Local and Regional Blocks for Complex Facial Wound Repair

Author(s):  
Joy Obokhare

AbstractThe location, severity, and associated injuries of the head and neck trauma dictate the type and treatment location needed for that particular patient. An in-depth knowledge of local and regional block options is vital to the proper management of facial wounds at the bedside, decreasing need for general anesthesia, anesthesia-related complication, length of hospital stay, and overall hospital costs. This article will discuss local and regional block options for the upper-face, midface, and lower face including dentition; complications of local and regional blocks and how to prevent them; and recent advances in local anesthesia. In addition, conscious sedation as an adjunct to local/regional blocks in children or patients with special needs will be discussed.

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Rowe ◽  
B Rapaport ◽  
Y Al-Najjar ◽  
B Chaudhry ◽  
J Leow ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction We describe the use of a novel synthetic simulation pad for learning complex facial wound management including local flaps. The simulation pad is a cost effective and convenient model of facial wounds. We have compared the use of animal tissue to the simulation pad in the context of a workshop for surgical trainees and collected feedback from delegates. Methods Feedback was collected from 14 of 16 attending delegates. Results It was clear from feedback that animal tissue is not an ideal model of facial wounds with 71% of delegates stating that they did not consider it to be high-fidelity. The synthetic pad was rated more favourably with 100% of delegates reporting that it was a valuable exercise and well designed for local flaps. Conclusions It is imperative that training opportunities are high quality and useful to clinical practice. Techniques learnt in the context of a course or workshop are more valuable where targeted practice may occur following learning. The use of a synthetic pad is more amenable to continued practice where it may be taken home following a workshop. Feedback from this event suggests a well-designed synthetic pad is more useful than animal tissue in learning local flaps.


2020 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-016728
Author(s):  
Joshua S Catapano ◽  
Andrew F Ducruet ◽  
Stefan W Koester ◽  
Tyler S Cole ◽  
Jacob F Baranoski ◽  
...  

BackgroundTransradial artery (TRA) access for neuroendovascular procedures is associated with fewer complications than transfemoral artery (TFA) access. This study compares hospital costs associated with TRA access to those associated with TFA access for neurointerventions.MethodsElective neuroendovascular procedures at a single center were retrospectively analyzed from October 1, 2018 to May 31, 2019. Hospital costs for each procedure were obtained from the hospital financial department. The primary outcome was the difference in the mean hospital costs after propensity adjustment between patients who underwent TRA compared with TFA access.ResultsOf the 338 elective procedures included, 63 (19%) were performed through TRA versus 275 (81%) through TFA access. Diagnostic procedures were more common in the TRA cohort (51 of 63, 81%) compared with the TFA cohort (197 of 275, 72%), but the difference was not significant (p=0.48). The TRA cohort had a shorter length of hospital stay (mean (SD) 0.3 (0.5) days) compared with the TFA cohort (mean 0.7 (1.3) days; p=0.02) and lower hospital costs (mean $12 968 ($6518) compared with the TFA cohort (mean $17 150 ($10 946); p=0.004). After propensity adjustment for age, sex, symptoms, angiographic findings, procedure type, sheath size, and catheter size, TRA access was associated with a mean hospital cost of $2514 less than that for TFA access (95% CI −$4931 to −$97; p=0.04).ConclusionNeuroendovascular procedures performed through TRA access are associated with lower hospital costs than TFA procedures. The lower cost is likely due to a decreased length of hospital stay for TRA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117954762199457
Author(s):  
Daniele Emedoli ◽  
Maddalena Arosio ◽  
Andrea Tettamanti ◽  
Sandro Iannaccone

Background: Buccofacial Apraxia is defined as the inability to perform voluntary movements of the larynx, pharynx, mandible, tongue, lips and cheeks, while automatic or reflexive control of these structures is preserved. Buccofacial Apraxia frequently co-occurs with aphasia and apraxia of speech and it has been reported as almost exclusively resulting from a lesion of the left hemisphere. Recent studies have demonstrated the benefit of treating apraxia using motor training principles such as Augmented Feedback or Action Observation Therapy. In light of this, the study describes the treatment based on immersive Action Observation Therapy and Virtual Reality Augmented Feedback in a case of Buccofacial Apraxia. Participant and Methods: The participant is a right-handed 58-years-old male. He underwent a neurosurgery intervention of craniotomy and exeresis of infra axial expansive lesion in the frontoparietal convexity compatible with an atypical meningioma. Buccofacial Apraxia was diagnosed by a neurologist and evaluated by the Upper and Lower Face Apraxia Test. Buccofacial Apraxia was quantified also by a specific camera, with an appropriately developed software, able to detect the range of motion of automatic face movements and the range of the same movements on voluntary requests. In order to improve voluntary movements, the participant completed fifteen 1-hour rehabilitation sessions, composed of a 20-minutes immersive Action Observation Therapy followed by a 40-minutes Virtual Reality Augmented Feedback sessions, 5 days a week, for 3 consecutive weeks. Results: After treatment, participant achieved great improvements in quality and range of facial movements, performing most of the facial expressions (eg, kiss, smile, lateral angle of mouth displacement) without unsolicited movement. Furthermore, the Upper and Lower Face Apraxia Test showed an improvement of 118% for the Upper Face movements and of 200% for the Lower Face movements. Conclusion: Performing voluntary movement in a Virtual Reality environment with Augmented Feedbacks, in addition to Action Observation Therapy, improved performances of facial gestures and consolidate the activations by the central nervous system based on principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Salvador-Marín ◽  
Francisco Javier Ferrández-Martínez ◽  
Cort D. Lawton ◽  
Domingo Orozco-Beltrán ◽  
Jose Fernando Martínez-López ◽  
...  

AbstractTo assess the effects of a multidisciplinary care protocol on cost, length of hospital stay (LOS), and mortality in hip-fracture-operated patients over 65 years. Prospective cohort study between 2011 and 2017. The unexposed group comprised patients who did not receive care according to the multidisciplinary protocol, while the exposed group did. Variables analyzed were demographics, medical comorbidities, treatment, blood parameters, surgical delay, LOS, re-admissions, mortality, and a composite outcome considering in-hospital mortality and/or LOS > 10 days. We performed a Poisson regression and cost analysis. The cohort included 681 patients: 310 unexposed and 371, exposed. The exposed group showed a shorter surgical delay (3.0 vs. 3.6 days; p < 0.001), and a higher proportion received surgery within 48 h (46.1% vs. 34.2%, p = 0.002). They also showed lower rates of 30-day readmission (9.4% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.012), 30-day mortality (4.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.021), in-hospital mortality (3.5% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.015), and LOS (8.4 vs. 9.1 days, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed a protective effect of the protocol on the composite outcome (risk ratio 0.62, 95% CI 0.48–0.80, p < 0.001). Hospital costs were reduced by EUR 112,153.3. A multidisciplinary shared care protocol was associated with a reduction in the LOS, surgical delay, 30-day readmissions, and in-hospital and 30-day mortality, in hip-fracture-operated patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Carolina Quiroga Centeno ◽  
Orlando Navas ◽  
Juan Paulo Serrano ◽  
Sergio Alejandro Gómez Ochoa

Abstract Aim “To compare the outcomes of different surgical approaches for diaphragmatic hernia (DH) repair.” Material and Methods “Adult patients with a principal admitting diagnosis of uncomplicated DH registered in the National Inpatient Sample in the period 2010-2015 were included. Patients with obstruction, gangrene, or congenital hernias were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of complications, length of stay, and hospital charges. A multivariate logistic regression model adjusted by age, sex, elective admission, comorbidities, and hospital characteristics was used to analyze the impact of the surgical approach on the evaluated outcomes.” Results “A total of 14910 patients with DH were included (median age 65 years, 74% women). Abdominal approaches were the most commonly performed (78.9% laparoscopy and 13.6% open). Patients that underwent open abdominal and thoracic repairs had a higher risk of complications (sepsis, pneumonia, surgical site infection, prolonged postoperative ileus, and acute myocardial infarction), longer hospital stay, higher total hospital costs, and a significantly higher risk of mortality (OR 2.62. 95% CI 1.59-4.30 and OR 4.60; 95% CI 2.37-8.91, respectively) compared to patients that underwent laparoscopic abdominal repair. Individuals whose DH repair was performed through thoracoscopy had a similar mortality risk to those who underwent laparoscopic abdominal repair (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.11-6.43).” Conclusions “Nowadays, laparoscopy has become the most used approach for DH repair. In the present cohort, it was associated with better outcomes in terms of complications, length of hospital stay, and mortality, as well as lower health costs. Additional studies assessing hernia characteristics are required to validate this result.”


2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (10) ◽  
pp. 562-566
Author(s):  
Ma Yan ◽  
Zhou Xiaobo ◽  
Yuan Zhaoqi ◽  
Wang Xiuxia ◽  
Jin Rui ◽  
...  

Objective: The aim of this study was to present our experience with a kite flap in reconstruction of facial wounds after malignant tumour excision. Method: From October 2008 to September 2017, patients with facial malignant tumour were treated in the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Bazhou People's Hospital with kite flaps after complete excision. The survival rate, colour, cicatrix of the flap and patient satisfaction were recorded after surgery. Results: A total of 95 patients were included in the study. During follow-up, from six months to 8 years, all the kite flaps achieved primary closure and survived well, and the colour and texture were similar to the surrounding skin with no obvious scar. Dysfunction, complications and recurrence had not been reported. Conclusion: The kite flap may be a good option in reconstructing facial wounds after malignant tumour excision (diameters 1–5cm). It is a simple surgical method with sufficient blood supply and extensive adaptability. For patients in this study, no obvious scars were formed and the recipient site matched well with the donor site.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
In-Seung Yeo ◽  
Jung-Ah Park ◽  
Hye-In Lee ◽  
Ki-Seok Koh ◽  
Wu-Chul Song

Abstract The present study is to identify primarily the morphological characteristics in the growth proportion of the head and face for young Korean (8~24 years) and compare the magnitude of growth changes to the sex-related differences. Total 1,255 were divided into 3 age groups: childhood (8~10 years), adolescence (14~16 years), and young adult (20~24 years). The anthropometric assessments were performed with 11 landmarks on the head and facial dimensions. The standardized frontal and lateral head and face photographs were analyzed the craniofacial growth proportions and morphological features for the comparison of both sexes. The noteworthy differences of anthropometric measurements between sexes with growing were noted on the lower head height (22.6%, 17.8%), midface height (22.0%, 19.6%), lower face height (23.5%, 14.7%), and face length (21.1%, 14.9%), face breadth (14.8%, 11.3%) of males and females, respectively. Whereas the upper head height (7.9%, 6.0%) and upper face height (4.2%, 0%, respectively) were less growing features. The most remarkable changes are the dimension of midface height and lower face height in both sexes. The present study could demonstrate a fundamental example to elucidate the sex-related dimensional differences for the analysis of the growth proportion of both sexes in Koreans.


Author(s):  
Emilio Jiménez-Martínez ◽  
Guillermo Cuervo ◽  
Jordi Carratalà ◽  
Ana Hornero ◽  
Pilar Ciercoles ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Surgical site infections after craniotomy (SSI-CRAN) significantly impact patient outcomes and healthcare costs by increasing length of stay and readmission and reoperation rates. However, to our knowledge, no study has yet analysed the economic impact of a surgical care bundle for preventing SSI-CRAN. The aim is to analyse the hospital cost saving after implementation of a care bundle for the prevention of SSI-CRAN. Methods A retrospective cost-analysis was performed, considering two periods: pre-care bundle (2013–2015) and care bundle (2016–2017). A bottom-up approach was used to calculate the costs associated with infection in patients who developed a SSI-CRAN in comparison to those who did not, in both periods and on a patient-by-patient basis. The derived cost of SSI-CRAN was calculated considering: (1) cost of the antibiotic treatment, (2) cost of length of stay in the neurosurgery ward within the 1-year follow up period, (3) cost of the re-intervention, and (4) cost of the implant for cranial reconstruction, when necessary. Results A total of 595 patients were included in the pre-care bundle period and 422 in the care bundle period. Mean cost of a craniotomy procedure was approximately €8000, rising to €24,000 in the case of SSI-CRAN. Mean yearly hospital costs fell by €502,857 in the care bundle period (€714,886 vs. €212,029). Extra costs between periods were mainly due to increased length of hospital stay (€573,555.3 vs. €183,958.9; difference: €389,596.4), followed by the cost of implant for cranial reconstruction (€69,803.4 vs. €9,936; difference: €59,867.4). Overall, implementation of the care bundle saved the hospital €500,844.3/year. Conclusion The implementation of a care bundle for SSI-CRAN had a significant economic impact. Hospitals should consider the deployment of this multimodal preventive strategy to reduce their SSI-CRAN rates, and also their costs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document