Adenolipoma of the Breast: A Case Report

Adenolipoma of the breast is a rare tumor classified as a hamartomatous lesion. It is a well-circumscribed lesion composed of adipocytes and other breast tissues. The characteristic feature is a well-circumscribed mass containing radiolucent fat admixed with dense fibrous connective tissue surrounded by a thin radiopaque pseudo capsule. Microscopically, there is a mixture of ducts and lobules with adipose tissue. Ductal hyperplasia, adenosis, calcification, and apocrine metaplasia may occur within the hamartoma. These are rarely associated with malignancies and excision is considered curative. If these lesions are not detected clinically or radiologically, these remain unrecognized. Awareness of this poorly recognized benign entity would help avoid an incorrect diagnosis and unnecessary intervention. Here we present a case of a 35-year-old female diagnosed histologically as adenolipoma of the breast.

Papillary lesions of the breast

Papillary lesions of the breast represent a heterogeneous group of lesions including benign papillomas, papillomas with focal epithelial atypia, fully fledged ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or lobular neoplasia, papillary DCIS, encapsulated papillary carcinomas without or with invasion, solid papillary carcinomas, and invasive papillary carcinomas. A micropapillary pattern characterized by lack of fibrous stalks within the papillae is observed in micropapillary DCIS and invasive micropapillary carcinoma. In addition, a variety of other rare breast lesions reveals a papillary architecture such as tall cell carcinoma with reversed polarity (TCCRP) and mucinous cystadenocarcinoma, adenomyoepithelioma, and secretory carcinoma. In addition, benign lesions such as usual ductal hyperplasia, apocrine metaplasia, gynecomastia, and juvenile papillomatosis may show a papillary or micropapillary architecture. Fragments of a benign papilloma in a breast biopsy are considered a lesion of uncertain malignant potential (B3 in the European classification) and excision is mostly recommended. Although the knowledge about molecular pathology of papillary breast lesions has increased, there is not sufficient evidence for diagnostically useful molecular features, yet. The aim of this review is to provide an update on papillary and micropapillary lesions with emphasis on problematic areas for daily diagnostic work including biopsies.

Histologic Correlation of Breast Biopsies Presenting as Non-Mass Enhancing Lesions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Contemporary Single Institutional Series

Introduction/Objective Non-mass enhancement (NME) in breast tissue is an area of enhancement on MRI that appears distinct from background breast parenchyma, but lacks definitive features of a mass. NME is characterized by its internal enhancement pattern and distribution, and can represent benign, high risk, or malignant pathology. Given this considerable overlap, a core biopsy is often necessary for diagnosis and management. We aimed to elucidate the most frequent histologic findings found on breast biopsies for MRI NME. Methods Using our institutional database we identified 70 female patients with high risk status for breast cancer with MRI screen detected NME (BIRADS-4-suspicious for malignancy) that underwent subsequent biopsy procedure during the period of 01/2016-12/2017. Primary pathologic diagnoses were subcategorized as follows: malignant, atypical, benign mass-like lesions, fibrocystic changes (proliferative, nonproliferative), or “other” primary diagnoses. Results The median age of patients was 48 years (range: 22-76 years). Of the 70 patients, 66 underwent MRI-guided core biopsy, 3 underwent ultrasound-guided core biopsy and 1 underwent excisional biopsy. The primary diagnosis was analyzed. Of these 70 cases, 8 (11.4%) were malignant (7 with ductal carcinoma in situ and 1 with invasive ductal carcinoma), 1 (1.4%) had atypical lobular hyperplasia, and the remaining 61 (87.1%) showed benign findings (36 with fibrocystic changes (FCC), 22 benign mass-like lesions, 3 with other non-specific findings). The FCC were subcategorized as proliferative (usual ductal hyperplasia, columnar cell change, incidental radial scar, incidental intraductal papilloma, sclerosing adenosis, focal pseudoangiomatous stromal hyperplasia (PASH)) or nonprolifeative (stromal fibrosis, duct ectasia, apocrine metaplasia). Majority (61.1%) of FCC were both proliferative and nonproliferative, 22.2% proliferative only and 16.7% nonproliferative only. Benign mass-like lesions included PASH (45.4%), fibroadenomatoid nodule (22.7%), fat necrosis (18.2 %) and remaining had the diagnosis of clustered apocrine cysts, papillomatosis, and radial sclerosing lesion. Conclusion Less than a third of cases showed malignant findings and more than two-third of cases showed benign findings with a high rate of detection of proliferative lesions and PASH.

Fibroadenoma/benign phyllodes: a cytologic diagnostic challenge

Background: To study and compare cytomorphological features of histologically proven cases of benign phyllodes and cellular fibroadenoma.Methods: Smears of histologically-proven cases of benign phyllodes and cellular fibroadenoma in one year, were reviewed. The cellular fibroadenoma had epithelial and/or stromal hypercellularity. The stromal and epithelial components as well as the background cells were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed.Results: Number, cellularity and type of stromal fragments varied significantly in two groups. Higher number, intermediate to large-sized and hypercellular stromal fragments were commonly seen in phyllodes. Hypercellular (3+ cellularity) fragments were seen in 100% cases of phyllodes against 11.1% cases of fibroadenoma. Large-sized stromal fragments were found in 100% of phyllodes while in only 11.1% cases of fibroadenoma. The ratio of number of epithelial to stromal fragments was significantly high (58.5:1) in fibroadenoma against phyllodes (1.3:1). The epithelial architecture, atypia, apocrine metaplasia and presence of cystic macrophages did not very much in the two groups. The cellularity of the dispersed cells in background did not reveal significant difference though the type of cells varied; the proportion of long and short spindle cells was higher in PT group while proportion of oval cells was higher in FA group.Conclusion: The number, cellularity and nature of stromal fragments, ratio of epithelial to stromal fragments, cellularity and type of background cells are helpful in distinguishing benign phyllodes from cellular fibroadenoma. The identification of these features can improve the pickup rate of phyllodes tumor, thereby assisting proper management.