Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate dose distributions on the superficial cardiac lesion surrounded by low-density lungs. We fabricated the 3-D printed cardiac phantom to insert in a multipurpose lungman phantom (KYOTO KAGAKU, Japan) for simulating a stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in ventricular tachycardia (VT) treatment. The cardiac phantom consists of 11 slabs with 1-cm intervals and is designed to insert radiochromic film (Gafchromic EBT3, Ashland Advanced Materials, Bridgewater, NJ) for film dosimetry. We used film dosimetry scanners (DosimetryPRO Advantage Red, Vidar Systems Corporation, Herndon, VA) with dedicated film dosimetry software (OP-IMRT, ver.1.6, IBA dosimetry, Germany). Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique was applied to optimize the dose distribution using the anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) in a radiation treatment planning (RTP) system (Eclipse v. 13.6, Varian, Palo Alto, CA). We used the 6-MV and 15-MV photon energies from a LINAC (Clinac iX, Varian, Palo Alto, CA) to investigate the planning target volume (PTV) under-dose effects due to the inner dose rebuild-up by energy dependence. The dose distributions in the VMAT plans with 6-MV and 15-MV showed good competitive coverages of the cardiac lesion without any severe underdose pattern. On the other side, the film dosimetry results showed significant dose variations near the interface of the cardiac lesion surrounded by low-density lung. The differences between the planning and the film dosimetry results revealed pretty well in both photon energies. The maximum dose differences in the cardiac PTV were ranged from 4.1–7.7% and 4.1–8.1% for 6-MV photon beams and 15-MV photon beams. Furthermore, EBT3 film measurements showed that the widths of 50% of profiles were reduced by 1.3 cm and 2.3 cm on 6-MV photon beams and 15-MV photon beams, respectively. In addition, 3-D printing techniques enabled quite challengeable dose measurements to reveal this kind of dose discrepancies in humanoid structures. This study showed that clinical cases like VT SBRT surrounded by severe inhomogeneous matter could induce wrongly to estimate appropriate dose delivery and to evaluate reasonable clinical outcomes.