uncontrolled manifold analysis
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

23
(FIVE YEARS 10)

H-INDEX

7
(FIVE YEARS 2)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Joon Kim ◽  
Joon Ho Lee ◽  
Nyeonju Kang ◽  
James H. Cauraugh

Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine whether altered interlimb coordination patterns across trials improved bimanual force control capabilities within a trial. Fourteen healthy young participants completed bimanual force control tasks at 5%, 25%, and 50% of maximum voluntary contraction with and without visual feedback. To estimate synergetic coordination patterns between hands across multiple trials, we analyzed our primary outcome measure by performing an uncontrolled manifold analysis. In addition, we calculated force accuracy, variability, and regularity within a trial to quantify task stabilization. Using Pearson’s correlation analyses, we determined the relation between the changes in bilateral motor synergies (i.e., a proportion of good variability relative to bad variability) and bimanual force control performance from no-vision to vision conditions. The findings revealed that the presence of visual feedback significantly increased bilateral motor synergies with a reduction of bad variability components across multiple trials, and decreased force error, variability, and regularity within a trial. Further, we observed significant positive correlations between higher bilateral motor synergies and increased improvements in force control capabilities. These findings suggested that bimanual synergetic coordination behaviors at the planning level modulated by external sensory feedback may be related to advanced task stabilization patterns at the execution level.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kyung Koh ◽  
Yang Sun Park ◽  
Da Won Park ◽  
Jae Kun Shim

AbstractProfessional dancers demonstrate an amazing ability to control their balance. However, little is known about how they coordinate their body segments for such superior control. In this study, we investigated how dancers coordinate body segments when a physical perturbation is given to their body. A custom-made machine was used to provide a short pulling impulse at the waist in the anterior direction to ten dancers and ten non-dancers. We used Uncontrolled Manifold analysis to quantify the variability in the task-relevant space and task-irrelevant space within the multi-dimensional space made up of individual segments’ centers of mass with a velocity adjustment. The dancers demonstrated greater utilization of redundant degrees of freedom (DoFs) supported by the greater task-irrelevant variability as compared to non-dancers. These findings suggest that long-term specialized dance training can improve the central nervous system’s ability to utilize the redundant DoFs in the whole-body system.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernard X. W. Liew ◽  
Alessandro Marco De Nunzio ◽  
Shraddha Srivastava ◽  
Deborah Falla

Abstract Having an abundance of motor solutions during movement may be advantageous for the health of musculoskeletal tissues, given greater load distribution between tissues. The aim of the present study was to understand whether motor abundance differs between people with and without low back pain (LBP) during a low-load lifting task. Motion capture with electromyography (EMG) assessment of 15 muscles was performed on 48 participants [healthy control (con) = 16, remission LBP (rLBP) = 16, current LBP (cLBP) = 16], during lifting. Non-negative matrix factorization and uncontrolled manifold analysis were performed to decompose inter-repetition variability in the temporal activity of muscle modes into goal equivalent (GEV) and non-goal equivalent (NGEV) variabilities in the control of the pelvis and trunk linear displacements. Motor abundance occurs when the ratio of GEV to NGEV exceeds zero. There were significant group differences in the temporal activity of muscle modes, such that both cLBP and rLBP individuals demonstrated greater activity of muscle modes that reflected lumbopelvic coactivation during the lifting phase compared to controls. For motor abundance, there were no significant differences between groups. Individuals with LBP, including those in remission, had similar overall motor abundance, but use different activation profiles of muscle modes than asymptomatic people during lifting.


Motor Control ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-382
Author(s):  
Mitchell Tillman ◽  
Satyajit Ambike

The authors examined how the stability of the current total isometric force (FT) produced by four fingers is influenced by previous and expected voluntary changes in FT. The authors employed the synergy index obtained from the across-trial uncontrolled manifold analysis to quantify the stability of FT. The authors compared two tasks with similar histories of FT changes; one in which participants expected changes in FT in the future, and one in which they expected no changes in FT. The stability of FT was lower in the former task, indicating the existence of a novel type of anticipatory synergy adjustment. Disparate histories of FT changes yield inconsistent changes in stability, driven by individual differences in the covariation in the finger forces that leave FT invariant. Future research should focus on exploring these individual differences to better understand how previous and expected behavior changes influence the stability of the current motor behavior.


2020 ◽  
Vol 123 (5) ◽  
pp. 1756-1765
Author(s):  
Yosuke Tomita ◽  
Nicolas A. Turpin ◽  
Daniele Piscitelli ◽  
Anatol G. Feldman ◽  
Mindy F. Levin

Reaching from standing requires simultaneous adjustments of end point and center-of-mass (COM) positions. We used uncontrolled manifold analysis to investigate the impact of stroke on the ability to use kinematic redundancy in this task. Our results showed that COM position was stabilized, whereas end-point trajectory was more variable in stroke than healthy subjects. Enhancing the capacity to meet multiple task goals may be beneficial for motor recovery after stroke.


2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (9) ◽  
pp. 1187-1196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felix Möhler ◽  
Sonja Marahrens ◽  
Steffen Ringhof ◽  
Ralf Mikut ◽  
Thorsten Stein

Motor Control ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-204 ◽  
Author(s):  
Inge Tuitert ◽  
Tim A. Valk ◽  
Egbert Otten ◽  
Laura Golenia ◽  
Raoul M. Bongers

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document