Repetition effects in action planning reflect effector- but not hemisphere-specific coding

Action choices are influenced by future and recent past action states. For example, when performing two actions in succession, response times (RT) to initiate the second action are reduced when the same hand is used. These findings suggest the existence of effector-specific processing for action planning. However, given that each hand is primarily controlled by the contralateral hemisphere, the RT benefit might actually reflect effector-independent, hemisphere-specific rather than effector-specific repetition effects. Here, participants performed two consecutive movements, each with a hand or a foot, in one of two directions. Direction was specified in an egocentric reference frame (inward, outward) or in an allocentric reference frame (left, right). Successive actions were initiated faster when the same limb (e.g., left hand - left hand), but not when the other limb of the same body side (e.g., left foot - left hand) executed the second action. The same-limb advantage was evident even when the two movements involved different directions, whether specified egocentrically or allocentrically. Corroborating evidence from computational modeling lends support to the claim that repetition effects in action planning reflect persistent changes in baseline activity within neural populations that encode effector-specific action plans.

Repetition effects in action selection reflect effector- but not hemisphere-specific coding

Action choices are influenced by future and recent past action states. For example, when performing two actions in succession, response times (RT) to initiate the second action are reduced when the same hand is used. These findings suggest the existence of effector-specific processing for action selection. However, given that each hand is primarily controlled by the contralateral hemisphere, the RT benefit might actually reflect body side or hemisphere-specific rather than effector-specific repetition effects. Here, participants performed two consecutive movements, each with a hand or a foot, in one of two directions. Direction was specified in an egocentric reference frame (inward, outward) or in an allocentric reference frame (left, right). Successive actions were initiated faster when the same limb (e.g., left hand - left hand), but not when the other limb of the same body side (e.g., left foot - left hand) executed the second action. The same-limb advantage was evident even when the two movements involved different directions, whether specified egocentrically or allocentrically. Corroborating evidence from computational modeling lends support to the claim that repetition effects in action selection reflect persistent changes in baseline activity within neural populations that encode effector-specific action plans.

State-dependent egocentric and allocentric heading representation in the monarch butterfly brain

Head direction can be represented in a self-centered egocentric or a viewpoint-invariant allocentric reference frame. Using the most efficient representation is especially crucial for migrating animals, like monarch butterflies (Danaus plexippus) that use the sun for orientation. With tetrode recordings from the brain of tethered flying monarch butterflies, we examined the reference frame in which insects encode heading. We show that compass neurons switch their reference frame in a state-dependent manner. In quiescence, they encode sun-bearing angles, allowing the butterfly to map the environment within an egocentric frame. However, during flight, the same neurons encode heading within an allocentric frame. This switch converts the sun from a local to a global cue, an ideal strategy for maintaining a migratory heading over large distance.One-Sentence SummaryHeading information is encoded in different state-dependent reference frames in the monarch butterfly central complex

EXPRESS: How do People Steer a Car to Intercept a Moving Target: Interceptions in Different Environments Point to One Strategy

Which strategy people use to guide locomotor interception remains unclear despite considerable research and the importance of an answer with ramification into the heuristics and biases debate. Because the constant bearing (CB) strategy corresponds to the target-heading (CTH) strategy with an additional constraint, these two strategies can be confounded experimentally. But, the two strategies are distinct in the information they require: while the CTH strategy only requires access to the relative angle between the direction of motion and the target, the CB strategy requires access to a stable allocentric reference frame. Here, we manipulated the visual information about allocentric reference frames in three virtual environments and asked participants to steer a car to intercept a moving target. Participants’ interception paths showed different degrees of curvature and their target-heading angles were approximately constant, consistent with the CTH strategy. By contrast, the target’s bearing angle continuously changed in all participants except one. This particular participant produced linear interception paths with little change in the target’s bearing angle, seemingly consistent with both strategies. This participant continued this pattern of steering even in the environment without any visual information about allocentric reference frames. Therefore, this pattern of steering is attributed to the CTH strategy rather than the CB strategy. The overall results add important evidence for the conclusion that locomotor interception is better accounted for by the CTH strategy and that experimentally observing a straight interception trajectory with a constant bearing angle is not sufficient evidence for the CB strategy.

The impact of the sensory augmentation device "feelSpace belt" on spatial orientation and navigation of blind people

Spatial orientation and navigation require cognitive skills, but most of all depend primarily on vision. Blind, visually impaired and deaf-blind people do not have this fast source of information about their environment available. To facilitate and enhance orientation and navigation and to make travelling outdoors safer for people deprived of visual input, the “feelSpace belt” can be used. The belt gives its wearer information about the magnetic north via vibrotactile stimulation around the waist. The aim of this study is to investigate to what extent the belt has an impact on the orientation and navigation abilities of blind people. Congenitally blind and late-blind subjects wore the belt for seven weeks in everyday situations and five of them additionally took part in behavioural experiments. Two deaf blind subjects wore the belt for three to four weeks. The experimental tasks took place before and in the middle of the participants’ training period. They consisted of a straight-line walking task to evaluate the belt’s effect on blind people trying to keep to the direction in which they are heading, an angular rotation task to examine the development of the egocentric orientation capabilities of the participants and a triangle completion navigation task to test whether the belt helps to take shortcuts. Weekly questionnaires gave an insight into the subjective experiences and evaluations of the participants. Overall, the belt’s information on cardinal directions proved to have intuitively a positive effect on the participants, facilitating especially orientation but also navigation. The results suggest that egocentric route based navigation, which has been shown in previous studies to be the favoured navigation strategy of blind people, was still preferred when the participants wore the belt but, due to the belt, was further extended by increased use of also the allocentric reference frame.

The Simon Effect Based on Allocentric and Egocentric Reference Frame: Common and Specific Neural Correlates

An object’s location can be represented either relative to an observer’s body effectors (egocentric reference frame) or relative to another external object (allocentric reference frame). In non-spatial tasks, an object’s task-irrelevant egocentric position conflicts with the side of a task-relevant manual response, which defines the classical Simon effect. Growing evidence suggests that the Simon effect occurs not only based on conflicting positions within the egocentric but also within the allocentric reference frame. Although neural mechanisms underlying the egocentric Simon effect have been extensively researched, neural mechanisms underlying the allocentric Simon effect and their potential interaction with those underlying its egocentric variant remain to be explored. In this fMRI study, spatial congruency between the task-irrelevant egocentric and allocentric target positions and the task-relevant response hand was orthogonally manipulated. Behaviorally, a significant Simon effect was observed for both reference frames. Neurally, three sub-regions in the frontoparietal network were involved in different aspects of the Simon effect, depending on the source of the task-irrelevant object locations. The right precentral gyrus, extending to the right SMA, was generally activated by Simon conflicts, irrespective of the spatial reference frame involved, and showed no additive activity to Simon conflicts. In contrast, the right postcentral gyrus was specifically involved in Simon conflicts induced by task-irrelevant allocentric, rather than egocentric, representations. Furthermore, a right lateral frontoparietal network showed increased neural activity whenever the egocentric and allocentric target locations were incongruent, indicating its functional role as a mismatch detector that monitors the discrepancy concerning allocentric and egocentric object locations.

A sense of space in postrhinal cortex

A topographic representation of local space is critical for navigation and spatial memory. In humans, topographic spatial learning relies upon the parahippocampal cortex, damage to which renders patients unable to navigate their surroundings or develop new spatial representations. Stable spatial signals have not yet been observed in its rat homolog, the postrhinal cortex. We recorded from single neurons in the rat postrhinal cortex whose firing reflects an animal’s egocentric relationship to the geometric center of the local environment, as well as the animal’s head direction in an allocentric reference frame. Combining these firing correlates revealed a population code for a stable topographic map of local space. This may form the basis for higher-order spatial maps such as those seen in the hippocampus and entorhinal cortex.

Role of the light source position in freely falling hoverflies' stabilization performances

The stabilization of plummeting hoverflies was filmed and analysed in terms of their wingbeat initiation times as well as the crash and stabilization rates. The flies experienced near-weightlessness for a period of time that depended on their ability to counteract the free fall by triggering their wingbeats. In this paradigm, hoverflies' flight stabilization strategies were investigated here for the first time under two different positions of the light source (overhead and bottom lighting). The crash rates were higher in bottom lighting conditions than with top lighting. In addition, adding a texture to the walls reduced the crash rates only in the overhead lighting condition. The position of the lighting also significantly affected both the stabilization rates and the time taken by the flies to stabilize, which decreased and increased under bottom lighting conditions, respectively, whereas textured walls increased the stabilization rates under both lighting conditions. These results support the idea that flies may mainly base their flight control strategy on visual cues and particularly that the light distribution in the visual field may provide reliable, efficient cues for estimating their orientation with respect to an allocentric reference frame. In addition, the finding that the hoverflies' optic flow-based motion detection ability is affected by the position of the light source in their visual field suggests the occurrence of interactions between movement perception and this visual vertical perception process.