DISTANCE EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY OF TEACHING ENGLISH AT HIGHER SCHOOL: WORK EXPERIENCES

Experience of implementing distance education technology at the International Institute of Design and Service during the corona virus infection is discussed. Distance education is a basis of the contemporary educational process that poses new tasks for the institution of higher education linked to the realization of open education, using pedagogical technologies to widen the access to any types of information, promote the dissemination of knowledge and automate control and management of the teaching/learning process. The potential of Internet, electronic and information platforms in foreign language teaching is vast, yet their possibilities have not been fully used till now. It is noted that the specifics of «English» teaching distantly requires renovation of the education process principles, selection of optimal teaching methods and development of qualitatively new methodological materials. Questionnaire results reflecting the main difficulties and problems of teachers doing this technology are presented.

Student and Faculty Perceptions of Live Synchronous Distance Education for Allied Health Students Following Program Expansion to a Rural Campus

Background & Purpose: Distance education (DE) is a means to meet allied health workforce needs in rural locations where healthcare worker shortages are apparent. Five allied health programs were expanded to a rural campus teaching synchronously using distance education technology. The purpose of this convergent parallel mixed methods study was to explore perceptions of allied health students and faculty at two campus locations. Methods: Quantitative and qualitative information were collected through a survey of students and faculty (physical therapy, physician assistant, and medical imaging [diagnostic medical sonography, radiography, magnetic resonance imaging] programs). Both campuses served as live and distance sites depending on instructor location and area of content expertise. For example, morning courses may be taught live from one campus, and afternoon classes taught live from the other campus. Only one program, physical therapy, offered labs by distance education. Response distributions were compared for questions by campus using Cochran-Armitage trend tests and analyzed de-identified qualitative comments using constant comparisons to establish themes. Results: Student (n=121) and faculty (n=19) mostly agreed distance education technology was effective for teaching and learning. Significant differences were found in student opinions about receiving a similar educational experience between the two campuses. More students at the Main campus somewhat or strongly disagreed (n=34, 37%) it was similar compared to the Rural campus (n= 5, 17%, p=0.024). There were no comments specifically related to the physical therapy lab experience. Open-ended comment themes included training, purposeful engagement of both campus locations, and setting clear expectations. Conclusions: Although differences in learning experiences exist between the main and rural campus locations; the results indicated using distance education technology is an effective means to deliver the curriculum. Both students and faculty commented about the lack of experience with the educational technology before implementation. Synchronous, distance education offers the opportunity for program expansion and effective delivery of curriculum content. Using the results of this study can enhance future education in allied health professions using synchronous distance education technology.