Does Cup-Grip Type Affect Tremor among People with Essential Tremor?

Essential tremor (ET) is a movement disorder that may cause functional disability in daily activities, such as drinking from a cup or drawing. This study aims to characterize effects of varied cup-grip types and measured axes on the actual performance of people with ET and find correlations between cup-grip type and measured axes, and spiral drawing measures. Participants (20 with ET and 18 controls) held a cup of water in a steady position in three grip types and drew a spiral. The cup acceleration was measured by the cup triaxial accelerometer, analyzed in X, Y and Z axes (directions); deviation of the measured acceleration from the desired steady position acceleration was computed. Significant group differences were found for outcome measures in all grip types. Among participants with ET, significantly higher measured values were found in the cup’s horizontal plane (X and Y axes) compared to the vertical direction (Z axis) and for on-the-handle versus around-the-cup grips in the X and Y axes. Significant correlations were found between this grip’s measures and spiral-drawing actual performance measures, indicating the measurement axis and grip type may affect actual performance. These findings may support the future development of assistive devices for tremor suppression and personalized supportive therapy.

Drawing Direction Effect on a Task’s Performance Characteristics among People with Essential Tremor

Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder affecting the performance of various daily tasks, including drawing. While spiral-drawing task characteristics have been described among patients with ET, research about the significance of the drawing direction of both spiral and lines tasks on the performance process is scarce. This study mapped inter-group differences between people with ET and controls related to drawing directions and the intra-effect of the drawing directions on the tremor level among people with ET. Twenty participants with ET and eighteen without ET drew spirals and vertical and horizontal lines on a digitizer with an inking pen. Time-based outcome measures were gathered to address the effect of the drawing directions on tremor by analyzing various spiral sections and comparing vertical and horizontal lines. Significant group differences were found in deviation of the spiral radius from a filtered radius curve and in deviation of the distance curve from a filtered curve for both line types. Significant differences were found between defined horizontal and vertical spiral sections within each group and between both line types within the ET group. A significant correlation was found between spiral and vertical line deviations from filtered curve outcome measures. Achieving objective measures about the significance of drawing directions on actual performance may support the clinical evaluation of people with ET toward developing future intervention methods for improving their functional abilities.

QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF ESSENTIAL TREMOR DURING CLINICAL SPIRAL DRAWING TASK USING GYRO SENSORS

The spiral drawing task is a representative clinical test used to assess essential tremor. Many clinicians have used spirography to assess through visual rating of the drawings. We quantitatively investigated the clinical characteristics of action tremors during spiral drawing tasks using 3-axis gyro sensors. Eighteen essential tremor patients with sensors attached to their forefinger, dorsum of the hand, and forearm participated in a spiral drawing test. As quantitative variables, the average speed, maximum frequency and maximum power were derived from the gyro sensor signals. The average speed and maximum power were also logarithmically transformed. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with tremor direction and joint (attachment location) as independent factors was performed to evaluate the main and interactive effects of direction and joint. Also, Spearman’s correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between the quantitative variables and visual rating scores. The average speed showed a significant main effect of direction ([Formula: see text]). Logarithmic variables showed interactive effects ([Formula: see text]) as well as main effects ([Formula: see text]). The interactive effects were attributed to no significant difference among the joints particularly in the roll direction ([Formula: see text]). The logarithmic variables of roll direction were significantly greater than that of the other directions ([Formula: see text]). Also, the quantitative variables were moderately correlated with visual rating scores ([Formula: see text], [Formula: see text]). These results indicate that kinetic tremor during spiral drawing mainly appears in the roll direction and may contribute to the determination of sensor location and direction for continuous monitoring of patients with essential tremor.