bluefin killifish
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

32
(FIVE YEARS 3)

H-INDEX

16
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Hao Chang ◽  
Julian Catchen ◽  
Rachel L Moran ◽  
Angel G Rivera-Colón ◽  
Yu-Chun Wang ◽  
...  

Abstract Sensory systems allow for the transfer of environmental stimuli into internal cues that can alter physiology and behaviour. Many studies of visual systems focus on opsins to compare spectral sensitivity among individuals, populations, and species living in different lighting environments. This requires an understanding of the cone opsins, which can be numerous. The bluefin killifish is a good model for studying the interaction between environments and visual systems as they are found in both clear springs and tannin-stained swamps. We conducted a genome-wide screening and demonstrated that the bluefin killifish has nine cone opsins: one SWS1 (354 nm), two SWS2 (SWS2B: 359 nm, SWS2A: 448 nm), two RH2 (RH2-2: 476 nm, RH2-1: 537 nm), and four LWS (LWS-1: 569 nm, LWS-2: 524 nm, LWS-3: 569 nm, LWS-R: 560 or 569 nm). These nine cone opsins were located on four scaffolds. One scaffold contained the two SWS2 and three of the four LWS opsins in the same syntenic order as found in other cyprinodontoid fishes. We also compared opsin expression in larval and adult killifish under clear water conditions, which mimic springs. Two of the newly discovered opsins (LWS-2 and LWS-3) were expressed at low levels (< 0.2 %). Whether these opsins make meaningful contributions to visual perception in other contexts (i.e., swamp conditions) is unclear. In contrast, there was an ontogenetic change from using LWS-R to LWS-1 opsin. Bluefin killifish adults may be slightly more sensitive to longer wavelengths, which might be related to sexual selection and/or foraging preferences.



Copeia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chia-Hao Chang ◽  
Rebecca C. Fuller


Author(s):  
Brian Mahardja ◽  
Andrew Goodman ◽  
Alisha Goodbla ◽  
Andrea Schreier ◽  
Catherine Johnston ◽  
...  

Biological invasion by non-native species has been identified as one of the major threats to native fish communities worldwide. The fish community of San Francisco Estuary is no exception, as the estuary has been recognized as one of the most invaded on the planet and the system has been impacted significantly by these invasions. Here, we summarize the introduction and probable establishment of a new species in the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, the Bluefin Killifish (Lucania goodei), as discovered by the US Fish and Wildlife Service Delta Juvenile Fish Monitoring Program (DJFMP). The DJFMP has conducted a large-scale beach seine survey since 1976, and it is the longest-running monitoring program in the San Francisco Estuary that extensively monitors the shallow-water nearshore habitat. Possibly introduced as discarded aquarium fish within the vicinity of the Delta Cross Channel, Bluefin Killifish is a close relative of the Rainwater Killifish (Lucania parva), another non-native fish species that has been present in the San Francisco Estuary system for decades. Studies in their native range suggest that Bluefin Killifish will fill a similar niche to Rainwater Killifish, albeit with a more freshwater distribution. The potential ecological impact of Bluefin Killifish remains unclear in the absence of additional studies. However, we have been able to track the spread of the species within the Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta through the existence of long-term monitoring programs. Our findings demonstrate the value of monitoring across various habitats for the early detection and proactive management of invasive species.



2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emma L. Berdan ◽  
Rebecca C. Fuller ◽  
Genevieve M. Kozak

ABSTRACTUnderstanding how speciation occurs and how reproductive barriers contribute to population structure at a genomic scale requires elucidating the genetic architecture of reproductive isolating barriers. In particular, it is crucial to determine if loci underlying reproductive isolation are genetically linked or if they are located on sex chromosomes, which have unique inheritance and population genetic properties. Bluefin killifish (Lucania goodei) and rainwater killifish (L. parva) are closely related species that have diverged across a salinity gradient and are reproductively isolated by assortative mating, hybrid male infertility, viability of hybrid offspring at high salinities, as well as reduced overall fitness of F2 offspring and backcrosses to L. goodei. We conducted QTL mapping in backcrosses between L. parva and L. goodei to determine the genetic architecture of sex determination, mate attractiveness, fertility, and salinity tolerance. We find that the sex locus appears to be male determining and located on a chromosome that has undergone a Robertsonian fusion in L. parva relative to L. goodei. We find that the sex locus on the fused chromosome is involved in several genomic incompatibilities, which affect the survival of backcrossed offspring. Among the backcrossed offspring that survived to adulthood, we find that one QTL for male attractiveness to L. goodei females is closely linked to this sex locus on chromosome 1. Males homozygous for L. goodei alleles at the sex locus laid more eggs with L. goodei females. QTL associated with salinity tolerance were spread across the genome but did not tend to co-localize with reproductive isolation. Thus, speciation in this system appears to be driven by reinforcement and indirect selection against hybrids rather than direct natural selection for salinity tolerance. Our work adds to growing evidence that sex chromosome evolution may contribute to speciation.



2018 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 396-400
Author(s):  
Chia‐Hao Chang ◽  
Jessica E. Schult ◽  
Jonathan Sanders ◽  
Shih‐Hui Liu ◽  
Rebecca C. Fuller


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
pp. 499-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa D Mitchem ◽  
Shannon Stanis ◽  
Nicholas M Sutton ◽  
Zachary Turner ◽  
Rebecca C Fuller




PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e3595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Lessios

Understanding how individual photoreceptor cells factor in the spectral sensitivity of a visual system is essential to explain how they contribute to the visual ecology of the animal in question. Existing methods that model the absorption of visual pigments use templates which correspond closely to data from thin cross-sections of photoreceptor cells. However, few modeling approaches use a single framework to incorporate physical parameters of real photoreceptors, which can be fused, and can form vertical tiers. Akaike’s information criterion (AICc) was used here to select absorptance models of multiple classes of photoreceptor cells that maximize information, given visual system spectral sensitivity data obtained using extracellular electroretinograms and structural parameters obtained by histological methods. This framework was first used to select among alternative hypotheses of photoreceptor number. It identified spectral classes from a range of dark-adapted visual systems which have between one and four spectral photoreceptor classes. These were the velvet worm,Principapillatus hitoyensis, the branchiopod water flea,Daphnia magna, normal humans, and humans with enhanced S-cone syndrome, a condition in which S-cone frequency is increased due to mutations in a transcription factor that controls photoreceptor expression. Data from the Asian swallowtail,Papilio xuthus, which has at least five main spectral photoreceptor classes in its compound eyes, were included to illustrate potential effects of model over-simplification on multi-model inference. The multi-model framework was then used with parameters of spectral photoreceptor classes and the structural photoreceptor array kept constant. The goal was to map relative opsin expression to visual pigment concentration. It identified relative opsin expression differences for two populations of the bluefin killifish,Lucania goodei. The modeling approach presented here will be useful in selecting the most likely alternative hypotheses of opsin-based spectral photoreceptor classes, using relative opsin expression and extracellular electroretinography.



2014 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 158-167 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. M. Johnson ◽  
R. C. Fuller


2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 036021 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Phamduy ◽  
G Polverino ◽  
R C Fuller ◽  
M Porfiri


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document