Prediction of early left ventricular recovery and adverse remodelling in patients with acute myocardial infarction: the role of non-invasive myocardial work evaluation

Background Left ventricular recovery (LVR) and adverse left ventricular remodelling (aLVR) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) play an important prognostic role. Purpose Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of non-invasive myocardial work (MW), a new index of global and regional myocardial performance, to predict LVR and aLVR. Methods Fifty patients with AMI (mean age, 63,8±13,4 years), treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), were prospectively enrolled and underwent a transthoracic Doppler echocardiography within 48 hours after PCI and a median of 31 days at follow-up. Myocardial work is derived from the strain-pressure relation, integrating in its calculation the non-invasive arterial pressure. Segmental LVR was defined as an absolute improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥5% from LVEF at the baseline. The aLVR was defined as an increase of ≥20% of the LV end diastolic volume (LVEDV) at 1 month follow up. Results We found significant differences between the baseline and the follow-up value of LVEF (49,28 vs 52,80 p=0.001), Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) (−13,41 vs −18,72, p=0.016), Global Work Index (GWI) (1368,68 vs 1788,08, p<0.0001), Global Work Efficiency (GWE) (86,96 vs 91,36, p=0.001), and Global Constructive Work (GCW) (1619,16 vs 2008,68, p<0.0001). The LVR at 1 month of follow-up was observed in 36% of the population enrolled, whereas aLVR was described in 18% of cases. Using ROC curve analysis, we identified a cut off value of 137 mmHg/% for baseline Global Wasted Work (Sensitivity 100%, Specificity 57,14%, AUC 0.6667, CI 95%: 0,51618- 0,81715, p<0.0001) to identify patients with aLVR at 1 month. With regards to conventional echo parameters, patients with LVR showed lower baseline Wall Motion Score Index (WMSI) than those with LVR (1,73 vs 1,38, p=0.007). Conclusions Baseline global wasted work can predict early adverse left ventricular remodelling at 1 months after AMI. These parameters could be used at baseline in order to predict worse outcome in AMI patients. Further larger scale studies are needed to validate these findings. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

A Minimally Invasive Approach to Left Ventricular Assist Device Insertion Facilitates Subsequent Explant

A minimally invasive approach to left ventricular assist device (LVAD) insertion may benefit patients at the time of implant, but whether the approach to LVAD insertion influences the outcome of subsequent cardiovascular reoperations is unknown. Here we present the case of a 50-year-old male who underwent LVAD insertion through a minimally invasive approach and subsequently had left ventricular recovery. LVAD explant was performed without the use of any blood products or inotropic support. This case demonstrates that a minimally invasive approach to LVAD insertion may also facilitate subsequent device explant.