stomach neoplasm
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8
(FIVE YEARS 1)

H-INDEX

1
(FIVE YEARS 0)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaolu Ren ◽  
Bo Jiang ◽  
Yixun Zhang

Abstract Backgroud: Colitis Cystica Profunda(CCP) is a rare benign medical condition and its exact etiology is still unknown. The clinical symptoms could be atypical and even asymptomatic, and also associated with several diseases. Most CCP patients may be misdiagnosed due to its complexity, and can be recognized after long-term medical treatment or surgical resection, especially in the elder or patients with relevant family history. Case presentation: In this case, a 58-year-old man presented with change in bowel habits for 3 years. Gastroscopy and colonoscopy were performed, and the lesions in stomach were resected. Colonoscopy revealed most lesions were significantly smaller after the resection of stomach neoplasm. Notably, these lesions recurred 3 years later. Conclusion: This case is an important reference for primary physician and pathologist to make correct diagnosis through initial endoscopic and pathological examination.


2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Carlos Ernesto Ruiz-Narváez ◽  
Jhon Edward Martínez-Rodríguez ◽  
Anuar Alonso Cedeño-Burbano ◽  
José Miguel Erazo-Tapia ◽  
Carlos David Pabón-Fernández ◽  
...  

Introducción. Por lo general, se ha descrito que la localización duodenal de la úlcera es más frecuente que la localización gástrica; sin embargo, en áreas con alta incidencia de cáncer gástrico la úlcera péptica parece tener una distribución anatómica distinta, existiendo predominio de la localización gástrica.Objetivo. Realizar una revisión narrativa de la literatura acerca de la distribución anatómica de la úlcera péptica en áreas con alta y baja incidencia de cáncer gástrico.Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda estructurada de la literatura en las bases de datos ProQuest, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, PubMed, LILACS, Embase, Trip, SciELO y Cochrane Library con los términos “Peptic ulcer” AND “stomach neoplasm”; la búsqueda se hizo en inglés con sus equivalentes en español y se limitó a estudios observacionales, cohortes y casos y controles.Resultados. Se encontraron alrededor de 50 artículos con información relevante para la presente revisión.Conclusión. La literatura disponible sugiere que la úlcera péptica predomina en áreas donde el cáncer gástrico tiene alta incidencia, mientras que en zonas donde la incidencia de la neoplasia es baja predomina la localización duodenal.


2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-106
Author(s):  
Carlos Ernesto Ruiz-Narváez ◽  
Jhon Edward Martínez-Rodríguez ◽  
Anuar Alonso Cedeño-Burbano ◽  
José Miguel Erazo-Tapia ◽  
Carlos David Pabón-Fernández ◽  
...  

Introducción. Por lo general, se ha descrito que la localización duodenal de la úlcera es más frecuente que la localización gástrica; sin embargo, en áreas con alta incidencia de cáncer gástrico la úlcera péptica parece tener una distribución anatómica distinta, existiendo predominio de la localización gástrica.Objetivo. Realizar una revisión narrativa de la literatura acerca de la distribución anatómica de la úlcera péptica en áreas con alta y baja incidencia de cáncer gástrico.Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda estructurada de la literatura en las bases de datos ProQuest, EBSCO, ScienceDirect, PubMed, LILACS, Embase, Trip, SciELO y Cochrane Library con los términos “Peptic ulcer” AND “stomach neoplasm”; la búsqueda se hizo en inglés con sus equivalentes en español y se limitó a estudios observacionales, cohortes y casos y controles.Resultados. Se encontraron alrededor de 50 artículos con información relevante para la presente revisión.Conclusión. La literatura disponible sugiere que la úlcera péptica predomina en áreas donde el cáncer gástrico tiene alta incidencia, mientras que en zonas donde la incidencia de la neoplasia es baja predomina la localización duodenal.


Author(s):  
Sonay Aydın ◽  
Erdem Fatihoğlu ◽  
Elif Ergün ◽  
Pınar Nercis Koşar

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 131-138
Author(s):  
Evelyn Aline Boscolo Ruivo ◽  
Juliana Rodrigues Correia Mello ◽  
Odete Mauad Cavenaghi ◽  
Alexandre Lins Werneck ◽  
Lucas Lima Ferreira

Abstract Introduction: In cancer patients, the reduced food intake causes weight loss and promotes protein-calorie malnutrition. This results in loss of lean body mass, which affects both skeletal muscles and respiratory muscles. Objective: Evaluate and compare the respiratory muscle strength of patients with esophageal and stomach neoplasia during the preoperative period. Methods: This is a cross-sectional study carried out with 24 patients of both genders hospitalized in a teaching hospital. They underwent a physical therapy evaluation composed of anthropometric data and measurement of respiratory muscle strength through manovacuometry. Paired and unpaired t-tests were used to compare the values obtained with the predicted equations. Results: Regarding the disease prevalence, 66.66%(16) of the individuals had stomach neoplasm and 33.33%(8) esophageal neoplasm. Of the patients with esophageal neoplasm, 100% were men with a mean age of 63 ± 9.16 years. Of those with stomach neoplasm, 68.75% were men with a mean age of 69.36 ± 10.92 years. Female patients with stomach neoplasm had significantly higher BMI (p = 0.01) than male patients, and they were classified as overweight. Both neoplasms had significantly lower real values (p ≤ 0.05) than predicted values at the maximal expiratory pressure. Conclusion: Patients with esophageal and stomach neoplasms in the preoperative period present reduction in the expiratory muscle strength. There were no statistically significant differences, when we compared the maximum respiratory pressures between the two types of neoplasms investigated.


2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Pil Hun Song ◽  
Hyun Sung ◽  
Jeonghun Lee ◽  
Won Jae Yoon ◽  
You Sun Kim ◽  
...  

22 Background: The treatment of stomach neoplasm was determined by the identification on of invasion extent and perigastric lymph node through endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). In this study, we investigated diagnostic accuracy of EUS examination before endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to both EUS and ESD for stomach neoplasms that were performed at Seoul Paik Hospital between January 2006 and July 2015. We compared the accuracy of EUS according to the location of lesion, tumor size and ulcer presence or absence on lesion. Results: 49 patients were enrolled in this study; their mean age was 64.14 ± 11.33 years. There were 40 male (81.6%) and 9 female (18.4%) patients. The cases of confined to the mucosa on pathology finding were 41 (83.6%) and involved to submucosal layer(sm) 1 were 3 (6.1%) and sm2 were 2 (4%) and sm3 were 1 (2%) and proper muscle layer were 2 (4%). The cases of lymphatic invasion were 2 (4%). The sensitivity and accuracy of antrum were 91.6 % (95% CI: 0.81-1.03) and 83.3 % (95% CI: 0.70-0.97), body of stomach were 92.3 % (CI: 0.78-1.07) and 83.3% (CI: 0.66-1.00), respectively. Whether lesions were no significant differences in any location. The tumor size was divided by smaller than 20 mm group, 20-30 mm group and more than 30 mm group. The smaller than 20 mm group, 20-30 mm group and more than 30 mm group were 36, 9, 2 patients. The remaining 2 patients were not described. The sensitivity and accuracy of smaller than 20 mm group were 96.6 % (95% CI: 0.90-1.03) and 83.3 % (CI: 0.71-0.95) and 2-30 mm group were 66.7 % (CI: 0.29-1.04) and 77.8 % (CI: 0.51-1.04), respectively. All patients were divided by ulcer presence or not. 27 patients were ulcer presence and 22 patients were not. The sensitivity and accuracy of ulcer presence group were 77.3 % (CI : 0.60-0.95) and 74 % (CI : 0.57-0.90), ulcer absence group were 95 % (CI : 0.85-1.04) and 91 % (CI : 0.79-1.02). Conclusions: The EUS for stomach neoplasm was reliable of lesion without ulcerous finding, smaller than 20 mm in diameter and irrespective of stomach neoplasm location.


2009 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 207-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyong Li ◽  
Ying Ge ◽  
Jinghong Liu ◽  
Keli Wang ◽  
Jianlin Wu

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (s1) ◽  
pp. S119-S122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuhiro Fujishiro ◽  
Naohisa Yahagi ◽  
Naomi Kakushima ◽  
Shinya Kodashima ◽  
Yosuke Muraki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document