compared with traditional open techniques.

Suture Anchor Versus Transosseous Tunnel Repair for Inferior Pole Patellar Fractures Treated With Partial Patellectomy and Tendon Advancement: A Biomechanical Study

Background: Comminuted inferior pole patellar fractures can be treated in numerous ways. To date, there have been no studies comparing the biomechanical properties of transosseous tunnels versus suture anchor fixation for partial patellectomy and tendon advancement of inferior pole patellar fractures. Hypothesis: Suture anchor repair will result in less gapping at the repair site. We also hypothesize no difference in load to failure between the groups. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Ten cadaveric knee extensor mechanisms (5 matched pairs; patella and patellar tendon) were used to simulate a fracture of the extra-articular distal pole of the patella. The distal simulated fracture fragment was excised, and the patellar tendon was advanced and repaired with either transosseous bone tunnels through the patella or 2 single-loaded suture anchors preloaded with 1 suture per anchor. Load to failure and elongation from cycles 1 to 250 between 20 and 100 N of force were measured, and modes of failure were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using a paired 2-tailed Student t test. Results: The suture anchor group had less gapping during cyclic loading as compared with the transosseous tunnel group (mean ± SD, 6.83 ± 2.23 vs 13.30 ± 5.74 mm; P = .047). There was no statistical difference in the load to failure between the groups. The most common mode of failure was at the suture-anchor interface in the suture anchor group (4 of 5) and at the knot proximally on the patella in the transosseous tunnel group (4 of 5). Conclusion: Suture anchors yielded similar strength profiles and less tendon gapping with cyclic loading when compared with transosseous tunnels in the treatment of comminuted distal pole of the patellar fractures managed with partial patellectomy and patellar tendon advancement. Clinical Relevance: Suture anchors may offer robust repair and earlier range of motion in the treatment of fractures of the distal pole of the patella. Clinical randomized controlled trials would help clinicians better understand the difference in repair techniques and confirm the translational efficacy in clinical practice.

Lower pole of patella fractures treated with non-absorbable trans-osseous sutures: an effective surgical method to avoid implant related complications

<p><strong>Background: </strong>The treatment option for inferior pole of patella fracture is still being debated. Although tension‑band wiring is the most widely used technique to treat patellar fractures, metal implant‑related complications such as implant failure, palpable hardware are very common and additional procedures are often necessary to treat the complications. The aim of the study was to evaluate the functional results in patients with inferior pole of patella fracture treated by trans-osseous non-absorbable suture fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods:</strong> Patients who underwent trans-osseous suture fixation by no. 5 Ethibond for post-traumatic distal pole patella fracture were included in the study. This was a prospective study conducted at a tertiary care Government Hospital in Kolkata, between December 2018 to May 2020. All patients were followed up at an interval of 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months and 9 months. Bostman score was used to assess the functional outcomes of the patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outcome at final follow-up was assessed with Bostman scoring system. In a total of 11 patients, 8 (72.8%) patients showed excellent and 3 (27.2%) patients had good results during the final follow-up. None of the patients demonstrated unsatisfactory result. At the end of 9 months, the average Bostman score for 11 patients was 27.9.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The trans-osseous suturing with non-absorbable sutures is a safe and effective fixation technique for the treatment of distal pole patella fractures. It allows for rapid recovery with minimal implant‑related complications. It also reduces the re-surgery rates significantly.</p>

The effect of surgery for basal osteoarthritis of the thumb on dart thrower’s motion

This study aimed to identify the effects of basal thumb surgery on the range of dart thrower’s motion. Thirteen fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were placed in a customized jig. Simulated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid joint fusion was carried out on all specimens. Half the specimens then underwent trapeziectomy and the rest had excision of the distal pole of the scaphoid. Simulated scaphotrapeziotrapezoid fusion reduced the range of dart thrower’s motion to 89% of the range in the intact wrists, from a mean of 117° to 104°. Although this reduction is not large, it was statistically significant. Simulated trapeziectomy caused a very small increase in dart thrower’s motion range compared with the range in the intact wrists. Simulated distal pole of scaphoid excision did not change the range of dart thrower’s motion. These results may inform preoperative decisions for surgical management of basal osteoarthritis of the thumb.

Antegrade Versus Retrograde Technique for Fixation of Scaphoid Waist Fractures: A Comparison of Screw Placement

Background Scaphoid waist fractures are often treated using headless compression screws using dorsal or volar approaches. Objectives The purpose of this study is to compare differences in screw position using a volar (retrograde) or dorsal (antegrade) approach. Patients and Methods A total of 82 patients were retrospectively evaluated: 41 treated with a volar and 41 with a dorsal approach were selected. Postoperative radiographs were reviewed by three observers who rated screw location in the proximal pole, waist, and distal pole. Results Thirty-four patients (83%) in the antegrade group had central screw placement in the waist of the scaphoid in posteroanterior and lateral planes compared with 14 (34.9%) in the retrograde group (p < 0.05). For the antegrade group, the screw was central in 217 of 246 zones (88.2%) compared with 127 of 246 (51.6%) in the retrograde group (p < 0.05). Conclusions The dorsal antegrade approach appears to allow the surgeon to achieve central screw placement along all three scaphoid regions. Level of Evidence This is Level III study.

Comparison of Fracture Location and Extent of Comminution in Isolated Scaphoid Fractures Versus Transscaphoid Fracture-Dislocations

Background: Isolated scaphoid fractures (ISFs) are common, whereas transscaphoid fracture-dislocations (TSFDs) are not. Scaphoid fracture location and the extent of comminution are factors that affect treatment and outcome. The purpose of this study is to compare the radiographic characteristics of ISFs with TSFDs associated with greater arc injury. Methods: This study is a retrospective review of all ISFs and TSFDs that presented to our institution during a 5-year period. Fracture location (along the long axis of the scaphoid) was calculated by dividing the distance from the proximal pole to the fracture by the entire length of the scaphoid. The extent of comminution was measured in millimeters along the mid-axis of the scaphoid and divided by the entire length of the scaphoid. Results: One-hundred thirty-eight scaphoid fractures in 137 patients were identified. One-hundred twelve fractures (81%) were ISFs, and 26 (19%) were associated with a TSFD. The mean fracture location was more proximal in TSFDs than in ISFs. However, fractures occurred in the distal third of the scaphoid in 12% of ISFs compared with 0% of TSFDs. Nine percent of ISFs demonstrated comminution as compared with 12% of TSFDs. Extent of comminution was 16% and 28% for ISFs and TSFDs, respectively. Conclusion: Scaphoid fractures associated with greater arc injuries are located more proximally and are more comminuted than ISFs, and distal pole fractures rarely occur in the setting of TSFDs. The increased incidence and extent of comminution in TSFDs may be suggestive of a higher energy injury mechanism.

Distal Pole Resection of the Scaphoid for the Treatment of Scaphotrapeziotrapezoid Osteoarthritis

Background: Distal pole resection of the scaphoid is one of the surgical techniques applied for the treatment of painful scaphotrapeziotrapezoid osteoarthritis (STT-OA). Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated midterm outcomes in a consecutive series of patients who underwent distal pole resection of the scaphoid: 13 patients (15 wrists) with a mean follow-up of 4.1 years. We examined objective functional and patient-reported outcome measures. In addition, we assessed the degree of dorsal intercalated segment instability (DISI) and postoperative complications. Results: All patients scored within a normal range on objective functional and patient-reported outcome measures. We observed a mild postoperative DISI deformity with an average lunocapitate angle of 22° (range, 0°-44°), which did not correlate with pain scores. In the opposite wrists, with and without STT-OA, the average lunocapitate angle was 6° (range, 0°-20°). Conclusions: According to this study, midterm results for distal pole resection of the scaphoid are satisfactory.

Radioscapholunate fusion with triquetrum and distal pole of scaphoid excision: long-term follow-up

The purpose of this study was to assess the long-term outcomes of radioscapholunate fusion, with and without distal pole of scaphoid excision and excision of the triquetrum. These compromised three operative groups. Seventeen patients were identified with a minimum of 10 years follow-up, with a mean of 15 years (range 10–19). Fifteen of the 17 patients were satisfied with their outcome. Two were converted to total wrist fusion. The mean outcomes scores were; pain visual analogue scale score 2.1/10, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand 29 and Modified Mayo Wrist score 60. Patients with excision of the triquetrum had a mean radial–ulnar arc increase of 10° compared with the other two groups, but this was not statistically significant. The mean space for the scaphocapitate joint was 1.7 mm and lunocapitate joint was 1.3 mm at latest follow-up. Close adherence to the indications and surgical technique provided a sustainable good clinical outcome. Patients who obtained a good result at 2 years were likely to achieve a good long-term outcome. Level of evidence: IV