Regulation of Gene Expression of phiEco32-like Bacteriophage 7-11

Salmonella enterica serovar Newport bacteriophage 7-11 shares 41 homologous ORFs with Escherichia coli phage phiEco32 and both phages encode a protein similar to bacterial RNA polymerase promoter specificity  subunit. Here, we investigated the temporal pattern of 7-11 gene expression during the infection and compared it to the previously determined transcription strategy of phiEco32. Using primer extension and in vitro transcription assays we identified eight promoters recognized by host RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing 7-11  subunit SaPh711_gp47. These promoters are characterized by a bipartite consensus GTAAtg-(16)-aCTA and are located upstream of late phage genes. While dissimilar from single-element middle and late promoters of phiEco32 recognized by holoenzyme formed by the phi32_gp36  factor, the 7-11 late promoters are located at genome positions similar to those of phiEco32 middle and late promoters. Two early 7-11 promoters are recognized by RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing host primary σ70 factor. Unlike the case of phiEco32, no shut off of σ70-dependent transcription is observed during 7-11 infection and there are no middle promoters. These differences can be explained by the fact that phage 7-11 does not encode a homologue of phi32_gp79, an inhibitor of host and early phage transcription and an activator of transcription by the phi32_gp36-holoenzyme.

T7Max transcription system

Efficient cell-free protein expression from linear DNA templates has remained a challenge primarily due to template degradation. Here we present a modified T7 RNA polymerase promoter that acts to significantly increase the yields of both transcription and translation within in vitro systems. The modified promoter, termed T7Max, recruits standard T7 RNA polymerase, so no protein engineering is needed to take advantage of this method. This technique could be used with any T7 RNA polymerase- based in vitro protein expression system. Unlike other methods of limiting linear template degradation, the T7Max promoter increases transcript concentration in a T7 transcription reaction, providing more mRNA for translation.

A virulent and pathogenic infectious clone of Senecavirus A

Senecavirus A (SVA) is a picornavirus that circulates in swine populations worldwide causing vesicular disease (VD) in affected animals. Here we developed a reverse genetics system for SVA based on the well-characterized wild-type SVA strain SD15-26 (wt SVA SD15-26). The full-length cDNA genome of SVA was cloned into a plasmid under a T7 RNA polymerase promoter. Following in vitro transcription, the genomic viral RNA was transfected into BHK-21 cells and rescue of infectious virus (rSVA SD15-26) was shown by inoculation of highly susceptible H1299 cells. In vitro characterization of the rSVA SD15-26 showed similar replication properties and protein expression levels as the wt SVA SD15-26. A pathogenesis study was conducted in 15-week-old finishing pigs to evaluate the pathogenicity and infection dynamics of the rSVA SD15-26 virus in comparison to the wt SVA SD15-26. Animals from both rSVA- and wt SVA SD15-26-inoculated groups presented characteristic SVA clinical signs (lethargy and lameness) followed by the development of vesicular lesions on the snout and/or feet. The clinical outcome of infection, including disease onset, severity and duration was similar in rSVA- and the wt SVA SD15-26-inoculated animals. All animals inoculated with rSVA or with wt SVA SD15-26 presented a short-term viremia, and animals from both groups shed similar amounts of virus in oral and nasal secretion, and faeces. Our data demonstrates that the rSVA SD5-26 clone is fully virulent and pathogenic in pigs, presenting comparable pathogenesis and infection dynamics to the wt SVA SD15-26 strain. The infectious clone generated here is a useful platform to study virulence determinants of SVA, and to dissect other aspects of SVA infection biology, pathogenesis and persistence.

DNA sequence, physics, and promoter function: Analysis of high-throughput data On T7 promoter variants activity

RNA polymerase/promoter recognition represents a basic problem of molecular biology. Decades-long efforts were made in the area, and yet certain challenges persist. The usage of certain most suitable model subjects is pivotal for the research. System of T7 bacteriophage RNA-polymerase/T7 native promoter represents an exceptional example for the purpose. Moreover, it has been studied the most and successfully applied to aims of biotechnology and bioengineering. Both structural simplicity and high specificity of this molecular duo are the reason for this. Despite highly similar sequences of distinct T7 native promoters, the T7 RNA-polymerase enzyme is capable of binding respective promoter in a highly specific and adjustable manner. One explanation here is that the process relies primarily on DNA physical properties rather than nucleotide sequence. Here, we address the issue by analyzing massive data recently published by Komura and colleagues. This initial study employed Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) in order to quantify activity of promoter variants including ones with multiple substitutions. As a result of our work substantial bias in simultaneous occurrence of single-nucleotide sequence alterations was found: the highest rate of co-occurrence was evidenced within specificity loop of binding region while the lowest — in initiation region of promoter. If both location and a kind of nucleotides involved in replacement (both initial and resulting) are taken into consideration, one can easily note that N to A substitutions are most preferred ones across the whole 19 b.p.-long sequence. At the same time, N to C are tolerated only at crucial position in recognition loop of binding region, and N to G are uniformly least tolerable. Later in this work the complete set of variants was split into groups with mutations (1) exclusively in binding region; (2) exclusively in melting region; (3) in both regions. Among these three groups second comprises extremely few variants (at triple-digit rate lesser than in two other groups, 46 versus over one and six thousand). Yet these are all promoter with substantial to high activity. This group two appeared heterogenous by primary sequence; indeed, upon further subdivision into above versus below average activity subgroups first one was found to comprise promoters with negligible conservation at [Formula: see text]2 position of melting region; the second was hardly conserved in this region at all. This draws our attention to perfect consensus sequence of class III T7 promoter with [Formula: see text]2 nucleotide randomized (all four are present by one to several copies in the previously published source dataset), the picture becomes even more pronounced. We therefore suggest that mutations at the position therefore do not cause significant changes in terms of promoter activity. At the same time, such modifications dramatically change DNA physical properties which were calculated in our study (namely electrostatic potential and propensity to bend). One possible suggestion here is that [Formula: see text]2 nucleotide might function as a generic switch; if so, substitution [Formula: see text]2A to [Formula: see text]2T has important regulatory consequences. The fact that that [Formula: see text]2 b.p. is the most evidently different nucleotide between class II versus class III promoters of T7 genome and that it also distinguishes the class III promoter in T7 genome versus promoters of its relative but reproductively isolated bacteriophage T3. In other words, it appears feasible that mutation at [Formula: see text]2 nucleotide does not impede promoter activity yet alter its physical properties thus affecting differential RNA polymerase/promoter interaction.