FACIAL WOUND ASSESSMENT KIT

Facial wounds are a frequent reason for emergency room visits. The goals of laceration repair are to achieve hemostasis, avoid infection, restore function to the involved tissues, and achieve optimal cosmetic results with minimal scarring. Therefore, these cases are most appropriately managed by plastic surgeons who have a thorough knowledge of anatomy, aesthetic sense, and meticulous expertise in atraumatic tissue manipulation, combined with the surgical skill to repair any structure. You need to know what to do and what not to do : whether to suture or leave open. What local anesthesia to use and how. What equipment to use (and have it available beforehand). Whether to give antibiotic therapy and what kind. How to avoid aesthetic or functional after-effects. Which dressing to use depending on the state of the wound. This article will serve as an aid to wound management and review repair techniques for high-risk areas of the face.

213 A Novel, Cost-Effective and Convenient Model for Simulating Facial Wound Repair

Introduction We describe the use of a novel synthetic simulation pad for learning complex facial wound management including local flaps. The simulation pad is a cost effective and convenient model of facial wounds. We have compared the use of animal tissue to the simulation pad in the context of a workshop for surgical trainees and collected feedback from delegates. Methods Feedback was collected from 14 of 16 attending delegates. Results It was clear from feedback that animal tissue is not an ideal model of facial wounds with 71% of delegates stating that they did not consider it to be high-fidelity. The synthetic pad was rated more favourably with 100% of delegates reporting that it was a valuable exercise and well designed for local flaps. Conclusions It is imperative that training opportunities are high quality and useful to clinical practice. Techniques learnt in the context of a course or workshop are more valuable where targeted practice may occur following learning. The use of a synthetic pad is more amenable to continued practice where it may be taken home following a workshop. Feedback from this event suggests a well-designed synthetic pad is more useful than animal tissue in learning local flaps.

Local and Regional Blocks for Complex Facial Wound Repair

The location, severity, and associated injuries of the head and neck trauma dictate the type and treatment location needed for that particular patient. An in-depth knowledge of local and regional block options is vital to the proper management of facial wounds at the bedside, decreasing need for general anesthesia, anesthesia-related complication, length of hospital stay, and overall hospital costs. This article will discuss local and regional block options for the upper-face, midface, and lower face including dentition; complications of local and regional blocks and how to prevent them; and recent advances in local anesthesia. In addition, conscious sedation as an adjunct to local/regional blocks in children or patients with special needs will be discussed.

Endoscopy-Aided Combined Intraoral and Cervical Approach for a Huge Parapharyngeal Benign Tumor

We introduce here our surgical approach for the removal of a huge parapharyngeal tumor in 3 cases. Surgery was done under general anesthesia using transnasal intubation. Transoral manipulation was performed first. Using a tongue retractor and an angle widener, a wide surgical field was provided. Incision was made on the palate around the tumor. Tumor was separated from the surrounding tissue, preserving the tumor capsule. Then, a 5-cm small skin incision was made. Both parotid and submandibular glands were pushed upward, and the parapharyngeal space was opened. The tumor was also separated from the surrounding tissue. These manipulations were done under endoscopic observation. Finally, the tumor was pushed laterally and safely removed intraorally. After removal of the tumor, the wounds were closed, and vacuum drainage was settled for a few days. No apparent problems, such as malocclusion and facial palsy, occurred, and the patients were free from disease for more than 10 years. For the removal of a large parapharyngeal tumor, the mandibular swing approach is usually used; however, this approach is invasive, and certain sequelae, such as facial wound and malocclusion, may occur. Our technique enables the safe and less invasive removal of such a huge parapharyngeal benign lesion.

Avatars in Pain: Visible Harm Enhances Mind Perception in Humans and Robots

Previous research has shown that when people read vignettes about the infliction of harm upon an entity appearing to have no more than a liminal mind, their attributions of mind to that entity increased. Currently, we investigated if the presence of a facial wound enhanced the perception of mental capacities (experience and agency) in response to images of robotic and human-like avatars, compared with unharmed avatars. The results revealed that harmed versions of both robotic and human-like avatars were imbued with mind to a higher degree, irrespective of the baseline level of mind attributed to their unharmed counterparts. Perceptions of capacity for pain mediated attributions of experience, while both pain and empathy mediated attributions of abilities linked to agency. The findings suggest that harm, even when it appears to have been inflicted unintentionally, may augment mind perception for robotic as well as for nearly human entities, at least as long as it is perceived to elicit pain.

Pterional versus superciliary keyhole approach: direct comparison of approach-related complaints and satisfaction in the same patient

OBJECTIVEThe objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the level of patient satisfaction and approach-related patient complaints between a superciliary keyhole approach and a pterional approach.METHODSPatients who underwent an ipsilateral superciliary keyhole approach and a contralateral pterional approach for bilateral intracranial aneurysms during an 11-year period were contacted and asked to complete a patient satisfaction questionnaire. The questionnaire covered 5 complaint areas related to the surgical approaches: craniotomy-related pain, sensory symptoms in the head, cosmetic complaints, palpable cranial irregularities, and limited mouth opening. The patients were asked to rate the 5 complaint areas on a scale from 0 (asymptomatic or very pleasant) to 4 (severely symptomatic or very unpleasant). Finally, the patients were asked to rate the level of overall satisfaction related to each surgical procedure on a visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (most unsatisfactory) to 100 (most satisfactory).RESULTSA total of 21 patients completed the patient satisfaction questionnaire during a follow-up clinic visit. For the superciliary procedures, no craniotomy-related pain, palpable irregularities, or limited mouth opening was reported, and only minor sensory symptoms (numbness in the forehead) and cosmetic complaints (short linear operative scar) were reported (score = 1) by 1 (4.8%) and 3 patients (14.3%), respectively. Compared with the pterional approach, the superciliary approach showed better outcomes regarding the incidence of craniotomy-related pain, cosmetic complaints, and palpable irregularities, with a significant between-approach difference (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the VAS score for patient satisfaction was significantly higher for the superciliary approach (mean 95.2 ± 6.0 [SD], range 80–100) than for the pterional approach (mean 71.4 ± 10.6, range 50–90). Moreover, for the pterional approach, a multiple linear regression analysis indicated that the crucial factors decreasing the level of patient satisfaction were cosmetic complaints, craniotomy-related pain, and sensory symptoms, in order of importance (p < 0.05).CONCLUSIONSIn successful cases in which the primary surgical goal of complete aneurysm clipping without postoperative complications is achieved, a superciliary keyhole approach provides a much higher level of patient satisfaction than a pterional approach, despite a facial wound. For a pterional approach, the patient satisfaction level is affected by the cosmetic results, craniotomy-related pain, and numbness behind the hairline, in order of importance.